Home › Forums › Chat Forum › When was the "us and them" split made?
- This topic has 211 replies, 86 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by mikewsmith.
-
When was the "us and them" split made?
-
sbobFree Member
midlifecrashes – Member
Rightmove tells me there are 595 properties for sale under £90k near me, that’ll give you a £465/mo/25yr mortgage with a small deposit.
😆
£90k will get me a small plot of land with planning permission, or a two bed caravan in a trailer park.
harryjanFree MemberEver so glad I moved away from the South East London to Devon.
Victorian 3.5 bed terraced 10 minutes from the University/town for 175 in Plymouth. 20mins to the nearest beach or Dartmoor……
Job market is not great though admittedly
HoratioHufnagelFree MemberJob market is not great though admittedly
I think this is the key issue. Not enough investment outside the south east? Seems to be lots of affordable houses in other parts of the country.
P-JayFree Member£90k will get me a small plot of land with planning permission, or a two bed caravan in a trailer park.
Bit cheaper here – £90k gets you a 1 bed flat. Either ex-council in a dystopian estate or half a converted 2 up 2 down terrace house.
StoatsbrotherFree MemberThe price of housing in the Southeast reflects the strength of the Jobs market there, and that’s it really…
Yet we’d allbe better off if jobs shifted elsewhere and souh east house prices went down, except for a few people who live in the South East and have no kids and are going to downsize to use their property riches as a pension.
NorthwindFull Membernewrobdob – Member
I was wondering when did the split occur? <snip> First house was £53k, paid £28k of that off and sold for £110k. I might have been one of the last people to get a 100% mortgage
That’s when the split occurred.
binnersFull MemberIt won’t last forever though, all markets self-correct in the end
As has been stated repeatedly over the years though, it isn’t a functioning market. And hasn’t been for deacades. Governments constantly meddle in it for short term political expediency. From flogging cut price council homes in the 80’s (to buy votes) through to the frankly insane Help to Buy scheme introduced by Osbourne (to buy votes)
slackaliceFree MemberIMO, I think you’ll find the ‘us & them’ has just been re-established, except now the percentage of ownership has increased markedly from pre 80’s.
Which makes the lenders very happy as they now technically own much more capital/assets, earning interest ( read rent) on long term loans and taking very little liability and responsibility for the maintenance and upkeep, leaving that to the ‘owners’ ( read tenants – until,of course the debt is fully paid).
To summarise @stoats and @pjay 😉
whitestoneFree MemberJust looked at where we used to live in N. Wales. We lived in a terrace of slate miners’ cottages right next to a main road. Even for the area they were nothing special.
1999: £32k
2001: £41k
2002: £43k
2017: £90kApparently the average for a terraced house in that village is £122k.
Looking round us and up into The Dales – average price is £300k – £360k. These prices have a social impact. There’s no way a young couple can afford to buy a property given that most jobs in the area are agriculture/quarrying/tourism based. Is it any wonder that local schools are getting shut down due to lack of pupils. Yet attempts to provide “local” housing are met with resistance, primarily from those who can afford the current prices.
5labFree MemberI remember when I was younger, a typical mortgage was 3.5x a single salary (conventional wisdom was that you shouldn’t borrow more than this). So your £30k salary nets you a £105k mortgage. I hope you like living in the less salubrious end of Burnley.
and with interest rates at 11%, that’s possibly a sensible figure. When they’re <1%, what is the point in making a high earner move houses several times (in order to get to the house they want) rather than allowing them to borrow what is (to them) an affordable sum of money? static earning multiples are a pretty hopeless tool as they don’t take into consideration number of dependents, costs, or overall level of earning (bringing up a kid on £10k takes a lot more of your take-home income than bringing one up if you earn £100k). The graphs on the first page show that payments as a % of income are at their lowest rate since 1988..
everyoneFree Member208k will get you a rather nice (if I do say so myself) 3 bed detached corner plot with a garage in the grim midlands. It’s got riding from the door as well…
Granted I couldn’t have afforded it by myself or without help from parents so we’ve actually been very lucky. Saying that, friends that are more sensible with money have managed to save for a deposit (although I’m mainly friends with engineers so wages tend to be higher)
molgripsFree MemberIt won’t last forever though, all markets self-correct in the end
Yes and no. This isn’t a simple supply/demand system, because there are different aspects to demand.
We might end up with houses being affordable to private landlords but not first time buyers; which would result in houses being a commodity subject to its own market driven by investors not homeowners. So again, rich people get even richer as this capital gets handed down to offspring, and rents can go up to the point where the poorer or younger people can just about afford to pay leaving them no spare money to save. And worse still, if say young professionals can only afford to rent and not buy, they will become trapped so when they finally die they have no capital to pass on to their grandkids who won’t be able to get out of the trap.
Keeping people renting transfers money from the poor to the rich.
km79Free Member£90k will get me a small plot of land with planning permission, or a two bed caravan in a trailer park.
You’d get a 4 bed terraced house for that near me and enough change left over for a decent 2nd hand car. It wouldn’t be anything fancy but in a safe area with good neighbours.
I think too many people get caught up in what other people would think of them when buying somewhere to live and overstretch to the point they have almost nothing left over.
