Home Forums Chat Forum Ukraine

Viewing 40 posts - 241 through 280 (of 20,534 total)
  • Ukraine
  • thols2
    Full Member

    Dead man walking

    piemonster
    Free Member

    Hopefully he doesn’t “accidentally” fall out of a window like Maskin Borodin did after criticism of the regime.

    big_n_daft
    Free Member

    I’ll bet you lot were cheering the house over weapons of mass destruction lies and wanting an invasion of whomever to take place soon as possible. From whats been said thus far, any dissenting voices expressing concern would have been descended upon.

    Personally I think all involved in the dodgy dossier should have been up on charges of Treason ( or whatever the most appropriate significant charge is)
    It’s the biggest decision you can take to commit UK lives to inflict extreme violence on another country. You don’t do it on a web of deceit. There needed to be consequences to ensure it doesn’t happen again.

    As for Belarus, it’s hardly a normal functioning state, the influx of Russian troops is clearly to bolster the dictatorship, Russia has to be willing to deploy troops to keep these dodgy regimes in place.

    piemonster
    Free Member

    The Belarus statement is confusing, it’s with Russian support it continues to exist.

    I also can’t see anyone here indicating they want western military intervention, or even cheering a conflict on. Have I missed a few pages of “gosh I hope it kicks off”?

    squirrelking
    Free Member

    Defending Squirrelking ?. Im not defending anyone. Im saying playing such games are a danger to everyone. It is you who appears to be defending the rights of these countries to threaten the security of another and drive them into games of brinkmanship.

    This is how Russia sees it. Wouldn’t it be prudent to take note of those concerns and perhaps pull back.

    It’s Russia playing the games though, it’s been explained how NATO expansion works a few times so I’m not going to rehash this argument, suffice to say Putin is the one rattling sabres.

    But yet again the STW mob is attacking the individual for daring to question the narrative.

    I’d say it’s more stubbornness on your part to see things from the other side. Of course you could use the argument that Russia are defending themselves but where that falls apart is that they acted first. By all means question the narrative but you have to bring facts to the table, even better if they have sources.

    I’ll bet you lot were cheering the house over weapons of mass destruction lies and wanting an invasion of whomever to take place soon as possible. From whats been said thus far, any dissenting voices expressing concern would have been descended upon.

    You couldn’t be more wrong about that actually. Personally speaking of course.

    thols2
    Full Member

    I’ll bet you lot were cheering the house over weapons of mass destruction lies and wanting an invasion of whomever to take place soon as possible. From whats been said thus far, any dissenting voices expressing concern would have been descended upon.

    You couldn’t be more wrong about that actually. Personally speaking of course.

    He’s just frustrated because people keep pointing out how ridiculous his comments are. I doubt that he actually believes that we are all warmongering nutters, he’s just lashing out with insults because he has nothing else to use.

    big_n_daft
    Free Member

    Have I missed a few pages of “gosh I hope it kicks off”?

    Only in the imagination of a few

    A significant conflict with Russia is the last thing anyone wants, at the same time a democratic state falling to an invasion by a kleptocracy isn’t what anyone outside a small Putincentric group want

    So we have the fudges we have now, in effect there is a shadow war going on with each side flexing it’s response and young Ukrainians still dying at the points of contact

    NATO has it’s faults, US foreign and military policy has to be in part countered by Western diplomatic pressure. But when the Russians or Chinese start preparing for a land grab then everyone wants to be their friend.

    big_n_daft
    Free Member

    He’s just frustrated because people keep pointing out how ridiculous his comments are. I doubt that he actually believes that we are all warmongering nutters, he’s just lashing out with insults because he has nothing else to use.

    The internet is a terrible place to have a discussion, I personally let it wash over me. He is right on some points NATO isn’t perfect, US and UK have done things they shouldn’t have for dubious reasons.

