Home › Forums › Chat Forum › The contact-tracing app, accuracy?
- This topic has 518 replies, 138 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by Greybeard.
-
The contact-tracing app, accuracy?
-
outofbreathFree Member
Some interestImg detail here based on facts. I know right..
NCSC inside knowledge
It’s a long read but goes into the right amount of detail.
Thanks @peterno51. The CoronaVirus Podcast touched on some of the pros and cos of each method, good to have the real detail of it.
FunkyDuncFree MemberSo if you don’t like the idea of the NHS app, the next best thing is this.
I don’t get people’s concerns about privacy (unless you do dodgy stuff) This is a world crisis, and one of the ways to end it is using technology, but if people want to prolong lockdown/limitations then choose not to adopt.
Larry_LambFree MemberI don’t get people’s concerns about privacy (unless you do dodgy stuff) This is a world crisis, and one of the ways to end it is using technology, but if people want to prolong lockdown/limitations then choose not to adopt.
Exactly this.
Oh noes the government, who already knows who I am has data to say I think I’m infected.
It then has data to tell them I was near some other phones for a prolonged period of time.
What do people actually think they’re going to do with that? Google/Apple already follows you constantly, it knows where you are (seen the daily coronavirus slides where it showed journey types and locations data for individuals to see where we are mostly spending our time).
It’s a national crisis, it’s part of a toolkit to reduce the risks and it may help us get the **** out of this ridiculous lockdown.
Now whether it will produce meaningful results is another matter but that is why I suspect they have the 18k trackers to use this data as part of the tracing, to try and verify its validity and to try and get the true contacts.
onehundredthidiotFull MemberI’m confused by the trial. Are they asking people who are trailing it to keep a note of who they were close to and for how long and then sampling a number of these “paper” traces to compare to the app? Therefore getting an idea of its effectiveness. Or……..
butcherFull MemberI think on the issue of trust there are some pertinent questions here about why they have taken the route they have. It’s incredibly sad that we’ve reached this point where we’re not trusting our own government on such an important issue, but unless these questions can be answered reasonably, the entire project seems to be somewhere on a scale between incompetence and corruption, and it’s difficult to believe they’re that incompetent.
theotherjonvFree Member@larrylamb @funkydunc
I don’t think people are against an app, but what does the NHSX app do that the G-A app won’t do? (take aside not work as a feature)
So why do we need a Gov developed app and (much) more than that why does it have to be developed by Cummings, Warner, CA, et al
Unless you’ve had your head in a hole for the last 4 years aren’t you a teeny bit suspicious of what they’re up to? Do you recognise that as soon as his name appears near it it stinks of being another con, so why even take that risk?
Yes – it’s a national crisis, so do what is needed, rethink your priorities and do what’s right for the country rather than use this as another opportunity. That comment’s aimed at the Government BTW
weeksyFull MemberUnless you’ve had your head in a hole for the last 4 years aren’t you a teeny bit suspicious of what they’re up to? Do you recognise that as soon as his name appears near it it stinks of being another con, so why even take that risk
Or, you’re exceptionally cynical ?
What are ‘they’ looking to steal/do ?
helsFree MemberJust spitballing here, thinking aloud, grabbing stuff out of the air – steal a referendum result perhaps?
JamzeFull MemberThis is the issue. I’m pro using tech for contact tracing, and put some effort into explaining to friends and family how it doesn’t track your location with GPS, uses a clever Bluetooth LE method (my raffle ticket analogy) and this is what you get when you install it on Android. As the wife just said ‘it’s like someone having a front door key but promising not to use it.’
dudeofdoomFull MemberSo why do we need a Gov developed app and (much) more than that why does it have to be developed by Cummings, Warner, CA, et al
It can highlight Covid breakout hotspots.
That putting the first part of your postcode in bit.
The decentralised is fine in theory but you really need a bit more data to give you more of a view of the infection to help with track an tracing.
