What hardtail frame...
 

Subscribe now and choose from over 30 free gifts worth up to £49 - Plus get £25 to spend in our shop

[Closed] What hardtail frame - 650b long, low slack

121 Posts
53 Users
0 Reactions
349 Views
Posts: 1413
Free Member
Topic starter
 

So if my warranty frame comes through from Commencal what are the options for a replacement?

Getting downhill quickly is more important to me than climbing back up, saying that I don't want something so heavy that I'll suffer on our weekly xc rides.

Ideal spec as follows:
- 650b
- Designed around a 140/150mm fork
- Long and low frame,
- Head angle around 65 deg
- Tapered HT
- 142 x 12 rear end (not a deal breaker)
- Stealth dropper (not a deal breaker)
- Lastly but most important of all, good after sales/customer services

What are peoples thoughts on the following and are there any frames missing that I should be looking into? Slightly worryingly most of these have the extended seat tube design that has caused me a bit of grief previously!

Transition TransAM
Stanton Switchback
Bird Zero - know very little about them
Ragley Bluepig - looks quite short on paper, possibly heavy?
Orange Crush - expensive?
PP Shan - expensive?
Genesis Altitude - steep ha, heavy?


 
Posted : 16/12/2015 3:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Pace rc127?


 
Posted : 16/12/2015 3:31 pm
Posts: 1083
Full Member
 

Apart from long and low (it might be, but I don't know) and 65 degree head angle (think mine is closer to 67, although the new models are out and might be slacker?) the Bird ticks all those boxes. They are very good to deal with, both before and after you buy. Although I didn't get any instructions with mine, it must be said 🙂


 
Posted : 16/12/2015 3:35 pm
Posts: 23296
Free Member
 

shan?


 
Posted : 16/12/2015 3:40 pm
Posts: 41684
Free Member
 

Last Fastforward (and some 2.8" tyres)


 
Posted : 16/12/2015 3:49 pm
Posts: 14022
Full Member
 

- 650b
- Designed around a 140/150mm fork
- Long and low frame,
- Head angle around 65 deg
- Tapered HT
- 142 x 12 rear end (not a deal breaker)
- Stealth dropper (not a deal breaker)
- Lastly but most important of all, good after sales/customer services

Bird Zero AM. Ticks ALL the boxes and although mine hasn't arrived yet (the frames are due in tomorrow) the customer service so far has been excellent.


 
Posted : 16/12/2015 3:59 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

In the long tradition of recommending what you own, I have a 650B TransAM with 140 forks and I'd say that it fits your requirements very well. Tremendous fun on the downs and no slouch on the climbs. To be fair I haven't really done any long xc type rides yet but I don't foresee any problems!!


 
Posted : 16/12/2015 4:13 pm
Posts: 1827
Free Member
 

Mondraker Vantage?


 
Posted : 16/12/2015 4:42 pm
Posts: 634
Full Member
 

At the current price I'm giving the 45650b a bash. May use angle headset to slacken more. Will try without first.


 
Posted : 16/12/2015 4:55 pm
Posts: 8177
Free Member
 

Crush is ace, really enjoying mine. I got mine as an insurance replacement for a 26" wheel on-one 456 and the crush is better IMO. Don't know if it's the switch to 27.5" wheels (boom! There goes the internet) or if it's the geo, but it just feels planted and surprisingly comfy.

I've had to contact Orange about a couple of things and they've been helpful. Not sure it's expensive TBH (any more so than equivalent frames anyway).


 
Posted : 16/12/2015 4:59 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

Just ordered a Bird Zero TR frameset, very helpful via email. My riding buddy, he's got an Aeris, really rates their customer services and he's a fussy bugger!


 
Posted : 16/12/2015 5:01 pm
Posts: 1401
Full Member
 

i have a trans am 27.5 at 130. long and slack enough, nice short chainstays. its really fun downhill and pretty good uphill, certainly climbs as well as the soul it replaced. strava rates it verses the soul too, in both directions. Not the lightest frame but thats not felt an issue so far

Mine gets used for xc with a focus on fun coming back down but i like to climb too. My full sus is a bandit 275 and this has similar geometry and feel just without the full bounce.

dont the whyte hardtails have that sort of geometry too? they are highly rated.


