Home Forums Chat Forum Ukraine

Viewing 40 posts - 19,241 through 19,280 (of 20,031 total)
  • Ukraine
  • 2
    argee
    Full Member

    Even if Trump wins, i doubt they’ll pull the plug on the Ukrainian support, all of the support is funding US production of armaments and so on, so to pull the plug would basically mean reducing funding to companies that are traditionally republican based.

    It’ll be the usual thing of sounding tough, and doing the same, he’ll have a go at the EU and others to provide more support, but won’t want to reduce the US support either.

    thols2
    Full Member

    This explains how Ukraine managed to rampage into Kursk so easily.

    https://x.com/ChrisO_wiki/status/1823360490615066966

    blokeuptheroad
    Full Member

    Interesting read. It sounds very credible.

    ready
    Full Member

    https://x.com/Iammattaustin/status/1823333607441596646

    Ukraine soldiers reviewing Russian restaurants

    blokeuptheroad
    Full Member

    ^^^Quality! Lol.

    “Delicious food, good service, small parking lot. I couldn’t park my tank”.

    stevedoc
    Free Member

    %100 level trolling .. utterly brilliant

    andrewh
    Free Member

    It’s like the good old days, when the internet was full of videos of farmers towing abandoned tanks and old ladies were taking out drones by throwing pickle jars at them.

    matt_outandabout
    Full Member

    The Ukrainian humour & trolling is a proper win.

    aggs
    Free Member

    Thanks to all the info/ posters on this thread.

    I have been following since day 1.

    My first question?

    Do you think they will now turn right and come in behind the occupying Russians now?

    Keva
    Free Member

    Do you think they will now turn right and come in behind the occupying Russians now?

    This is exactly my thoughts when I first heard of the incursion into Russia.

    DT78
    Free Member

    no. i think they will cause enough of a mess to force russia to redeploy and properly defend its full border. then they may do another incursion or two. once there is suitable chaos they will attack crimea. the sign its going to happen will be the bridge finally getting dropped

    (is my armchair view)

    1
    dyna-ti
    Full Member
    blokeuptheroad
    Full Member

    I started typing but DT78 has pretty much said what I was going to. They have finite resources, especially manpower (far more so than Russia) and they have already committed a huge amount to this. It would be a long way further to go to get behind the Russians which would require a massive and vulnerable logistical tail.

    Also very much an unqualified armchair view. I’m always happy for Ukraine to prove me wrong if I declare limits on their capability and ambition.

    blokeuptheroad
    Full Member

    Looks like Ukraine is now in the frame for the Nord Stream explosion

    I saw that. Hands up, I called that one wrong.

    convert
    Full Member

    Looks like Ukraine is now in the frame for the Nord Stream explosion

    Arrest warrant for man who disrupts income stream of nation invading his country. That’ll be a bad bad look for Germany if becomes a detained and conviction.

    DT78
    Free Member

    i thought there was evidence from one of the nordic countries of a russian ship operating in and around the explosion site with its transponders turned off? very surprised if it was ukraine, given the political fallout at the time, they could not afford to make the EU angry….but hell what do i know?!

    ratherbeintobago
    Full Member

    They have finite resources, especially manpower (far more so than Russia)

    There’s a ‘yes and no’ there. UAF are supposedly far more careful with their manpower than the Russians are, and the Russians are finding out the hard way that “there are always more conscripts” isn’t true.

    kimbers
    Full Member

    That’ll be a bad bad look for Germany if becomes a detained and conviction.

    Poland have already said the guy has gone to Ukraine

    aggs
    Free Member

    Yes, you forget the scale of the maps…. the occupied section front line  is a quite a long way off , so massively huge logistics even static troops!

    I had visions of an encircling movement!

    I think the restaurant reviews is the only time this thread made me smile.

    Saccades
    Free Member

    Russians attacking their own convoy in Russia.

    https://x.com/Seveerity/status/1823770863713263794

    timba
    Free Member

    I saw that. Hands up, I called that one wrong.

    I don’t think that you and I are alone in that error 🙂

    The Wall Street Journal report that President Zelenskyy refused the plan. It was a small group of Ukrainians who carried on despite him, as opposed to the Ukrainian state.

    It’s ironic that the man wanted is Volodymyr Z

    matt_outandabout
    Full Member

    Seems the Ukranians are now turning back west / coming over a wider border area. Mandatory evacuations on the Russian side.

    Hmm.

    matt_outandabout
    Full Member

    And is the German military base lock down / poisoned water linked?

    matt303uk
    Full Member

    Going to be lots of displaced Russians directly exposed to the results of Putin’s “3 day special operation” who know for dam well they’d been living happily next to Ukraine for decades and the whole pretext for all war is BS.

    1
    timba
    Free Member

    Seems the Ukranians are now turning back west / coming over a wider border area

    If that’s the case then it’s easier to retreat sooner than when you’ve engaged a massed Russian force.

    Ukraine has always tried to prioritise its troops, but like everything in the last week, who knows?