I’d much rather live very comfortably in a modest house in a less desirable area than be upto my eyeballs in debt with not much spare for anything else.
I suppose the same goes for cars.
sbobFree MemberI’ve just resigned myself to living in footflaps’ shed until I manage to kill off the family.
P-JayFree Memberbinners – Member
It won’t last forever though, all markets self-correct in the end
As has been stated repeatedly over the years though, it isn’t a functioning market. And hasn’t been for deacades. Governments constantly meddle in it for short term political expediency. From flogging cut price council homes in the 80’s (to buy votes) through to the frankly insane Help to Buy scheme introduced by Osbourne (to buy votes)
I have it on good authority that 1) the Banks are ready to absorb a reduction or hold in property prices on their balance sheets, 2) the number of Millennials and X&Ys in ‘generation rent’ along with concerned mortgage payers is passing the number of Boomers to make it politically viable to do it.
The recent easing of planning rules and large scale building projects represents the first cracks in post-credit crunch plan to protect prices.
It won’t hopfully be a massive crash, it’s unlikey (Brexit disaster aside) but the gap between income and prices will narrow and it will be by a lot.
HoratioHufnagelFree MemberI’d much rather live very comfortably in a modest house in a less desirable area than be upto my eyeballs in debt with not much spare for anything else.
What else do you do with your money though?
It’s not just a case of trying to impress people, in the early 2000’s it was one of the best investments you could have made. And the best thing is, it’s mostly the banks money your investing, like a 10x mutiplier of your deposit.
footflapsFull MemberI remember when I was younger, a typical mortgage was 3.5x a single salary (conventional wisdom was that you shouldn’t borrow more than this)
That ratio was the max I could borrow in 97 IIRC.
I’ve just resigned myself to living in footflaps’ shed until I manage to kill off the family.
I have 16 Lithuanians in there at the moment…….
epicsteveFree MemberMy daughter is 25 and about 2 years into a career as an IT consultant. Late last year she changed job so that instead of being based in London she could base herself out of Edinburgh, with one of the main reasons being was that she can afford to buy a decent flat now (£110-130K or so) in Edinburgh but is years away from being able to do so in London (and even if she could it’d either be a shite area or really far out).
molgripsFree MemberI think too many people get caught up in what other people would think of them when buying somewhere to live
If you live in an area with cheap housing, I suspect you haven’t experienced what drives people to stretch themselves with house prices.
buenfoxaFree MemberI don’t get the issue from my experience; I bought my first house with then girlfriend at 23 years old in 2010 for £135k. Salaries where £20k each. We then sold that for same price and bought second home for £186k on a joint salary 50k. We sold that 3 years later for £60k profit and bought our house now for £205k and spent £20k renovating – it’s now worth £300k with a mortgage of £200k on a joint salary of £70k. We haven’t been ‘lucky’ on house purchases – simply bought the right house in the right area and renovated it sensibly.
In my area – N.Wales and Chester house prices are certainly reachable and there’s still money to be made.
DickyboyFull MemberNothing on rightmove for under £90k here, oh apart from a block of 3 garages for £65k and an old BT repeater station for £20k and Aylesbury is hardly leafy suburbia
SandwichFull MemberI have 16 Lithuanians in there at the moment…….
Must try harder, I reckon you could house 30 Syrians at a push.
binnersFull MemberI have it on good authority that 1) the Banks are ready to absorb a reduction or hold in property prices on their balance sheets, 2) the number of Millennials and X&Ys in ‘generation rent’ along with concerned mortgage payers is passing the number of Boomers to make it politically viable to do it.
I’ll believe it when I see it. Every single government has made similar noises. None have got even close to actually doing anything realistic about it. As with most things where politicians and bankers are concerned, don’t listen to what they say, look at what they do.
finbarFree MemberIt won’t hopfully be a massive crash, it’s unlikey (Brexit disaster aside) but the gap between income and prices will narrow and it will be by a lot.
Given there’s no indication wages will rise meaningfully in the short-medium term, I don’t think we can have one without the other.
I think the only thing that is likely to make houses affordable for first time buyers again is a rise in interest rates big enough to shaft people who are leveraged really hard on their existing mortgages, a la the 80s. However I don’t think BoE will be willing/allowed by its political overlords to raise rates, even to counter the horrendous inflation we’ll see as a result of Brexit.
EDIT: beaten to it by Binners, more or less.
whitestoneFree MemberSometimes it is luck, “well timed” might be a better term: when I moved to our current area I was renting a flat at £300pcm as well as paying a small mortgage on our then current house. It wasn’t a nice area so looked for something else, found a small terraced house for £34k, I’d got savings so put down a decent deposit and had a second mortgage of £115pcm.
We then moved to the area and bought our current house, sold the terraced house for £60k after just two years of owning it and basically paid off the mortgage on our current house. The sub-prime financial crisis started about six months later.
Edit: and when I went to the bank to use the proceeds to pay off the mortgage I got: “Ooh! You’ve a lot of spare equity. Do you want to take out a loan?”
vinnyehFull MemberIt’s not just a case of trying to impress people, in the early 2000’s it was one of the best investments you could have made. And the best thing is, it’s mostly the banks money your investing, like a 10x mutiplier of your deposit.
