Home Forums Chat Forum Stone Roses new single . . .

Viewing 40 posts - 81 through 120 (of 123 total)
  • Stone Roses new single . . .
  • Junkyard
    Free Member

    That was sh*t.

    You can write shit but you cannot avoid the swear filter

    SO i could not do that for the c word but i can write ****

    ninfan
    Free Member

    Sounds like the credits should read Lyrics & music: N.Gallagher

    DezB
    Free Member

    Heaton Park was fantastic. And yes it was like a karaoke session for middle-aged men!

    Can’t think of anything more fantastic than that 😆

    howsyourdad1
    Free Member

    Shit

    howsyourdad1
    Free Member

    Oh I see yes you can

    lunge
    Full Member

    Not great but not as bad as I feared it would be was my review.

    ads678
    Full Member

    All for one, one for all…… what rhymes with all…….ball, call, tall, wall…….yeah wall, build a wall, **** deep lyrics man!!

    That really is poor. I lasted 1 minute and 11 seconds.

    GregMay
    Free Member

    Mih, a whole bag of mih.

    Coyote
    Free Member
    DezB
    Free Member

    The Mash has it…

    Sums up Radio One last night that’s for sure.

    ctk
    Full Member

    Song shit, worse than shit.

    Its not the lyrics its the whole thing.

    sharkattack
    Full Member

    Wow it’s bad. It’s really, really bad.

    They’re before my time so I don’t have any emotional investment. Still, I’d rather hear good music than whatever that is. It’s so witless and juvenile.

    lovewookie
    Full Member

    it reminds me of watching 90’s MTB films.

    good because it reminds me of that, but generally the soundtracks to early MTB films were a bit pants.

    Bikepimp
    Free Member

    It’s mince:-(

    scaredypants
    Full Member

    weak – or at least the first half was; didn’t make it to the end 🙁

    docrobster
    Free Member

    I had 2 more enforced listens this morning on the radio. Still crap.
    Am also amazed with the all/wall rhyme. Talk about simplistic.
    My 17 yr old daughter played this on Spotify immediately after and I think I prefer it.

    colournoise
    Full Member

    I don’t mind it.

    Not their best, but harks back to simpler times and sublime tunes before the dreaded spectre of Zeppelin clouded their minds.

    rone
    Full Member

    It’s not bad, but it’s lazy. They’ve done nothing to advance or refresh their sound.

    The first album remains what it is, but I’ve desperately been waiting for new material but it’s not looking good.

    carbonfiend
    Free Member

    I like it and I suspect knowing the Roses & Ian Brown there’s more to it than that. I have an old friend that is really good mates with Ian Brown if I can get hold of him I will ask him.

    timmys
    Full Member

    Sounds like the credits should read Lyrics & music: N.Gallagher

    Unfortunately it sounds much, much more like an L. Gallagher effort

    lobby_dosser
    Free Member

    Outtake from the lost Seahorses album. Poor.

    Shurely you meant the Shirehorses. I thought it was a parody

    simons_nicolai-uk
    Free Member

    and they must think this is the strongest track from their new material? Awful and even worse than that it’s an earworm so I keep finding it running round in my head and hating myself for it.

    Guitar is nice. But that’s about it. I remember the disappointment of The Second Coming but I’ve grown to like a few tracks on it over the years. This is worse than anything on there.

    On the plus side, the new Super Furries track is ace, DESPITE being about football.

    DezB
    Free Member

    The SFA track is one purile ear worm!

    Malvern Rider
    Free Member

    I never heard my nan say ‘if you can’t say anything nice then say nothing at all’. But I grew to admire her for embodying the phrase in manner.

    My lips are sealed 😐

    Drac
    Full Member

    It’s **** shite.

    Malvern Rider
    Free Member

    ^ 😆

    chubstr
    Free Member

    This has all for one in it…..rip-off?

    Maybe Ian Brown is a massive Musketeers fan

    howsyourdad1
    Free Member

    Bryan Adams is a really sound guy. I know!

    Ro5ey
    Free Member

    It’s alright

    But doesn’t have any edge or bite… Bit happy clappy really

    Should have gone with with a grumpy old bloke vibe…. Cus that’s us, thier old audience … Is it not?

    chakaping
    Full Member

    Well they’ve got the Roses sound right, definitely closer to the first album than Second Coming – which is good.

    The lyrics are surprisingly basic. I never really pondered over the words to their hits, but they always seemed nicely enigmatic and very distinctive to them.

    Go on, you know you want to hear this now…

    chakaping
    Full Member

    And they had a lot to live up to, imagine if they’d come back with something like this…

    llama
    Full Member

    It’s growing on me

    deadlydarcy
    Free Member

    Me too.

    seosamh77
    Free Member

    You’d imagine they’ve an album in the pipeline and this is just the worst song put out there as a teaser. Well you’d hope its something like that and there’s better to come.

    Quite dissappointing though, as the stone roses stuff is good, personally I much prefer browns solo stuff though, but you’d think, given that, they would try something different and a bit more nuanced and have a much more developed sound instead of trying to hark back to an era. (sounds like they had a meeting to discuss the type of sound they want to go for rather than just go and jam and develop tunes naturally, it sounds overly contrived,)

    I’ll final reserve judgement till I hear what other stuff they’ve got out.

    Don’t hold out much hope mind you, I don’t think this new stuff 20 years down the line works very well. The Pixies new stuff was a bit crap anawl.

    seosamh77
    Free Member

    llama – Member
    It’s growing on me

    POSTED 1 HOUR AGO # REPORT-POST
    deadlydarcy – Member
    Me too.

    POSTED 1 HOUR AGO # REPORT-POST

    This kinda thing is a daily mash article waiting to happen, stop kidding yourselves! 😆

    mikey3
    Free Member

    Well that fragile happiness,keeps me from forgetting.

    nealglover
    Free Member

    Should that have been played on 45, rather than 33 1/3

    A huge portion of the forum will have no idea what that means![/quote]

    I think you are vastly underestimating the middle aged bloke population of this forum.

    simons_nicolai-uk
    Free Member

    I like it until the vocal comes in. Unfortunately that’s only 14 seconds.

    simons_nicolai-uk
    Free Member

    and they did write some decent lyrics – I still really like this.

    rone
    Full Member

    So, It’s a beautiful thing… Is than attempt to rescue the first single’s reaction?

    Much better but feels more an album track than a single.

Viewing 40 posts - 81 through 120 (of 123 total)

The topic ‘Stone Roses new single . . .’ is closed to new replies.