Home Forums News Manitou have made the FS again. No really.

Viewing 32 posts - 1 through 32 (of 32 total)
  • Manitou have made the FS again. No really.
  • 1
    Ben_Haworth
    Full Member

    A statement piece – a concept bike, if you will – that is equal parts nostalgia and innovative passion project of a few cycling industry insiders made …

    By ben_haworth

    Get the full story here:

    Manitou have made the FS again. No really.

    5
    Rubber_Buccaneer
    Full Member

    Looks like there has been a horrific telepod accident involving a 90s Manitou and Pace RC100

    2
    tall_martin
    Full Member

    There aren’t many bikes I don’t want to ride.

    But I’d be keen not to ride that bike.

    1
    nuke
    Full Member

    Was it actually a competition where they get some primary school kids to draw mountain bikes, then the prize was manitou would build the favourite design?

    1
    crazy-legs
    Full Member

    I so wanted one of those 90’s FS Manitou bikes. I think Mountain Goat licensed the design too, I remember reading a review / publicity piece on it in either MTB Pro or MBi.

    /rose tinted specs

    #ThoseWereTheDays

    1
    cookeaa
    Full Member

    You’d have thought that if you were having a custom frame made (especially to commemorate a bit of an icon) you could spec’ the headtube the length you wanted and not need to run 2″ of spacers…

    Rigger boots, flat cap, grease applied with an old copydex brush, I think we’ve hit peak hipster bike mechanic…

    nickc
    Full Member

    Not many bikes are genuinely eye wateringly ugly, but that is eye wateringly ugly. Disturbing

    7
    somafunk
    Full Member

    I had a Manitou HT back in 1994…….always wanted a FS though.

    Nope… I lied. I had a Marin Indian Fire Trail, but I pretended it was a Manitou

    1
    reeksy
    Full Member

    …Manitou lead the charge…

    Even the spellchecker in MS Edge has picked that up [Facepalm emoji]

     

    I actually quite like the looks. Better than that E-Cotic thing.

     

     

    fahzure
    Full Member

    Direct to wallhanger. Could have spent that £20K building trails.

    captain_bastard
    Free Member

    Marin licensed the original design, I know I had one, a Pine Mountain FRS. The concept was good, simple short travel, enough to provide some comfort but without the complication of (what were at the time) unreliable shocks.  The execution however… required constant fetteling and attention to access the meagre travel on offer

    1
    matt_outandabout
    Full Member

    That’s. Umm. Challenging in the looks department.

    matt_outandabout
    Full Member

    And as above, you’re commissioning a custom frame, so why diddy headtube and all sorts of odd angles and spacings?

    2
    Roly
    Full Member

    Look how they massacred my boy !

    twistedpencil
    Full Member

    A friend had one of those when I was studying A Levels.  It was what got me interested in mtb beyond messing around in the local woods.

    I remember it being eye wateringly expensive back then, and not significantly more capable than my Raleigh Moonrun!

    3
    mogrim
    Full Member

    The “by Ben Haworth” byline is a bit of a lie, isn’t it?

    1
    sharkattack
    Full Member

    It looks better than the new Cotic and I’d rather ride this than anything designed for tarmac.

    Just give me a silver suit and RoboCop helmet.

    radbikebro
    Full Member

    I actually quite like the looks of that – probably just the purple and chrome more than anything else but I’d definitely have it in my garage.

    mert
    Free Member

    I i wonder if it’ll crack as effectively as the originals?

    5
    BadlyWiredDog
    Full Member

    I don’t have the energy to wade through that extraordinarily verbose press release you’ve lazily published in full. Could you not just have, you know, summarised it rather than inflicting a load of near-unreadable garbage on your readership?

     

     

     

    wbo
    Free Member

    If it’s like the old ones the headtube will fall off anyway, then you can add a custom one.

    dirkpitt74
    Full Member

    So the only time he uses a torque wrench is to put the rotors on?

    I don’t mind the looks too much – but they should have just used higher rise bars.

    No dropper?- I’m out…..

    And what’s with the odd dual seat post clamps?

    3
    tenburner
    Full Member

    Impressive word salad

    desperatebicycle
    Full Member

     Could have spent that £20K building trails.

    I don’t think that’s the idea of that Yootoob channel. I suspect they make a bit of cash from it and use it to do another grim bike build, purely for entertainment value. Fact that their bikes divide opinion shows it works. They did a completely gold bike build didn’t they? That was the last time it came to my notice anyway.

    chrismac
    Full Member

    You have to ask why they bothered and who wanted to spend the money to design and develop it.

    beaker
    Full Member

    I’d happily have the one from the nineties to go with my RTS, but that thing up there is awful.

    Gunz
    Free Member

    That press release gave me a headache, do they ever read these things back to themselves?

    bigrich
    Full Member

    “industry insiders”

     

    what industry? cos its not bikes.

     

    BadlyWiredDog
    Full Member

    I don’t think that’s the idea of that Yootoob channel.

    I vaguely remember reading a piece about the whole Dream Builds channel a while back. From – hazy – memory, Gee Milner, who makes the things, did the first one on a vague whim and was mildly astonished when it went viral and the rest – to paraphrase a lot of waffle – is history and also, I think, co-promoted with anyone who’ll pay him to feature their bike/frame in one of his videos, though I’m just guessing at the last bit, but you know, capitalism, the internet etc.

    I guess the appeal is that they combine a sort of zen-like calm to the watcher. In reality the endlessly smooth process is utterly at variants to most attempts at building up a modern frame, where you’re endlessly trying to thread partly bled, poorly sealed hydraulic brake hose through a labyrinthine internal routing maze before haplessly connecting the wrong hose to the wrong lever then realising the whole thing routes through the headset anyway, or something like that.

    If you were making a parody video – which it’s absolutely ripe for – you’d ‘wake up’ at the end to find the reality of a load of expensive, semi-butchered components strewn across the workshop floor with the mechanic banging his head against the wall in frustration.

    Also, the thing where he slathers most of the contents of a tube of grease onto the headset bearings. Do people really use that much?

    boco
    Full Member

    Crikey, let’s hope they don’t bring back the Prst1!!!

    jkomo
    Full Member

    Why do you grease the outside of a bearing. Honest question, cos aren’t they the bits that stay still, or is it to keep water out.
    Headset and spacer choice is bad. It’s as far as I’ve got.

    mick_r
    Full Member

    Is it grease or anti-seize? (Shimano anti seize also has a brush in the cap) I sometimes use a very light smear of anti-seize / anti-fretting compound to stop non-press fit bearings creaking in the frame / housing.

    Looks like it was a fun overall project so why not, but I’d be more interested in seeing a video of the frame being designed and made rather than just some dull final assembly.

Viewing 32 posts - 1 through 32 (of 32 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.