Someone need to access to an overall map view.
I’d not be surprised if the nhsx app ends up using the Apple api (as they’ve got control over the Bluetooth in background issue) the api will probably end up with tweaks to t&c to allow for this.
kiksyFree MemberOr, you’re exceptionally cynical ?
What are ‘they’ looking to steal/do ?
Don’t think about it from an individual point of view, its about all the data and big picture that data can create. This was and has been abused in the past.
I highly recommend anyone who’s interested in ‘what can they do with my data?’ to watch this:
theotherjonvFree MemberI don’t think you have to be exceptionally cynical. Just a bit savvy to think that Cummings is toxic and anything associated with him has a good chance of having some kind of ulterior motive. Do you think he’s OK then? You’re not even a bit suspicious of this path vs the G-A one?
As to what they could steal. I don’t know, it’s not my area of expertise. But like I said previously, when I don’t have expertise in an area I try to find out or I get advice from others that know, and this site is a magnificent (if argumentative} resource for that. When i want advice on all sorts I come here and I use my network of friends elsewhere to advise. And then I make up my mind.
So, convince me that Cummings and co are essential to this app working, otherwise given their record I don’t want them anywhere near it.
And don’t do the ‘good of the country’ bit, they don’t need to be involved for that and as above, them being involved immediately limits uptake ergo it’s not for the overall good.
FunkyDuncFree MemberJamze- do you use google maps, Amazon, Strava ?
We are all happy to let these companies stalk us, but something that could help save life isn’t ok ? 🤷♂️
JamzeFull MemberI highly recommend anyone who’s interested in ‘what can they do with my data?’ to watch this:
Be aware some have said these reports on what CA did/were capable of doing were vastly exaggerated. The reporters basically believed the CA publicity material. They didn’t actually deliver. They did misuse Facebook data and try though.
robbo1234bikingFree MemberIm not sure that any data that could be gathered from the app would be that useful for the nefarious purposes suggested.
This would be fine in normal times when peoples movements and activities are normal and therefore the data may have some value but I wouldn’t expect anything useful for the rest of this year so struggle to see how much use knowing where you are and who you have been in contact with is a massive issue.
If it helps to ease restrictions then I cant see an issue. I always assume someone is watching anyway.
nickcFull MemberWhat are ‘they’ looking to steal/do ?
Cummings (as you know) uses data to manipulate results of important national decisions, he’s done it in the North East Mayoral elections, and again for Brexit. He will use data to bend results by targeting specific communities that can heavily influence decisions in a way that he and the the people that pay him feel will benefit them the most. This is not democracy in action.
Cummings (as you know) will use highly controversial data to misdirect and confuse. He’s done this twice now, the £350 million for the NHS on the side of a bus, and the 100,000 test a day for COVID19. He does this using information from data to distract people from what the people who pay him actual are trying to do, by confusing and distracting from the actual purpose of their plans. This is not democracy in action.
These are the people who want your data. They want it from 28 days if you test positive, and regardless they want to keep it forever after this pandemic is finished to perhaps do “research” in the future. Like many on here I don’t think of myself as a tin foil hat wearing conspiracist, but given that there is a workable solution that doesn’t need a data mining company run by friends of Cummings anywhere near it to work, I’d rather have that than this.
weeksyFull MemberDo you think he’s OK then?
MAte i don’t even know who he is 🙂 I don’t do politics… but i simply cannot comprehend what people have to worry about with a location tracing app. As i say, even if it went in and saw i looked for giant dildos on a wednesday morning, so bloody what ? Who cares… Sure, i’d be slightly worried if it started stealing my bank account login information, but i don’t see that.
Whether it can see my google history, my ebay preferences, or even whether i have Strava installled and did a cycle ride, i simply do not care… not a little teensy tiny weeny bit.theotherjonvFree MemberWe are all happy to let these companies stalk us, but something that could help save life isn’t ok
You keep presenting this as the only option and still no-one’s yet answered……
Why does Cummings and Co have to develop this app that will save lives. What is their involvement? The concerns me and many others have will limit the uptake and limit effectiveness.