    Where the issues centre around Ukraine then the context shifts, a deployment of a third of the strength and probably 2/3 of the fighting capability of Russia in the area on a offensive footing isn’t a defensive act. The precursor activities are not a defensive act. The NATO baddddd argument doesn’t correlate with what is happening. If NATO didn’t exist I doubt the Baltic States would exist in their current democratic form etc

    thols2
    Full Member

    thols2
    Full Member

    shermer75
    Free Member

    Yep, the whole thing is super weird. Is it normal to amass this many troops and then…..just sit there? For weeks? Is it a bit like the phoney war in WW2?

    shermer75
    Free Member

    The Economist reckons they are waiting until the Olympics is finished. What, because Putin’s a sports fan? It jaut seems so incongruous!

    nickc
    Full Member

    Putin has: Attacked Georgia, purposefully bombed Syrian civilians, annexed Crimea at gunpoint, destabilised Donbas, let’s not forget MH17, all the cyber attacks, and the fact that 100% of non NATO Russian bordered states have Russian troops in them…And the US, EU and NATO are being aggressive?

    andrewh
    Free Member

    The Economist reckons they are waiting until the Olympics is finished. What, because Putin’s a sports fan? It jaut seems so incongruous!

    Posted 1 hour ago

    Or because Xi has asked him to?
    Also, let’s the ground dry out a bit and get a bit more tank-friendly.
    China won’t be imposing any sanctions, and if a big as a player as that doesn’t how much effect can ours really have?

    nickc
    Full Member

    Also, let’s the ground dry out a bit and get a bit more tank-friendly.

    Spring is a few months away yet, how long can Russia afford to keep thousands of troops (some of them conscripts) living in tents? And how long before some of those vehicles become un-serviceable. I think time’s not on Putin’s side here.

    big_n_daft
    Free Member

    The Economist reckons they are waiting until the Olympics is finished. What, because Putin’s a sports fan? It jaut seems so incongruous!

    You have just signed a significant bilateral agreement with the host of the Olympics, you don’t think it was discussed? Would the Chinese want one country competing to declare war on another during the games?

    willard
    Full Member

    He only has to be there long enough for the other side to blink and give him the concessions he wants.

    As for the army, they can stay there as long as he wants them to.

    thols2
    Full Member

    The Economist reckons they are waiting until the Olympics is finished. What, because Putin’s a sports fan? It jaut seems so incongruous!

    China wants people to watch the Olympics and see China in a positive light, not to be distracted by a war in Europe.

    big_n_daft
    Free Member

    Spring is a few months away yet, how long can Russia afford to keep thousands of troops (some of them conscripts) living in tents? And how long before some of those vehicles become un-serviceable. I think time’s not on Putin’s side here.

    This is what the Twitter thread discusses, essentially Putin has a small window to make a go/no go decision. After the Olympics, before the conscripts go home, when the ground is good for manoeuvre. But that’s the full invasion scenario, the disrupt and terrorise scenario continues regardless

    As for the army, they can stay there as long as he wants them to.

    With deteriorating combat power and morale, you can’t keep them at a high state of readiness for ever

    nickc
    Full Member

    As for the army, they can stay there as long as he wants them to.

    Lots of them are conscripts and their time’s up in April. Now, he can make them stay on a bit under emergency powers, but Russia is as war casualty adverse as most other countries. (perhaps even more so) One of the reasons Russia withdrew from Afghanistan was the non stop ‘parade’ of returning injured and dead soldiers; it got so bad that they started bringing them back to Russia at night-time, and that was the old communist regime.

    Putin is on the horns of dilemma, the longer he waits, the less threat his build-up is, and less likely he is to be able to invade, he’s deeply unpopular at home, and needs a ‘win’ . So far it’s not worked. he’s running out of options, money, and time.

    kimbers
    Full Member

    As for the army, they can stay there as long as he wants them to.

    Frozen ground is better, tho not an obstacle

    A Little Mud Won’t Stop Putin

    willard
    Full Member

    Granted, but you can continuously move troops in and out. If you are exercising, you can rotate troops out to a rear area or their original station and bring in new troops to continue the training.