 
Posted : 16/12/2015 5:40 pm
Posts: 3223
Free Member
 

Shan isnt long - well the 26" isnt. I havent tried my mates 27.5 yet. Its also designed around 150/160 fork. Maybe the Oka?
Switchback is long, low and 140-150. Sounds spot on


 
Posted : 16/12/2015 5:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Kingdom Vendetta 2 should fit the bill, or get in touch with Chris there, and he custom make something similar, to tick all your boxes.

Loving mine
[img][URL= http://i1273.photobucket.com/albums/y413/paulwatterson/image_zpspwqhcqrs.jpe g" target="_blank">http://i1273.photobucket.com/albums/y413/paulwatterson/image_zpspwqhcqrs.jpe g"/> [/IMG][/URL][/img]


 
Posted : 16/12/2015 5:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The new orange p7 slacker than the crush and steel frame so not as harsh...I think orange will do well selling these if they keep the prices down that is ..


 
Posted : 16/12/2015 6:21 pm
Posts: 34462
Full Member
 

Shan and Meta designed by same people, (Ex Commencal designers) Jus' so you know.


 
Posted : 16/12/2015 6:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Transam isn't as slack as you might have in mind, other than that you've pretty much described it. Give us a shout if you'd like to try one out in mid-Wales.


 
Posted : 16/12/2015 7:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Shan is everything bar long and stealth dropper. However it is very flickable and pp have a ex display one in green for 400 euro.


 
Posted : 16/12/2015 7:09 pm
Posts: 714
Full Member
 

Not sure how the 650b BFe measures up in terms of angles, but that might be worth a look?


 
Posted : 16/12/2015 7:27 pm
Posts: 2102
Free Member
 

I'd suggest a whyte but don't think they're available frame only


 
Posted : 16/12/2015 7:28 pm
Posts: 1401
Full Member
 

The new p7 is a nice looking bike isn't it?

Depends on what / where you're riding I guess but the trans am is 67 at 130, I guess it would be 66.5 with a 140 fork? That's plenty slack enough to ride downhill quickly with no rear suspension?!

I think the bfe is a little steeper?

The new dmr trail star is another one to throw in the mix?


 
Posted : 16/12/2015 7:45 pm
 poah
Posts: 6494
Free Member
 

the bird AM would be my choice


 
Posted : 16/12/2015 7:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Bird Zero TR if you want to go low. Zero AM for something a little more aggressive.


 
Posted : 16/12/2015 8:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

In typical stw fashion, recommend what you ride - I love my pp shan 27.


 
Posted : 16/12/2015 8:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Got to be a Switchback. Bloody love mine, so much so that I've sold the steel one and m full sus to buy the Ti version.

Only things it's not got is the stalth dropper routing.

My old steel one

[img] [/img]

And my current Ti one

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 16/12/2015 9:35 pm
Posts: 1197
Full Member
 

Just to throw in another couple of names, I'd be looking at a BTR Ranger or a Curtis AM7.

I'm looking around my house deciding what I can sell just thinking about them 😀


 
Posted : 16/12/2015 9:47 pm
Posts: 1083
Full Member
 

Slightly worryingly most of these have the extended seat tube design that has caused me a bit of grief previously!

Doesn't follow that you'll have the same problems though. Quick email to whichever one you choose for an answer, then you're good to go.


 
Posted : 16/12/2015 9:49 pm
Posts: 14022
Full Member
 

Slightly worryingly most of these have the extended seat tube design that has caused me a bit of grief previously!

You don't often hear people talking about breaking frames like these - unlike Commencals (what a PR disaster your thread is!!!) I saw on the Bird site that none of their original Zero frames have broken and the new AM version uses the same tubes with longer/slacker/lower geometry.


