Prince Andrew, what a cowardly little ****.

Well, conclusive proof that the”frolicking in a bath” incident never happened thanks to this big budget reenactment by a couple of Grislaines mates!

Wtf? I can categorically attest to the fact that mere plebs like myself have frolicked in similarly sized baths. In the past anyway.

Perhaps prince’s require bigger baths to folic in?

Picture showing two people in a bath to demonstrate that two people couldn’t fit in that bath.

I assume this is aimed at the old age readership that struggles to get in to a bath these days? It can’t possible be aimed at anyone who’s had sexy time anywhere other than a bed?

That bath looks bigger than the back seat of an old mini! 😀 😉

Picture showing two people in a bath to demonstrate that two people couldn’t fit in that bath.

Literally. The lady on the left could quite easily put her feet in the mouth of the guy on the right. I’ve heard there are actually lots of videos of this kind of thing (between consenting adults) online.

The Daily Telegraph has long been a stranger to the truth.

I’ve managed to get two in a bath before, never with a photographer in tow though.

Maybe Prince Andrew has be sponsored by Only fans as a means of repaying the £12million and this is the opening film.

And everybody knows that people who don’t sweat don’t have baths.

To find that on the front page of the Telegraph is, totally bizarre. And the logic is also backwards. Surely if you wish to bath communally and avoid “sex frolicking” you would want a big bath? And vice-versa.

That bath looks bigger than the back seat of an old mini!

Most places have more space than the back seat of an old Mini, but I was 18 and didn’t worry about such things…..

I don’t get why the defense of the Andrew from the Torygraph?  Surely even their die hard readership are sick of him?  Whats in it for the torygraph?

Were the barclays in Epsteins little black book?

I don’t get why the defense of the Andrew from the Torygraph?  Surely even their die hard readership are sick of him?  Whats in it for the torygraph?

Not talking about Zahawi being a tax cheat and Rishi knowing about it and still appointing him?

theotherjonv

But they could run some rubbish about immigrants, leftie lawyers or all those public servants shirking work if its supposed to be a dead cat!

MSP might be closer

I dunno – just seems weird

To find that on the front page of the Telegraph is, totally bizarre

Honestly thought the front page was a Photoshop job.

Bizarre.

<p class=”dcr-h26idz”>Prince Andrew has been urged to challenge his legal settlement with a woman with whom he is accused of having sex when she was a teenager.</p>
<p class=”dcr-h26idz”>Alan Dershowitz, an American lawyer who himself was previously accused by Virginia Giuffre of sexual abuse, told the Guardian that the Duke of York should attempt to revisit an out-of-court settlement he agreed with Giuffre a year ago.</p>

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/jan/29/prince-andrew-urged-to-challenge-settlement-with-virginia-giuffre

I wonder of anyone will educated him on the “Streisand effect”

I wonder of anyone will educated him on the “Streisand effect”

Come on baby let’s close the door<br aria-hidden=”true” />Come on baby let us sweat some more
Let the good times roll

Honestly thought the front page was a Photoshop job

I think the people in the bath are genuine (and bizzare) but the picture has been photoshopped, badly, to hide the photographer who would otherwise be visible in the multiple mirrors around the bath.

And everybody knows that people who don’t sweat don’t have baths.

My dog doesn’t sweat. Phisically incapable… But he sure does need a bath from time to time!

To readers of the Telegraph, sex is something only ever done lying down, (usually in the dark)..There is no way two people could lie down in that bath. Ergo, sex in that bath is impossible.

I don’t get why the defense of the Andrew from the Torygraph?  Surely even their die hard readership are sick of him?  Whats in it for the torygraph?

You see when I saw the twitter storm about it I assumed that the Telegraph saw just how ridiculous it was and were undermining him like this:

I wonder of anyone will educated him on the “Streisand effect”

rather than suggesting the picture was helpful to his cause?  On the other hand, one way or another its got them clicks and so will be seen as a success in the Monday morning review meeting!

To readers of the Telegraph, sex is something only ever done lying down, (usually in the dark)..There is no way two people could lie down in that bath. Ergo, sex in that bath is impossible.

Only sex with your spouse.  I’m sure quite a few telegraph readers have been more adventurous with the au pair or the tennis coach 😉

Perverts.

Wow.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-64812549

Allegedly the Royal family are evicting Harry and Megan* so they can house a money poor pedo* in luxury.

Monarchy. A force for good.

The place is called Frogmore Cottage but needs a rename?

Pedo Palace?

*That doesn’t really concern me, they are doing ok for themselves.

