Large 4×4 reversing over my bike

For anyone interested:

The insurer ruled that the driver was at fault on the basis that he reversed into a stationary object that was not directly behind his car.

I was asked to supply two independent quotes and gave details of the original spec of the bike. If I could not supply two quotes I was told that the insurer would ‘assess the cost’ themselves using the internet.

The back end and frame were written off and I have received a cheque minus depreciation for the damages.

Good news. However, I’d challenge the “depreciation” unless the insurance company can value one in the depreciated condition. It’s not like second hand cars.

Result, when you get your bike fixed if not already .
Try and look after it this time.

Fantastic news.

Something nice in the sales……

Merry Christmas! 🙂

I’ve done it twice – doesn’t say much for my driving………….. 😳

Well done. Definitely question the depreciation on the parts. As for all the stupid comments on here from others stating its 50:50, your fault etc just shows you the lack of understanding around insurance claims and what is pretty much black and white or perhaps how many teens and trolls spend all day on STW. Oh that and IT peeps driving audi’s and riding Orange 5’s…sorry couldn’t resist that one.

If you were happy with the settlement, sounds like you got a sensible and just outcome.

Insurers in “doing ok for once” shocker