Home Forums Chat Forum Scottish politics thread

  • This topic has 964 replies, 79 voices, and was last updated 1 day ago by tjagain.
Viewing 40 posts - 921 through 960 (of 965 total)
  • Scottish politics thread
  • argee
    Full Member

    2026 is a lifetime away in politics, the SNP need to just get back to working out how to govern properly and reduce internal strife, pretty much like every other government!

    scotroutes
    Full Member

    Matt, would you be happier if the government limited pay increases to public sector workers like, err, teachers?

    1
    matt_outandabout
    Free Member

    Yes. Mrs_oab didn’t want the pay increase. She’s top of the payscale, and frankly we can live in a nice place and do nice things on her part time wages. She would earn more than me if full-time.

    Her and my view is a) it’s the conditions of teaching that is the issue, not lack of pay b) there was going to be cuts to pay for this and c) a focus was needed on the poorest in our society.

    tjagain
    Full Member

    Don’t think this is down to UK government

    It is.  They control the scottish budget.  any scottish tax raising powers are tiny and designed to be unpopular / unusable

    I expect we may see a change in government…

    Pretty certain.  The SNP need a spell on the back benches to recover their mojo and sort out the simmering battle between left and right

    ~Expect a labour / tory coalition

    squirrelking
    Free Member

    ~Expect a labour / tory coalition

    Never gonna happen, I’d put a fish tea at Nardinis or Fishworks on it.

    2
    poly
    Free Member

    Yes. Mrs_oab didn’t want the pay increase. She’s top of the payscale, and frankly we can live in a nice place and do nice things on her part time wages. She would earn more than me if full-time.

    Her and my view is a) it’s the conditions of teaching that is the issue, not lack of pay b) there was going to be cuts to pay for this and c) a focus was needed on the poorest in our society.

    laudable though those views are, the re won’t be many who even with those views simply donate all the extra income to the needy! (Which does have the advantage that you can decide how it’s spent).   Whilst she may not need/want the money right now – pay rises matter because they also affect your pension.  Having the ability to afford to quit work early is a genuine luxury – especially in professions where the rest of the conditions are crap.

    TroutWrestler
    Free Member

    Teaching unions may well be registering an official dispute with COSLA and the SG by lunchtime on Monday. COSLA and SG have been essentially ignoring the issue of a pay settlement this year since January, despite an agreement at the end of the 2022 industrial action that a settlement would be negotiated and in place before 1 August 2024. One excuse is that they were too busy negotiating with other sectors.

    Sounds like amateurs unable to plan ahead. I don’t hold the teaching unions in very high regard either.

    tjagain
    Full Member

    Looks like the Scottish government were looking to a spending boost from westminster to cover shortfalls.  Now Reeves is continuing with austerity they are in big trouble with the 22 billion hole and spending cuts meaning a lower scottish govwernment budget not higher hence big troubles making the books balance which Scotland has to do unlike the rest of the UK

    matt_outandabout
    Free Member

    laudable though those views are

    It was self preservation to.

    One of the reasons for her job being cut has been to pay for the other teachers pay rise in the local authority. So a pay rise has cost her.

    Across classrooms for the next few years you will now see fewer teachers and fewer classroom assignments. You will see early years hours cut.

    While I get that people want more money, it’s going to make the conditions they work in much harder.

    1
    tjagain
    Full Member

    Never gonna happen, I’d put a fish tea at Nardinis or Fishworks on it.

    My bet is that labour will be the biggest party but even with the lib dems will not be able to get close enough to a majority .  What will they do then?  Given the precedent on councils they will make a deal for tory support

    1
    poly
    Free Member

    My bet is that labour will be the biggest party but even with the lib dems will not be able to get close enough to a majority .  What will they do then?  Given the precedent on councils they will make a deal for tory support

    the same as the SNP currently do, and have done in the past – rally support on a case by case basis rather than simply whipping stuff through a coalition.   A pact with the tories would be political suicide in Scotland.    There’s not enough media attention of councils for your average punter to know what goes on there, and each one is slightly different anyway.

    I’m not sure that Scottish tories will do that well anyway – will in part depend which leader they elect both north and south of the border and how well SKS manages to pin the blame for Labour “pain” like tax rises and service cuts on the tories mismanagement.   Assuming the tax increases in the budget are Inheritance and Cap Gains those may not hurt average Scots as much as those in the SE so if they manage to manipulate the media that could play well.  If he taxes pensions then I’m sure swinney will be quick to point out it’s a U.K. not Scottish decision.  (FWIW I would do all three and abolish the plan to protect assets from care costs – they SHOULD be able to find a message that resonates with ordinary people who don’t have enough wealth to worry about these things).

    tjagain
    Full Member

    the same as the SNP currently do, and have done in the past – rally support on a case by case basis rather than simply whipping stuff through a coalition.