 
Posted : 16/12/2015 11:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The Stanton Switchback is the slackest HA hardtail but might not have the longest TT.
I had a great time riding BPW on mine with the Army DH & Enduro team


 
Posted : 17/12/2015 7:43 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have an original Zero and it's a fantastic bike. The new TR and AM are looking even better (may swap to one myself) and as others have said, they've been great to deal with.


 
Posted : 17/12/2015 9:49 am
Posts: 1413
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Thanks for all the info, looks like my original thoughts were along the right lines.

Need to try to get a ride on a Switchback, Bird and TransAm I think.

Lovely as that Kingdom is budget needs to be close to what my frame will sell for, similarly I'd love another Curtis (had a sx26 back int day) but can't justify the price tag.

Doesn't follow that you'll have the same problems though. Quick email to whichever one you choose for an answer, then you're good to go.

Exactly, I'm not really that worried if they say it's all good.


 
Posted : 17/12/2015 9:53 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

NS Eccentric - surprised it hasn't come up once yet, looks fab in black too.


 
Posted : 17/12/2015 9:59 am
Posts: 40428
Free Member
 

You're an XL aren't you?

Might the Switchback be too short for you? The bigger model looks too short for my liking with a 410.5mm reach - and I'm 5ft 8in.

Mondraker Vantage is in another postcode to the competition, length-wise. Reach of 517mm!

The new Bird Zero AM might be a reasonable option, with 478mm reach in XL. Surprised to see that's the same price as the Orange Crush though.


 
Posted : 17/12/2015 10:12 am
Posts: 14022
Full Member
 

Bear in mind that with any of these hardtails there is a fair bit of geometric tweakery available - if they have 44mm headtubes they can take a -1 deg angleset with a tapered fork, if they have tapered headtubes they can take up to a -2 degree angleset with a tapered fork. And obviously you can run a variety of forks lengths, up to whatever the maximum is.

So the Bird AM I've ordered is coming with a -2 deg angleset (I already had one which they're kindly fitting but they can supply up to -1.5 deg as standard) and with the Pike lowered from 150 to 130mm. That's gives the medium frame the following static geometry (the changes make it slacker, lower and longer than the stock version):

HA: 64.3
SA: 75.4
ETT: 611
Reach: 450
BB drop: 55
Wheelbase: 1178

The reach and ETT on the XL frame are both just over 40mm longer, though the XL frames aren't arriving in the pre-Xmas shipment.


 
Posted : 17/12/2015 10:29 am
Posts: 1413
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Closer to L on most size charts (6ft) but would happily ride an XL if it doesn't look like a gate and numbers are right.

I think you might be right on the Swichback, lovely looking thing but I think reach is going to be more important than the HA.

I did look at the Mondraker but not sure I can get passed the looks of the thing!


 
Posted : 17/12/2015 10:33 am
Posts: 1413
Free Member
Topic starter
 

So the Bird AM I've ordered is coming with a -2 deg angleset (I already had one which they're kindly fitting but they can supply up to -1.5 deg as standard) and with the Pike lowered from 150 to 130mm. That's gives the medium frame the following static geometry (the changes make it slacker, lower and longer than the stock version):

That sounds like it's going to be a blast! Out of interest... where in the UK are you? 😉


 
Posted : 17/12/2015 10:36 am
Posts: 8177
Free Member
 

Doesn't adding a slackset lengthen the wheelbase but shorten the ett/reach though chief? Or have I got that all wrong!? 🙂


 
Posted : 17/12/2015 10:41 am
Posts: 13806
Free Member
 

woody2000 - Member
Doesn't adding a slackset lengthen the wheelbase but shorten the ett/reach though chief? Or have I got that all wrong!?

Yes - but you have eight or ten times as much length in the fork as you do above the headset, so it makes a much bigger difference to wheelbase than reach.


 
Posted : 17/12/2015 10:56 am
Posts: 14022
Full Member
 

That sounds like it's going to be a blast! Out of interest... where in the UK are you?

I'm in Brighton (yes we do have some steep hills here, they just don't don't go on for all that long...) V excited!