There might not be an issue but as soon as he’s near it it’s tainted. Avoid that risk, it’s for the good of us all – if there’s no ulterior motive what have the Gov got to lose; if there is then tough titty, you reap what you sow.
weeksyFull MemberCummings (as you know)
Or not… As i say, i don’t even know who he is… nor do i care…. I very much doubt he’s an expert at compiling Google Apps though?
This is not democracy in action
These are not normal times either.
lungeFull MemberVilify me as you wish but there is no way that app is going anywhere near my phone.
The fact that it’ll barely work anyway makes me feel a whole lot less bad about this decision.JamzeFull MemberIs That screenshot real or someone stirring it up ?
Real. I’ve just installed the app on my phone, it says it needs location priv all the time to work.
Jamze- do you use google maps, Amazon, Strava ?
We are all happy to let these companies stalk us, but something that could help save life isn’t ok ? 🤷♂️
As I said, I’m pro using the tech. Yes, I use all those and am happy to trade the benefits I get for them getting my data.
I might be happy to do the same with the Covid app – but why have all these designs and articles saying it uses Bluetooth LE, doesn’t use GPS to track location etc. and then this is the first priv it asks for?
Just tell me why you need it. The app at the moment just says we promise not to use it (but they need it anyway.)
Gut feel is they’ll switch to the Apple/Google implementation pretty quickly. Most folks I know won’t say yes to that priv request, irrespective of if they make the code open, publish lots of info on how it works etc.
nickcFull MemberThese are not normal times either.
said every proto-autocratic state ever. Just because COVID19 is bad, doesn’t mean that we should set aside hard won (and easily lost) rights freedoms and democracy. Have no doubt, that Dominic Cummings absolutely thinks he knows better than you about what’s best for you, and he’s working damned hard to make sure he has the tools to manipulate the Tory party into making those decisions.
theotherjonvFree Member@weeksy – then do a favour and either find out, or don’t accuse people of being exceptionally cynical when by your own admission you don’t know what / who you’re discussing. Your position has no weight without. Sorry if that’s harsh.
I very much doubt he’s an expert at compiling Google Apps though?
No, he (his colleagues) are the experts in big data harvesting and manipulation, with a strong suspicion (you may say exceptional cynicism) of doing so for nefarious ends. Yet he’s the go to for the Gov to develop an app THAT BASICALLY ALREADY EXISTS ELSEWHERE.
Something about looking like a duck and sounding like a duck I’m afraid, and even if it isn’t even the suspicion it’s a duck makes me run away.
mogrimFull MemberSenior figures told HSJ that it had been hard to assess the app because the government was “going about it in a kind of a hamfisted way. They haven’t got clear versions, so it’s been impossible to get fixed code base from them for NHS Digital to test. They keep changing it all over the place”.
That has a real death-march project stench to it – I can only imagine the pressure the developers are under to get the solution out the door, then they find yet another bug, another version out the door following yet another all-nighter, and should we be ordering pizza with pineapple tonight to stave off scurvy?
weeksyFull Memberthen do a favour and either find out, or don’t accuse people of being exceptionally cynical when by your own admission you don’t know what / who you’re discussing.
Not knowing who he is doesn’t make me thick. We happen to disagree on a subject, that’s fine, that’s OK. I doubt me reading about him would being the same levels of emotion in me that it does in you, but i’m far more laid back and have no political affiliations or agenda. People who have an agenda see things how they want to and already go into any subject with a particular level of disdain/hatred before the topic even begins.
Don’t worry about being harsh, this is a passionate subject, as long as you’re not nasty, it’s all good 🙂
theotherjonvFree Memberput another way weeksy
if it was announced that Mike Ashley was about to take over Liverpool and sack Klopp and install Alan Pardew as manager. Would someone saying they have no interest in football and don’t even know who Mike Ashley is but they’re sure it’ll be OK convince you 😉
nickcFull MemberNot knowing who he is doesn’t make me thick.