    I don’t think they will be close enough in seats to do this even with lib dems.  thats my bet.  SNP have only been one or two short or a majority.  I think labour will be 10 – 20 short even with lib dems.  Thus they will not get stuff thru without SNP or tory support

    1
    scotroutes
    Full Member

    I’m coming round to the notion that the SNP will again win the most seats at the next HE (I think Starmer is poisoning the water for Sarwar). Who forms the next government will then come down to how much Labour want to showboat. If they keep voting against a SNP First Minister then they are basically aligining themselves with the Tories at that point. If they put forward their own candidate then they’ll likely need Tory support to get them elected. I guess the Tories could refuse to do so, at which point some sort of electoral stalemate ensues. In a perfect scenario, SNP need Alba to form a government 🙂

    https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/24540930.poll-salmond-relected-labour-take-power/

    squirrelking
    Free Member

    In a perfect scenario, SNP need Alba to form a government 🙂

    I think given their form they would be doing well to retain their single seat given they haven’t retained, let alone won, any in an election to date.

    poly
    Free Member

    I don’t think they will be close enough in seats to do this even with lib dems.  thats my bet.  SNP have only been one or two short or a majority.  I think labour will be 10 – 20 short even with lib dems.  Thus they will not get stuff thru without SNP or tory support

    it changes the dynamic – but even if you are 10 short you can still get “good stuff” done.  The tricky thing is the budget, but other that that unless your policy is bonkers some other assortment of parties will vote/abstain to ensure they aren’t ridiculed for blocking it.  Salmond’s first term was a  47/129 minority with no formal coalition.  Obviously the greens will not be falling over themselves to help the SNP this time round – but if they think the alternative is tories in coalition they might be willing to abstain where necessary.

    1
    tjagain
    Full Member

    I’m coming round to the notion that the SNP will again win the most seats at the next HE

    I’ll be surprised.  Needs quite a turnaround IMO  I think the SNP will lose a fair few seats but I also think labour are close to their ceiling.  20% core vote and 20% floating ish

    Lots to happen between now and then tho for sure but I think the SNP will ( perhaps rightly?) be blamed for the coming cuts.  I think the SNP overspent with an eye to a generous budget from Westminster 🙂

    tjagain
    Full Member

    Salmond’s first term was a 47/129 minority

    They did have support from both Greens and tories – Goldie wanted the Scots Parliament to work and got a bit out of them

    scotroutes
    Full Member

    The SNP will be blamed for cuts but will point to the number of folk also complaining about cuts in England and Wales. Those are obviously the fault of the UK Govt so shifting at least some of the blame will be easy.

    tjagain
    Full Member

    Oh dear –  misuse of Scots government cars.  Neal Gray has been using them to go to football matches and made a halfhearted apology claiming he did nothing wrong

    Small beer in the grand scheme of things but he has to go for this.  Big test for Swinney here.  The SNP government are showing all the signs of a party in power too long

    Scotland’s health secretary – and Dons fan – Neil Gray has apologised for appearing to act “more as a fan than a minister” when he took ministerial cars to Aberdeen games on three occasions in six months.

    In response to mounting criticism from opposition parties at Holyrood, and on the day that his planned reforms to social care were delayed yet again, Gray told MSPs:

    What I have reflected upon and what I apologise for is the appearance that I have been acting more as a fan, not getting the balance right, by attending Aberdeen games and attending others.
    But he insisted that he had not broken any rules and that all the matches were recorded as official government business, with summaries of the discussions that took place to be published.

    He revealed that he’d attended a total of six matches accompanied by family members and guests in the chauffeur-driven limousines, the three Aberdeen ones mentioned in a report at the weekend, but also other matches including a Scotland game.

    With the Scottish Conservatives demanding further investigation, this will be a real test of John Swinney’s commitment in Programme for Government to strengthen the ministerial code, and to let independent advisers decide unilaterally whether something is worth investigating as a breach.

    alanl
    Free Member

    Yes, Government business my arse. They get a decent wage, they can probably get free tickets in hospitality if they make a phone call, yet they have to go further and use the Government car to get there. Some of these MSPs/MPs do not deserve to be where they are, their sense of what is right has gone missing.

    kormoran
    Free Member

    “all within the rules”

    Ffs

    1
    tjagain
    Full Member

    I do love the description as “chauffeur-driven limousines”  as far as I know they are perfectly ordinary cars like Octavias but with a driver.  I’ll bet the Grauniad lifted the story right from one of the anti SNP papers

    Doesn’t everyone take their kids with them when they are on official government business?