    I think that we need to remember that the battles are still raging on other parts of the frontline and that Russia is still pressuring Ukraine in the Donbas

    2
    nickc
    Full Member

    One of the reasons for Ukraine failing to launch a successful summer offensive last year was the lack of experience of it’s more senior battlefield commanders in handling co-ordinated manoeuvre warfare in large scale formations. They’re very experienced (and very successful) at small scale operations – company sized and below. But when it comes to Battalion and Divisional sized formations, they were seriously lacking by comparison to their Russian counterparts. There was  a concerted effort by NATO allied countries to take some of the more senior Ukrainian officers and train them in this sort of warfare. That happened earlier this year in a series of 10 week courses.

    I wonder if anyone could come up with a way that Ukraine could test, or perhaps experiment using the tactics they’ve recently been taught, as a proving ground perhaps, to see if they’ve got the hang of it.

    joefm
    Full Member

    certainly seems that they’re exploiting a breakthrough.  to where or why I don’t know.  There’s a railway a bit further away that’s a key logistics line and an airfield near kursk but I always think these things can be disrupted without physically taking them but moving the front line extends the distance russian bombers have to target from.

    useful article:

    https://newlinesmag.com/spotlight/how-ukraine-caught-putins-forces-off-guard-in-kursk-and-why/

    ceepers
    Full Member

    From my armchair, i can see a strategy of attacking / invading across the border, causing massive local disruption then retreating before the might of the russian army is brought to bear, only to repeat the process in a different russian bordering region a few weeks later.

    Would be a great way to “involve” lots of russians in the fact that a war is going on and continue to pose awkward questions to putin?

    thols2
    Full Member

    Reports of a Russian Tu22 bomber crashing, but nowhere close to Ukraine so could just be shoddy maintenance.

    https://x.com/Osinttechnical/status/1824096761368998111

    nickc
    Full Member

    The last Tu22 were built in the ’70’s (if memory serves) they should’ve been retired years ago, they must be waaaay beyond their airframe life, I’m not surprised that they’re crashing

    Or it’s a Tu22M, different plane.

    fatmountain
    Free Member

    Embarrassing for the Germans bankrolling a state which is blowing up her key infrastructure.

    retrorick
    Full Member

    I thought the Americans were against the Nord stream 2 pipeline from the start of construction which led to a mid build delay then finally completing the build?

    No-one seems to miss it at the moment and the however many billions on build cost is largely forgotten about in the grand scheme of things?

    2
    tthew
    Full Member

    Correct retrorick. I work for Uniper, the largest German power utility company that were rescued by the German government who now own 99 7% of the company. This was due to the Gazprom supply curtailment.

    We owned 1/2 of Nordstream 2 and simply wrote off 1bn euros when it was blown up. See also 4x massive Russian power stations.

    Everyone has 20 20 hindsight, but so many Russian eggs in one basket now seems somewhat poor business policy.

    1
    scuttler
    Full Member

    Bilateral trade is generally a good thing but betting it all on Russians or handing your infrastructure keys to the Chinese are mostly shite ideas and I am not even a geopoliticist (sp??)

    kimbers
    Full Member

    Or it’s a Tu22M, different plane.

    It was a tu22m,

    Be interesting to see what Russia does with the kursk situation, throw everything at all t and by mb the crap out of their own towns as they do in Ukraine?

    With Trump faltering in the US at the moment, it’s not going to well for putin

    tthew
    Full Member

    Well it wasn’t all ‘on’ Russia, there’s a small portfolio of UK power stations, a Nordic fleet including quite a lot of Hydro as well as a lot of German power generation and some novel new businesses. However IIRC 90% of gas was purchased from Gazprom which was a significant risk, especially when you have to purchase all that lost volume at, (market inflated) spot prices! :-0

    scuttler
    Full Member

    All-some-none same as the risk appetite in any portfolio. I guess all the big bollocks O&G leaders thought they were a bigger deal than a narcissistic psychopath mentalist dictator and that money would always trump everything else.

    tthew
    Full Member

    I don’t think that’s fair, the directors at the time were a pretty pragmatic bunch of mainly Germans with a few other level headed Northern European types. But 20 odd years of reliable trade without much apparent political interference is bound to influence any business risk analysis.

    Anyway, sorry, thread diversion. I’ll stop now.

    scuttler
    Full Member

    Me too. I have no idea other than it always seemed a bad idea but then O&G trading probably involves quite a bit of interaction with questionable people and regimes. OK I SHADDAP NOW

    3
    Andy
    Full Member

    One of the reasons for Ukraine failing to launch a successful summer offensive last year was the lack of experience of it’s more senior battlefield commanders in handling co-ordinated manoeuvre warfare in large scale formations.

    From what I have read, partly this, and also largely the huge minefields and lack of air superiority meant as soon as they went into the minefields to clear them the KA52 helicopters were picking them off and they hadnt been given air support of SHORAD to counter this.

    In Kursk Oblast they discovered little entrenched defense and so were able to exploit this.

    Everyone has 20 20 hindsight, but so many Russian eggs in one basket now seems somewhat poor business policy.

    Surely thats largely on Angela Merkels shoulders. German govt could have acted in 2014 after the Crimea and Donbass invasions but chose not to. To be fair the Schultz gov’t has totally got with the programme now.

Viewing 40 posts - 19,241 through 19,280 (of 20,031 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.