Offset bushings (on a full-sus only obviously!) slacken both HA and SA and shorten the reach (not sure about ETT), like running a bike with more rear sag than front sag. But slacksets drop the headtube by kicking the front wheel out so the fork swaps vertical height for horizontal reach, and dropping the head tube rotates the frame forwards, increasing the reach and steepening the seat tube (which is why the ETT shortens slightly).

I spent countless hours over the last couple of months designing my own frame (but that seems to be in limbo as the guy dealing with Taiwan to arrange getting the sample built is very busy) and when I saw the new Zero AM's geometry I realised that with the addition of a slackset and shorter fork it would be really close to what I'd designed - it's ridiculously close in fact, angles within 1/4 degree, same reach, same head tube length, seat tube 10mm longer - biggest differences are BB 5mm lower and chainstays 10mm shorter. Would be rude not to buy one! 😉


 
Posted : 17/12/2015 11:06 am
Posts: 569
Free Member
 

I have a Bird Aeris, so can't comment on HTs but can on customer service, which has been impeccable. Sounds like you need a Zero AM, though it's the TR that gets my juices going *bows out with little grace*.


 
Posted : 17/12/2015 11:13 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Closer to L on most size charts (6ft) but would happily ride an XL if it doesn't look like a gate and numbers are right.

I think you might be right on the Swichback, lovely looking thing but I think reach is going to be more important than the HA.

I did look at the Mondraker but not sure I can get passed the looks of the thing!

I'm the same height as you neat enough and find the Switchback fine. I run a 50mm stem and a 785mm bar. Whilst not the longest thing in the world it's fine for long rides and that's coming from a Banshee Rune as my main bike which was pretty long.

Customer service is good too - Dan is a top bloke.

Where are you based?


 
Posted : 17/12/2015 2:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Had a 45650b with a 150mm fork....i sold it as it was boring.

Now let me explain that comment as it sounds like I'm bashing the bike, I'm not, it was very capable....too capable.
I like HTs to be flickable, I like them to pop off roots, manual over obstacles and make me think about line choice...the 45650b was so good it took a lot of that away...i may as well have been riding a FS....which is a massive compliment I suppose!

It rode great, climbed well, descended like a DH bike and was all day comfortable....price is unbeatable too, in raw they're stunning...i had it all 3 months before breaking it down and selling it off to buy a 26er Ragley....which behaves how I like HTs to ride.

I'd get one if outright speed is your goal, it really is a steamroller of a bike and makes a tricky trail ridiculously easy to ride...if however you want fun, but more involvement from your HT then chose something else.
Enjoy either way!


 
Posted : 17/12/2015 4:14 pm
Posts: 10953
Free Member
 

The geometry of the Whyte 905 is pretty out there, very long & low, with a 66.5' head angle. The small has an ETT of 619mm & reach of 431mm! XL has a 674mm ETT & 475mm of reach!!!!!!! BB sits @ 305mm with a 130mm fork.


 
Posted : 17/12/2015 4:23 pm
Posts: 1413
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I had a 456c for a while, whist it was a quick bike it was filling-rattlingly stiff and probably the ugliest bike I've ever owned, I know the steel should be a lot more compliant but fancy something different.

The Whyte does look good and they're local too, can you get them as a frame only though?

Having spent a bit of time looking at the options I think that (on paper at least) the only thing that comes close to both geometry and budget is the Bird Zero AM.


 
Posted : 21/12/2015 9:39 am
Posts: 4626
Full Member
 

Im just gonna leave this here 🙂

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 21/12/2015 10:42 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Love my switchback BUT its not without issues - limited rear tyre clearance (2.3 HR is fine but no go for Magic Marys) and rear disc mount is about 5mm to high (180 mount/rotor on a 142x12 rear dropouts)


 
Posted : 21/12/2015 10:48 am
Posts: 1413
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Im just gonna leave this here

Swine!

142 - check
ISCG - check
stealth ready - check
rad colour - check


 
Posted : 21/12/2015 11:14 am
Posts: 14022
Full Member
 

Rad! When are the full builds shipping out?