But it does make you ignorant (not in the pejorative sense) You can’t be expected to make a decision without all the information you need. People here are trying to give you the information you need.
It’s like you trying to influence a mate about which bike to buy when he knows **** all about bikes. You could play it straight and help him, you could play it crooked and use his ignorance to your benefit. Cummings is in the second group…Every Single Time.
fatmountainFree MemberFrom a government that was won on the back of dodgy data practices, no thanks.
I’m all for a tracing app but not something that has cummings finger prints on itThis.
martinhutchFull MemberIf this is developed as well as other NHS IT projects, I think we can expect something with a minimum functionality bang on time for the next pandemic at the end of the decade.
butcherFull MemberAs i say, even if it went in and saw i looked for giant dildos on a wednesday morning, so bloody what ?
They don’t have the slightest interest in what dildos you’re looking at, or you as an individual, so you can carry on with that. The developers might have a giggle, but in a database of tens of millions of people, it’s unlikely anyone is going to be looking at your individual data at all.
The concerns are on a collective level and how that data can potentially be used to manipulate society as a whole, and we know the people working on this app have a past history of doing this.
reluctantjumperFull MemberReal. I’ve just installed the app on my phone, it says it needs location priv all the time to work.
We’ve just had a message at work about our staff who work on the IOW. Due to some of the contracts we have we are not allowed to have personal phones on us during work hours, we’re issued with a company dumb phone with no GPS chip, camera damaged (we did have camera-free phones but they’re hard to get hold of these days) and Bluetooth is not allowed to be switched on. We’ve been told under no circumstances are we allowed to install it as the app logs far too much location information. If a Google/Apple app appears they’ll look at that as we use Google for our delivery HHT’s and they are secured by Google to our agreed standards, maps doesn’t work on them but it can log location when we do a delivery/collection. This means that we can prove where we were to customers but there’s no data log of our routes.
I’m all for using technology to help us get over this and find a new normal but the current solution has far too many question marks over it’s safety, effectiveness and implementation.
weeksyFull MemberThe concerns are on a collective level and how that data can potentially be used to manipulate society as a whole, and we know the people working on this app have a past history of doing this.
Go on, i’m curious…. how can they manipulate society with this data ?
DelFull MemberI could push all the privacy concerns to one side for the greater good for an app that works. This one won’t.
gonefishinFree MemberOr not… As i say, i don’t even know who he is… nor do i care….
Then you should probably go and find out.
It really is rather depressing that we have good reason to trust huge multinational corporations like Google and Apple over a democratically elected government. I won’t be using the app.
JamzeFull MemberReal. I’ve just installed the app on my phone, it says it needs location priv all the time to work.
We’ve just had a message at work about our staff who work on the IOW. Due to some of the contracts we have we are not allowed to have personal phones on us during work hours, we’re issued with a company dumb phone with no GPS chip, camera damaged (we did have camera-free phones but they’re hard to get hold of these days) and Bluetooth is not allowed to be switched on. We’ve been told under no circumstances are we allowed to install it as the app logs far too much location information. If a Google/Apple app appears they’ll look at that as we use Google for our delivery HHT’s and they are secured by Google to our agreed standards, maps doesn’t work on them but it can log location when we do a delivery/collection. This means that we can prove where we were to customers but there’s no data log of our routes.
I’m all for using technology to help us get over this and find a new normal but the current solution has far too many question marks over it’s safety, effectiveness and implementation.
Did a bit of digging, the location priv is necessary for Bluetooth LE. They should just be more transparent about it.
‘BLE permissions
In order to use Bluetooth features in your application, you must declare the Bluetooth permission BLUETOOTH. You need this permission to perform any Bluetooth communication, such as requesting a connection, accepting a connection, and transferring data.