This, in the SE.
Housing in London is/was the 90’s/00’s replacement for the final salary pension. We’ve been very, very fortunate- especially since we left and bought elsewhere..
oldmanmtbFree MemberHad this thread before and as I pointed out Darlington in Durham is a great town with plenty of Jobs and good affordable housing on the East Coast Main line – however the person that was moaning didn’t want to live in a “Darlington” they wanted trendy Leeds city centre for £2.50… there is loads of affordable houses in the UK just not in the South East
bearnecessitiesFull MemberIrrespective of all of this^, it’s a total shitter on one salary 🙂
TheSouthernYetiFree Memberthere is loads of affordable houses in the UK just not in the South East
Aye, it’s grim daan saff!
molgripsFree MemberI bought my first house with then girlfriend at 23 years old in 2010 for £135k. Salaries where £20k each
What if you don’t both earn 20k? What if you’re single?
You really can’t see a problem?
DickyboyFull MemberTo answer the OP, 1999 dot com bubble, investors got out and put money in housing, cheap credit and low interest is making many things boom in price as keeping money in the bank earning 1% is pretty pointless, witness silly prices for classic cars, bikes, art etc etc
CougarFull MemberWhat if you don’t both earn 20k? What if you’re single?
What if you’re married with a partner who can’t work, 2.4 kids and a spaniel?
That’s the point I was alluding to (badly). Time was, one salary could raise a family. Now we’ve got a situation where both adults have to work in order to keep a roof over their heads whilst maintaining a half decent standard of living.
I don’t have kids, I don’t know how you lot do it.
johndohFree MemberI don’t know how you lot do it.
I sometimes wonder how (and have posted around this subject in the past). I earn decent money, my wife gets a small salary from my business and also works part time so between us our income (before tax) is around £80k.
We have a mortgage (£1k a month but ‘own’ around 65% of our current house) but no other debts (ie, no HP on cars etc) other than the usual household things yet every single month we are broke. Yes we get some nice things but are very careful with money (my wife shops at Primark/Sainsbury’s etc for clothes, I use TK Maxx) and we do get to go away on holiday once a year. but that is never anything overly fancy.
However, many of the other parents at our girls’ school rock up in expensive cars/4x4s, go to exotic locations for 5 star holidays (two, three and even four times a year) and all seem to be draped in expensive clothes and jewellery – and they all have nice houses and are spending loads on extensions/conversions etc. One parent recently posted on Facebook (about a week after returning from a 5 Star holiday in Mauritius) asking about recommendations for luxury breaks to Lapland for next Christmas.
I simply do not know how people* do it – are they all just banging it all on credit?
*However I do know that one family have an interest only mortgage which (to my mind) is utterly bonkers.
sbobFree MemberSandwich – Member
Must try harder, I reckon you could house 30 Syrians at a push.
Under 16s or children? 🙂
trail_ratFree MemberIm 30.
3 bed semi in the greenbelt.
Set our goal and saved like **** for it
I did 18months adhoc taking all the work abroad I could get in equatorial guinea- Nigeria and holland working on the rig’s.7-8 weeks at a time. I did another 3 years doing ad-hoc without the same urgency mind to get the money to renovate it and to pay it down to a comfortable monthly level. And have finally taken a position where I only work 6 months of the year to shift the balance back the other way.
I have several peers who are all similarly educated living near by who have all bought houses in a variety of methods. Some have grafted for a deposit like we did – others the bank of mum and dad and some are mortgaged to the eyeballs.
How ever being in a very expensive part of Scotland( compared to living in Dundee or Glasgow) I must say I don’t know too many people who have not managed to get them selves a house IF they wanted one.
Equally Brother in law bought a nice 2 bed flat for less than half what our house cost – in Glasgow.
I’m not sure what I did is too different to the olden days. One of my older colleagues dad’s bought his house after 2 years in south Georgia whaling !
DickyboyFull MemberJohndoe – interest only mortgage makes sense if it is far cheaper than renting and you are investing the extra elsewhere for greater return
Edit 80k PA and you are broke!
qwertyFree Memberlondon and south east, properties are expensive, but not definitely ‘too’ expensive
johndohFree Memberinterest only mortgage makes sense if it is far cheaper than renting and you are investing the extra elsewhere for greater return
Well yes, *IF* you are. I have no idea if they are or not, but the amount they spend on cars (they currently have four although only two people can drive), holidays, clothes etc makes it seem unlikely (neither are exactly high earners although of course I don’t know particular details and perhaps they have been recipients of windfalls).
johndohFree MemberEdit 80k PA and you are broke!
Yup! I really don’t know how, but we do spend quite a lot on clubs etc for our children which really adds up – singing clubs, gymnastics, horse riding, music lessons etc – I guess we are investing in their wellbeing.
aPFree Memberlondon and south east, properties are expensive, but not definitely ‘too’ expensive
Two of my younger colleagues have just bought a 1 bed flat together for £450k.
The topic ‘When was the "us and them" split made?’ is closed to new replies.