2 Dhfs will be quite draggy won’t they – especially in 2.5wt size?
I find the aggressor 2.3 is pretty good until it gets slushy (greasy is fine). I thought the 2.5 is meant to be better in mud than the 2.3 though.
Well I’m currently running a shorty wt front and dhf wt rear, both in 3C maxx terra as my winter set up and I would say that the rolling resistance is surprisingly decent. Certainly a lot better than Magic Marys IMO. But thats a matter of perspective, I normally run aggressive tyre set ups.
The 2.5 aggressor is better in mud to an extent, but because it has the same closely spaced tread pattern as the 2.3, it’ll still quickly clog up with mud in muddy conditions.
If you’re comfortable with the aggressor and it suits the trails you ride, then I would just go for the aggressor.
I would go for a 2.5wt on 30mm rims IMO, the 2.3 will become too squared off and can affect the grip when leaning over, plus the lack of sidewall protection will expose your rims to more damage (Don’t ask me how I know).
Also, aggressor wt available for £37: https://www.highonbikes.com/maxxis-aggressor-wt-exo-tr-mtb-tyre-folding.html