Who is the house of commons perv?

That depends, am I supposed to be working?

Assuming by ‘the house’ they mean house of commons, rather than ‘the private comfort of my own 2nd home” then yes you should be working, rather than cackling over some lady(or other, parhaps more specialist) pictures with a coleague.

Or indeed be asleep on the front bench like a homeless person a la JRM.

Maybe the seats should be refurbished with hand rails and metal spikes like they do with public benches, to prevent this sort of tardy attitude from ministers?

Or better still, replace all the commons benches with 45 degree downward angled seats like they do with bus stops.

Being logged into STW all day is also gross misconduct, whether you are using it or not. But we can look at STW at lunchtime. But definitely not porn.

What about playing Candy Crush during a meeting? Surprise surprise, that was also a Conservative…

That’s quite WTF isn’t it ?

Single sex public school educated, so a deeply misogynistic culture has been ingrained in them. I would suspect 56 is just the tip of the iceberg, most events go unreported as the victims get treated so badly it’s just not worth the extra suffering of reporting it.

Easiest headline to write ever…

[ metro.co.uk ]

Not overly surprised…a position of power immediately makes you think you are above everyone else

That’s exactly what my wife said when the story about Westwood came on the telly

I’d assumed it was like many previous cases where traces were found on computers etc.

Gads – they could at least use a tissue.

I think who isn’t the House of Commons perv might be a simpler question to answer.

More Tory trickle down. Did he splash out on a new suit I wonder?

I don’t think that is the assumption at all. I think the assumption is an MP was acting inappropriately by watching porn on work time, a gross misconduct offence, regardlesss of the porn delivery mechanism.

Precisely. It’d be gross misconduct at my work.

Did they have to get the super expensive and Ill fitting suit dry cleaned afterwards though? Is that a legitimate thing to put on your expenses form?

Asking for a Conservative friend.

Did he splash out on a new suit I wonder?

I think the problem here is he ‘splashed out’ on an existing suit, and now thinks the tax paying public should be covering the cost of that, or at least the dry cleaners bill. it’s an occupational hazzard right? 😉

How has a name not been released by now? Generally more than two people can’t keep a secret…

Timing. They’ll wait until they need to misdirect attention away from something serious before throwing him under a bus.

Neil Parish apparently

Underwhelming climax. https://t.co/QoHv4Y5mTS

— Mike Galsworthy (@mikegalsworthy) April 29, 2022

Must have been some kinky stuff as he’s had the whip removed…

Shame, not one of the “big names”.

According to Wikipedia “Parish is married to Susan, has two children and two grandchildren, and a Platinum+ Brazzers Membership”

🤣

According to Wikipedia

Its going through some quite rapid updates and now has a warning up.
Looked at it a few minutes back to try and see who he was and it had something along the lines of “watches the local football club when his masturbation habit allows”. Plus some suggestions as to exactly what sort of porn he was enjoying.

Timing. They’ll wait until they need to misdirect attention away from something serious before throwing him under a bus.

They’re about to repeal the Vagrancy Act. And replace it with something more insidious. I suppose if you can be arrested for begging then you’ll have a bed for the night at least. I came here just now to say “expect an announcement imminently”.

Neil Parish apparently

And there it is.

The wiki got removed really fast

And replace it with something more insidious. I suppose if you can be arrested for begging then you’ll have a bed for the night at least.

Yeah but where? Rwanda?