    The troops moving would gain experience of having recent training and would then go on to get some rest, the troops coming in would be fresh and would be able to top up their training. As a benefit, while they are switching over, you’d have twice as many troops in place for a limited time.

    If I had doctrine that relied in a significant part of overwhelming numbers of ground troops, I’d be looking at planning a phased relief in place a couple of weeks before I wanted to invade. My existing, trained troops would have had a couple of weeks to relax and pass experience on, the fresh new troops would have had a couple of weeks of training and would not be worn out yet.

    I’d want equipment as well maintained as possible, so maybe bare minimum aircraft activity before that period as the bulk are serviced and made ready, same with IFVs and tanks.

    frankconway
    Free Member

    Picture of liz truss on BBC website – she looks like an extra from Dr Zhivago.

    binners
    Full Member

    pk13
    Full Member

    I tend not to do politics on here but that woman is an absolute cockwomble wouldn’t even make a third rate tictok influencer.
    And sadly Putin has to do something I don’t think he expected the support the Ukraine got and has backed himself into a corner.
    The Ukraine army has dug in and has western support Evey inch of the Russian front will have been photographed.
    It needs a huge diplomacy mind to unravel the mess.

    sobriety
    Free Member

    They had some of her speech on the radio news.

    She didn’t sound as shit as Johnson, despite the stilted delivery.

    How far have we fallen that Liz Truss is a better public speaker than the PM.

    Poopscoop
    Full Member

    I love that childlike, almost vacant look she tends to do when trying to look stern and powerful.

    My lad used to do a similar expression when on the potty.

    tthew
    Full Member

    It needs a huge diplomacy mind to unravel the mess.

    Which presumably is why Liz Truss is in Moscow!

    This thread will be redundant by teatime, you mark my words.

    pk13
    Full Member

    Didn’t sound as shit as Johnson. That should be on the dust cover of her book. She will write a book or someone will for her.
    That photo is the perfect example of why some of Russia believe Putin.
    “See comrade the British still think Russian people dress like the emperor”
    She should have worn a tracksuit and Prada trainers and had her phone above her head way more insta

    matt_outandabout
    Free Member

    My lad used to do a similar expression when on the potty.

    She does look like she is curling one out…

    kimbers
    Full Member

    Truss doing as expected I see

    kimbers
    Full Member

    nickc
    Full Member

    I have some sympathy for Truss here. Lavrov gets to act any way he damn well pleases as he’s part of a mafia state. Like being an arsehole and walking off the platform like a petulant child. It must be pretty thankless trying to “negotiate” with an organisation that will ignore everything until it gets want it wants

    kimbers
    Full Member

    I think Truss has played into Russia’s hands perfectly

    shes given them exactly the kind of pretext they wanted

    matt_outandabout
    Free Member

    *facepalm*

    binners
    Full Member

    I have some sympathy for Truss here.

    You know that then the government she serves in is awash with dodgey Russian money?

    big_n_daft
    Free Member

    I have some sympathy for Truss here. Lavrov gets to act any way he damn well pleases as he’s part of a mafia state. Like being an arsehole and walking off the platform like a petulant child. It must be pretty thankless trying to “negotiate” with an organisation that will ignore everything until it gets want it wants

    I don’t, the Russian behaviour should have been anticipated, she should have prepared properly. She occupies one of the great offices of state, we expect better.

    She needs to drop the rest of her portfolio and focus otherwise the major embarrassments will continue

    dissonance
    Full Member

    You know that then the government she serves in is awash with dodgey Russian money?

    Precisely. Its always annoying when your employer screws you over.

    binners
    Full Member

    I have some sympathy for Truss here. Lavrov

    I agree with you. We all need to feel sympathy with the morons who have, through their own narcissism and egomaniac ambition, not even been arsed to do even the bare minimum of research for the hugely important meeting they were about to attend?

    Poor Liz, eh?

    stcolin
    Free Member

    So, should I start building the shelter this weekend?

Viewing 40 posts - 241 through 280 (of 20,534 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.