Frankly you take a greater risk if you have unsuitable wax for the day than with a second-hand transceiver
Or by going off piste in the first place. Or by going skiing.
I remember there was a bit of a hullabaloo a year or two ago about the vid of the (spanish?) freerider being saved from a decent sized avalanche by his airbag.
Lot of people saying that he was an unacceptable example of risk compensating – he was skiing a slope he might not have skiied if he didn’t have the airbag and rescue crew in the heli.
From a lot of the same people who’d say “I’d never ski out of bounds withour shovel, beacon and probe” as if it’s not exactly the same sort of risk compensation – slopes/risks unacceptable without equipment, acceptable with.
Worse risk compensation if anything – it’s not as if tranceivers are fantastic at mitigating risk either – they’re only helpful if the slope avalanches (i.e. you’ve effed up already); someone gets completely buried (if you can see a leg or an arm you won’t be using the tranceiver), but not too deeply, and hasn’t succumbed to other injuries. Then there’s the skill of those not caught in searching and shovelling.
But