Its a good policy IMHO
The vital characteristic of this policy is its universal application, without there is no policy. One of the arguments central to this policy is that it instantly and very effectively removes all stigma associated with a child receiving free schools meals, significantly increasing the uptake on school meals (plus removing a source of embarrassment for a child) I heard a Tory minister, of all people, make this very point this morning on the TV.
So it comes as some surprise JK that you like this policy, as you have in the recent past very strongly opposed my support for the universal application of benefits, arguing that assistance should only be directed at those in need. When I pointed that one of the advantages of universal benefits was that it removed any stigma associated with receiving them you accused me of getting close to demonising “benefit scroungers”.
I dont see why there is a stigma to benefits …why do you think there is ? You seem to be getting close to demonising “benefit scroungers” there
Cannot be arsed arguing about universal benefits but help should be there for those who need it rather than for all* IMHO…many disagree.
* you end up giving money to folk who just dont need it which is worse than incurring “admin” costs
Posted 4 months ago
I would have expected you to have argued that free school meals should only be available to “those who need it”, considering how more than once you’ve critised me for supporting the universal characteristic of benefits. You appear to have changed your mind, which is excellent news.