You must also declare the ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION permission, given that LE beacons are often associated with location. Without this permission, scans won’t return any results.’
nickcFull MemberGo on, i’m curious…. how can they manipulate society with this data ?
Cummings (as you know) uses data to manipulate results of important national decisions, he’s done it in the North East Mayoral elections, and again for Brexit. He will use data to bend results by targeting specific communities that can heavily influence decisions in a way that he and the the people that pay him feel will benefit them the most. This is not democracy in action.
From my earlier post. In the pre-Brexit run up, Cummings was employed to try to make sure we left, He was funded by groups with common interests in making sure that we left because those groups don’t like the heavily regulated (towards consumers and away from industry) world that the EU are trying to create/enforce. Cummings did that largely by getting data (probably illegally) from the biggest source of data he knew at the time; Facebook. He then used that Facebook data to determine who in the electorate could be manipulated into thinking that Brexit would be in their interest, or vote to come out through a sense of jingoism or patriotism. This was hugely targeted, unregulated and hidden (ie he pretended that it had come from other sources than his own campaign group; this is probably illegal)
Cummings now is at the heart of this Tory administration.
Larry_LambFree MemberSeriously, how the **** does having location data (which already exists) on someone influence an election.
Your likes, interest and how you think etc I understand but locational data? Think theres a bit of over thinking it going on here.
To be fair although I dislike Cummings a lot he has the brains for this sort of thing as has been highlighted. Sort of like the criminal using his abilities for good.
Next you’ll be telling me 5G spreads Covid19.
Just to add we’re not the only country not adopting the A&G API… so does Cummings work for those countries too?
SuiFree MemberFunkyDunc
Member
So if you don’t like the idea of the NHS app, the next best thing is this.I don’t get people’s concerns about privacy (unless you do dodgy stuff) This is a world crisis, and one of the ways to end it is using technology, but if people want to prolong lockdown/limitations then choose not to adopt.
i report on the joizoe app, why hasnt this been more popular and/or interated into what .gov are [trying] doing?
thisisnotaspoonFree MemberGo on, i’m curious…. how can they manipulate society with this data ?
Did you hit the snooze button through the whole Brexit/Trump/Cambridge Analytica thing?
If google want’s to know that I visited a shop and then send me adverts for similar stuff that’s one thing. If it want’s to go next level and infer that I might be interested in something else as a result because it can now guess my demographic, then that’s also fine with me. No a million miles removed from the billboard adverts on the Hammersmith flyover for IBM servers and corporate lawyers, and the adverts at Moorgate in Bury for a pet crematorium.
That data available to a politician is downright dangerous though. We’ve seen time and again that a little data, on a lot of people lets them target those on the margins very specifically. Do that better than the opposition and you can win elections without 90% of the population ever seeing your election adverts which is both cheaper and helps you avoid scrutiny.
A bit like the (is it an urban myth, IDK) story that Boots rewards card system can tell if your pregnant with a higher degree of accuracy than pissing on a stick by the subtle changes in your shopping habits.
Seriously, how the **** does having location data (which already exists) on someone influence an election.
Because the whole point of “big data” is you don’t need much detail to find the patterns.
It could be something random like people who ride bikes but also go to Burger King are more likely by 0.3% to Vote one way than people who don’t ride bikes but got to BK. But people who ride bikes but also go to Primark are 0.05% more likely to vote the other way. Add in enough of those correlations and you can start to make some remarkably solid predictions.
Given that is Cummings day job, do you not find it in the lest bit suspicious that he want’s to collect way more data?
At least with the Apple/Google system even if the data was collated then it’s by an independent-ish third party that I’d imagine wouldn’t want to lose it’s reputation in a data breach or using it for nefarious purposes. And they’ve developed a system that from the ground up doesn’t centralize that data in the first place.
The topic ‘The contact-tracing app, accuracy?’ is closed to new replies.