 
Posted : 21/12/2015 11:47 am
Posts: 4626
Full Member
 

@chiefgrooveguru today - big load going out today, more tomorrow. Should clear the whole backlog by Wednesday.


 
Posted : 21/12/2015 11:56 am
Posts: 4626
Full Member
 

Heres a yet-to-be-finished-photoshopping yellow for you..

[url= https://farm1.staticflickr.com/646/23258944624_a9fa7be191_b.jp g" target="_blank">https://farm1.staticflickr.com/646/23258944624_a9fa7be191_b.jp g"/> [/img][/url][url= https://flic.kr/p/BrjaUC ]yellow Front on 3-4[/url] by [url= https://www.flickr.com/photos/59606294@N08/ ]Bird[/url], on Flickr


 
Posted : 21/12/2015 12:55 pm
Posts: 4626
Full Member
 

@chiefgrooveguru your's is in a work stand now... I think ... 130mm Pikes, -1.5 Angleset? Will ship tomorrow therefore.


 
Posted : 21/12/2015 1:00 pm
Posts: 5745
Full Member
 

http://enduro-mtb.com/en/eurobike-2015-liteville-reveal-two-new-bikes/

coming soon 🙂

No idea on angles/reach etc but I reckon it looks the dogs danglies (but then I am biased)


 
Posted : 21/12/2015 1:10 pm
Posts: 14022
Full Member
 

@chiefgrooveguru your's is in a work stand now... I think ... 130mm Pikes, -1.5 Angleset? Will ship tomorrow therefore.

Yes, 130mm Pikes but -2 deg Works headset (which I sent you). Exciting! Better get some brake adaptors ordered so I can swap my Hopes on... Wednesday arrival likely then?


 
Posted : 21/12/2015 1:11 pm
Posts: 4626
Full Member
 

What adaptors do you need? I will chuck you in some.


 
Posted : 21/12/2015 1:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Love my switchback BUT its not without issues - limited rear tyre clearance (2.3 HR is fine but no go for Magic Marys) and rear disc mount is about 5mm to high (180 mount/rotor on a 142x12 rear dropouts)

The tyre thing is a bit of a pain (I run 2.2 Trail Kings and there's not tonnes of clearance - certainly not like on my Rune). Not noticed ant issues with the rear brake alignment on either of mine.

But I love the way it rides, so can forgive it.

That Bird does look nice though.


 
Posted : 21/12/2015 1:19 pm
Posts: 14022
Full Member
 

What adaptors do you need? I will chuck you in some.

That's very kind, thanks! Hope 183mm front and rear.


 
Posted : 21/12/2015 1:24 pm
Posts: 4626
Full Member
 

Ahh, sorry dude! Those for 183mm floaters? We don't carry those I am afraid. 🙁


 
Posted : 21/12/2015 1:37 pm
Posts: 14022
Full Member
 

Yes, they're a silly size! Apparently Hope are switching to 180mm for next year's models...


 
Posted : 21/12/2015 1:39 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

@benpinnick Is that the Zero TR?


 
Posted : 21/12/2015 1:43 pm
Posts: 14022
Full Member
 

@benpinnick How much steerer tube do you leave above the stem on your builds?


 
Posted : 21/12/2015 1:45 pm
Posts: 4626
Full Member
 

30mm including the HS stack,so on yours it will be 20 or 25 because the headset has a big top stack.


 
Posted : 21/12/2015 2:25 pm
Posts: 4626
Full Member
 

@leftyboy - they are both AMs.


 
Posted : 21/12/2015 2:27 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

@benpinnick Nice I'm expecting delivery of my Zero TR frameset tomorrow 🙂


 
Posted : 21/12/2015 3:56 pm
Posts: 1413
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Done the bright yellow frame now but that matt black looks stunning! Would go well with black on black Revs and plain carbon wheels that are in the shed...

Out of interest how much seat post do you recommend to run in the frame?


 
Posted : 21/12/2015 4:34 pm
Posts: 4626
Full Member
 

@jamesfts on an AM L you need 120mm ideally. You could get away with 110mm if you really had too - if your not too heavy!

