Also, while being mindful that ‘MTFU’ often isn’t the best advice as knee damage can make a mess of the rest of your cycling life, there’s a big difference between simply not wanting to push a harder gear and out and out grinding. I think most riders (who aren’t sufferfest junkies) would default to an easier life on an easier gear if it was available, whether they need it or not. I know I was worried about losing my 26×34 bottom end when I went 1x but it turned out I simply using it as a crutch rather than actually needing it. Doing some rides actively avoiding shifting down too far is probably the best way to assess this for yourself. Plus, spinning out due to having too low a gear and breaking traction can be a real problem in low grip conditions.
These days when the 11-36 cassette is no longer the limit and 42-50 are commonplace at reasonable weights (although there are cheaper, heavier choices too) there’s a 1x to suit most peoples’ climbing needs and pockets. Whether it also suits their flat out fast needs is different matter though, and the compromises balancing the two ends are where it tends to fall apart for some.
Obviously, doubles and triples do still exist even though frame choice to use them is now restricted for general MTB frames, but I can’t see the manufacturers of touring, tandem and bike packer type frames where they’re really useful designing them out.