    1
    somafunk
    Full Member

    What an amateur, he should have taken the helicopter

    1
    kelvin
    Full Member

    So dull… it’s “employee uses work printer for non-work letter” territory… not exactly “multi million pound contract given to mate’s new company that was set up this morning”.

    2
    tjagain
    Full Member

    exactly – and the apology is shite.  thats what will do for him.  He should have made a proper apology and paid for the usage of the cars

    HOw long till he is on the back benches – I say a week and Swinney will take a load of damage for it

    2
    poly
    Free Member

    as far as I know they are perfectly ordinary cars like Octavias but with a driver.

    don’t think they’ve ever been Octavia’s, former cabinet sec lived across the street for a while – were Superbs.  But now Tesla’s/other EV/hybrids.  Yes not limos basically glorified taxis… but then other MSPs fell down over claiming taxis for non official business.  The limos probably aren’t actually as big a problem as conducting business at a football match, especially one which your family were attending!

    squirrelking
    Free Member

    What a fanny, send him to Patna.

    politecameraaction
    Free Member

    Same bucket as the Kier Starmer Arsenal freebies to my mind – the arrogance undermines public trust. You’re paid enough to buy your own tickets and travel to the football ffs!

    3
    somafunk
    Full Member

    What a fanny, send him to Patna.

    That’s a bit much, I’d send him to Waterside first and he does it again then Patna

    1
    tjagain
    Full Member

    Ive only just found out there is a Patna in Ayrshire 🙂  I wondered why you wanted to send him to India?

    1
    poly
    Free Member

    Same bucket as the Kier Starmer Arsenal freebies to my mind – the arrogance undermines public trust. You’re paid enough to buy your own tickets and travel to the football ffs!

    actually I’d give much more slack to SKS – he can hardly go and sit in the terraces without a major security operation.  I doubt most people at the game would even recognise Neil Gray!

    1
    gordimhor
    Full Member

    “What a fanny send him to Patna”

    He’s an Aberdeen fan send him to Darvel

    tjagain
    Full Member

    I would agree poly.  SKS handled it badly but had valid reasons  ~Gray has none

    irc
    Free Member

    The train is good enough for one SNP MP going to the football why does Gray think he is so special he needs a govt car and driver?

    https://www.scottishdailyexpress.co.uk/news/politics/snp-mp-mhairi-black-caught-26840334

    intheborders
    Free Member

    I for one can’t get excited by a Minister using an official car for what some of us may see as incorrect.

    It’s a bit like the folk who think politicians shouldn’t claim any expenses because “they’re paid enough” – shows a basic ignorance of how expenses work (for anyone) and a lack of critical thinking.

    tjagain
    Full Member

    Its not so much that although its clearly wrong usage but its the lies and the arrogance that will do for him

    tjagain
    Full Member

    Well Gray appears to have got away with it?

    tjagain
    Full Member

    Sarwar has broken with Starmer again – this time heavily critising the refusal to compensate WASPI women.  Thats at least the second time Sawrwar has publicly and strongly come out against westminster policy
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cpq9vr8x077o

    Sarwar’s call is not the first time he has publicly diverged from UK Labour since Sir Keir took office in July.

    The Scottish Labour leader has previously spoken out against the two-child benefits cap, which the prime minister has refused to scrap.

    He also said means testing for the winter fuel payment was too strict after the UK government scrapped universal coverage for millions of pensioners.

    Is this because Sarwar has actually got some principles or is it because he is feeling the pressure from the SNP of being outflanked?  For sure Starmer is acting as  a huge drag on Labour votes in Scotland and giving the SNP easy targets.  I can easily see labour not being the largest party after the next Holyrood election as Starmer is rapidly becoming toxic up here

    irc
    Free Member

    I was a bit surprised that after Gray being in the news another minister thought it was ok taking her son to the old firm game in the chauffeur limo.

    Her excuse being it was an official visit to discuss the pyro problem. So, if you are working why take your family?

    tjagain
    Full Member

    they ain’t limos but yes.  Must have missed that one

Viewing 40 posts - 921 through 960 (of 965 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.