Home Forums Bike Forum Purgatory 2.3 – Rim Poll

Viewing 10 posts - 41 through 50 (of 50 total)
  • Purgatory 2.3 – Rim Poll
  • SOAP
    Free Member

    En321’s not 317’s

    stcolin
    Free Member

    And the award for not reading the op goes to…

    st colin – Member
    Superstar EVO’s, EN321’s, tubes, Minion/HR

    Where’s my prize? 😆 Sorry, been a long day so far!

    mmel
    Free Member

    EN521’s, tubeless captain at the rear and a purg out front with a tube at the moment

    plyphon
    Free Member

    FWIW I will be using tubes….. can I get away with 717 rims yet?! 😆

    iainc
    Full Member

    great feedback, thanks all. I was starting to wonder if these tyres were a bit big for my 719’s but it appeears not 🙂 My Nobby Nics can stay on the shelf till Spring.

    pitchpro2011
    Free Member

    Mavic en521 purg front high roller rear

    ocrider
    Full Member

    Purg 2.3 front(new) purg 2.2 back(old)
    The new 2.3 seems to come up massive compared to the rear.

    Same set-up tubeless here on some charger experts.

    To me there’s no visible size difference between the two tyres, although the tread pattern is a slight changed (smaller centre block on the 2.2)

    lehutch
    Free Member

    running Prug 2.3 front and rear on Arches…(Original, not EX)

    Tubeless and dead easy to pump up first time with track pump

    ell_tell
    Free Member

    Purgatory front and The Captain rear – both on DT Swiss 445 d. Not sure of the width but reports suggest 22mm

    wurzelcube
    Free Member

    2.3 Purg on a flow rim and a 2.0 captain on a flow rim – all tubeless
    with just yellow rim tape.

    Purg inflates with just the track pump

Viewing 10 posts - 41 through 50 (of 50 total)

The topic ‘Purgatory 2.3 – Rim Poll’ is closed to new replies.