** I know cougar, I know.😉

Keeps him close, they can keep a better eye on him! And save money!

And H&M – the gift that keeps on giving. Being evicted from a house you don’t live in. Notified 24hrs after Waaagh went on sale too (if the tabloids are to be believed).

#NiceOneCharlie

🤣

Comes as no surprise that Charles wants to protect his paedo brother as his illigitimate kid committs the far greater sin of marrying a non white woman

And the cap offers lap it up 🤷

his illigitimate kid committs the far greater sin of marrying a non white woman

I don’t believe there is any evidence that Charlie Windsor’s son is illigitimate or that Charlie has a problem with his daughter-in-law’s skin colour.

But since I have next to zero interest in the Royal Family I am happy to accept that I might be completely wrong.

So is there any actual evidence of Harry’s illegitimacy and Charlie Windsor’s alledged racist attitude towards his daughter-in-law?

Should go well…

EXCLUSIVE: Prince Andrew is considering giving a new tell-all interview to a US broadcaster, as he seeks to find a way back into the royal fold after his Newsnight disaster. Sources close to the Duke confirmed: “Nothing is off the table.”
Full story ?
https://t.co/ZIKHPNmyXA

— Russell Myers (@rjmyers) March 10, 2023

They should interview Andrew under full studio lights, just to make him perspire a bit…. that’d make a better story.

Oh I thought the thread bump was going to be this story:

https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/king-charles-blocks-prince-andrew-yoga/

Apparently the privy purse has been funding a £32,000/year full time live-in yoga tutor for Prince Andrew and now Charles has told him he needs to pay for it himself.

How the other half live, eh?

Up to his neck in it again. Wonder how much it’ll cost the tax payer this time?

I wonder how many more sick and twisted serial sex offenders they need to befriend/protect before the penny drops with all those thick as two short planks royal family “fans”?

I wonder how many more sick and twisted serial sex offenders they need to befriend/protect before the penny drops with all those thick as two short planks royal family “fans”?

Im fairly sure that megan markel will remain the target of their hatred because being brown is a far worse crime than sex trafficking children

Guardian story with court docs… https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/jan/03/jeffrey-epstein-documents-list-pdf

He’s been reported to the UK Police, which I guess will be quietly brushed under the carpet/No case to answer.

The release of the documents containing Andrews name hasn’t actually added anything that we didn’t already know, has it?

Perhaps even more important to her role in Epstein’s sexual abuse ring, Maxwell had
direct connections to other powerful individuals with whom she could connect Epstein. For
instance, one such powerful individual Epstein forced Jane Doe #3 to have sexual relations with
was a member of the British Royal Family, Prince Andrew (a/k/a Duke of York). Jane Doe #3
was forced to have sexual relations with this Prince when she was a minor in three separate
geographical locations: in London (at Ghislaine Maxwell’s apartment), in New York, and on
Epstein’s private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands (in an orgy with numerous other under-aged
girls). Epstein instructed Jane Doe #3 that she was to give the Prince whatever he demanded and
required Jane Doe #3 to report back to him on the details of the sexual abuse. Maxwell
facilitated Prince Andrew’s acts of sexual abuse by acting as a “madame” for Epstein, thereby
assisting in internationally trafficking Jane Doe #3 (and numerous other young girls) for sexual
purposes.

This is from page 129 of the documents (https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/24253264/epstein-documents-943-pages.pdf), it’s from a document under a subheading named “Jane Doe #3 Circumstances” within a document named Exhibit C and a heading called ‘Factual background’.

Does anyone know if this means this is the ‘factual background’ as Jane Doe 3 sees it or whether this is background agreed by all parties (ie. no one is disputing it happened who is party to the case – i’m sure Prince Andrew would state it didn’t happen).

The release of the documents containing Andrews name hasn’t actually added anything that we didn’t already know, has it?

I think that this scuppers his denials more than anything…

Oh the Grand Old Duke of York
He had 10,000 men
He had some underage women too but he doesn’t remember them

The upper classes have incredibly selective memories don’t they?! Sunak can’t recollect much, if anything, about what he was doing during a major public health crisis. Johnson can’t remember attending any parties or even remembering much about the definition of a party. And ol’ Andrew can remember exactly when he ate a pizza but not anything about hanging out with a billionaire on a private island.

Remarkable.

Nice one @Klunk, I was about to post that. You’ve got to admire Republic’s tenacity (although how far it’s going to get them is debatable).

To improve his PR standing, apparently he’s been advised  to become a patron of the Stroke Association.