@chiefgrooveguru your bike is done. Man thats a long, low and raked out machine. Looks rad in super blacked out build.


 
Posted : 21/12/2015 5:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Looks like you have already decided, but will mention anyway that I have a Ragley Blue Pig and although it's quite heavy it climbs reasonably well. I rode it in the Alps this year and it feels nice and robust!


 
Posted : 21/12/2015 5:10 pm
Posts: 1413
Free Member
Topic starter
 

@chiefgrooveguru any chance of photos when it turns up please!?


 
Posted : 21/12/2015 5:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

@benpinnick what sort of cost for that yellow one in the pic? Been looking at building up a trail hardtail but buying a Bird complete May be cheaper


 
Posted : 21/12/2015 6:21 pm
Posts: 4626
Full Member
 

That one is just over £2000 I think - but its pretty high spec throughout - pretty much top end with Atlas/Turbine everywhere, Pike RCT3s etc. You could trim it down to < £1900 and still have pikes/reverb/XT11 etc. and I don't think you'd notice a major practical difference in terms of ride. Of course I would prefer you stay at the top end 😉


 
Posted : 21/12/2015 11:50 pm
Posts: 4626
Full Member
 

If @chiefgrooveguru doesn't mind and its not boxed by the time I get in tomorrow I would be happy to post up some pics.


 
Posted : 22/12/2015 12:44 am
Posts: 14022
Full Member
 

I'd be very happy for you to post some pics!


 
Posted : 22/12/2015 8:54 am
Posts: 4626
Full Member
 

No time for the studio I am afraid... but heres some quick shots:

[url= https://farm1.staticflickr.com/762/23822289541_86f01e1f2b_b.jp g" target="_blank">https://farm1.staticflickr.com/762/23822289541_86f01e1f2b_b.jp g"/> [/img][/url][url= https://flic.kr/p/Ci6sJ2 ]CGG 1[/url] by [url= https://www.flickr.com/photos/59606294@N08/ ]shouldknowbettor[/url], on Flickr

[url= https://farm1.staticflickr.com/601/23536896899_7a239bfd1b_b.jp g" target="_blank">https://farm1.staticflickr.com/601/23536896899_7a239bfd1b_b.jp g"/> [/img][/url][url= https://flic.kr/p/BRSKre ]CGG 2[/url] by [url= https://www.flickr.com/photos/59606294@N08/ ]shouldknowbettor[/url], on Flickr

[url= https://farm1.staticflickr.com/620/23822278301_fa57f3e42c_b.jp g" target="_blank">https://farm1.staticflickr.com/620/23822278301_fa57f3e42c_b.jp g"/> [/img][/url][url= https://flic.kr/p/Ci6poe ]cgg 3[/url] by [url= https://www.flickr.com/photos/59606294@N08/ ]shouldknowbettor[/url], on Flickr


 
Posted : 22/12/2015 10:44 am
Posts: 50
Free Member
 

Thats pure sex!


 
Posted : 22/12/2015 11:15 am
Posts: 1413
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Yeah, that does look bloody good.

What size is that Ben?


 
Posted : 22/12/2015 11:19 am
Posts: 4626
Full Member
 

Errr... medium I think. Bear in mind though the L is only 1" taller so it looks pretty similar.


 
Posted : 22/12/2015 11:27 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

That does indeed look pretty damn nice.


 
Posted : 22/12/2015 11:30 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ben can I email you about some specs? What's ur email?


 
Posted : 22/12/2015 1:50 pm
Posts: 4626
Full Member
 

No probs - ben@birdmtb.co.uk. We stock most things (decent) from Shimano, SRAM, Rockshox, RaceFace, DT Swiss (E series) and Maxxis, so you can basically just write out a wish list if you want 🙂


 
Posted : 22/12/2015 1:55 pm
Posts: 1083
Full Member
 

Brickwork lower down needs some attention.


 
Posted : 22/12/2015 2:36 pm
Posts: 14022
Full Member
 

Awesome! It will never look that clean again... 😉


 
Posted : 22/12/2015 6:13 pm
Page 1 / 2