It’s a play area for townies

Just saw this in the Guardian.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/nov/10/new-national-park-wales-local-opposition

What does STW think?

I’ve read it, but what do you think?

It’s thought provoking.

I thought that too.

People go to these places already so I don’t see what the issue is.

Seems like another typical PC view of North Wales.

I think it needs some thought.

I don’t think, would it be okay if i cogitate?

Pondering might be more acceptable?

I’ll mull it over, if it’s ok with you?

From the article, most of the concerns might be addressed if you could encourage most people to get there by public transport, cycling or on foot.

I think the general answer is that you can’t please all of the people. I was puzzled by the idea that a butcher would close at the weekend because it was so full of visitors that the locals couldn’t get in. Surely customers are customers?

All National Parks are play areas for townies. We have to decide if we want them to be viable self sustaining communities or theme parks.

That requires rules around affordable local housing, second homes, access/parking, and what businesses and commercial activity is to be allowed. Having lived and worked on the edge of the Peak for nearly 25 years now, I’m pretty sure we haven’t got it right yet.

I was puzzled by the idea that a butcher would close at the weekend because it was so full of visitors that the locals couldn’t get in.

If their pies are up to scratch, it would be worth them opening on a Sunday if the visitor numbers swell.

I was puzzled by the idea that a butcher would close at the weekend because it was so full of visitors that the locals couldn’t get in. Surely customers are customers

I think they were suggesting that the people visiting the area brought their own food so didn’t go into the butcher, they just caused congestion preventing locals from getting in.

I was puzzled by the idea that a butcher would close at the weekend because it was so full of visitors that the locals couldn’t get in. Surely customers are customers?

How many weekend visitors are buying meat from a butcher?

Have you been to Llangollen? Lovely but hardly a secret is it.

I don’t think being a National Park attracts more visitors. In theory it’s a mechanism for planning control. So it’s unlikely to be popular with local farmers etc.

“Play ground for townies”. I think that covers most of us here 😉

We have to decide if we want them to be viable self sustaining communities or theme parks.

That’s a weird either/or choice. It will be increasing difficult to make a living out of hill farming, and diversification and adding value will be easier if there’s more attention on the area.

Perhaps the park could offer a “park, ride and meat scheme”. £5 to park, bus into the village and voucher for 3 sausages or a chop.

With the current lack of funding available for outdoor recreation in Wales, see NRW’s closure of trail centre facilities and redundancies, how will this be staffed/funded?  Just drawing a line around a piece of Wales and giving it a label, or actually creating a properly resourced, staffed, funded national park? It feels like a marketing exercise on the cheap.

That requires rules around affordable local housing, second homes, access/parking, and what businesses and commercial activity is to be allowed.

While the area isn’t a national park, what rules are there? If you’re loaded, it’s far easier to move into the area now and have a go at playing ponies* than it’s likely to be after NP designation.

[ * apologies to any of an equestrian bent ]

“Townies”

Disgusting, hypocritical term. Country folk often have to live in urban areas, plenty of farm workers commute from towns because of all the well off who have inflated rural house prices have changed the social set up in villages* – for good or for ill.  Does this mean towns are dumping places for “yokels”? They are certainly “playgrounds” for country folk.  A lot of these comments will be from folk pulling the ladder up behind them.

Oh and the area is not national park material.

*If the village is still there – there was one beneath the water in the photograph.

Lots of people come here but we don’t do anything to take advantage of that to our benefit doesn’t feel like a great argument against things.

Tourists are already coming to the area, you’ve already got tourist attractions through the larger towns in the area (Bala, Llangollen, etc) and places like Vyrnwy, Degla, etc that are already attracting people to the area.

My bigger concern with the proposal is the lack of focus, the other national parks have a consistency, this area covers quite a variety of area what is the thread that ties this together?

All National Parks are play areas for townies. We have to decide if we want them to be viable self sustaining communities or theme parks.

That requires rules around affordable local housing, second homes, access/parking, and what businesses and commercial activity is to be allowed. Having lived and worked on the edge of the Peak for nearly 25 years now, I’m pretty sure we haven’t got it right yet.

this

Lol at reeksy!

I’m always intrigued as to how many people national park status actually brings in, vs it being a lovely area with cool mountains etc.

If you want investment in a rural area then park status is probably a good way to achieve that. But that potentially has downsides like increased property prices.

Same thing is happening in Dumfries and Galloway with loads of no posters up on land when I was there last week. It gave the vibe that a particular sector was objecting that is generally quite vocal, so it would be interesting to hear what other sections of society think

These changes bring opportunities, plenty will take them and be successful. Others will continue to be left behind, but it’s important that public services continue to support those communities that don’t benefit.

In Dumfries I rode a free community bus which was local authority funded, it was brilliant, linking local villages with the bigger town and also creating a sense of community as people incorporated it into their day, whether it was a trip to a local shop or as part of a dog walk. A little thing that made a big difference

Perhaps the park could offer a “park, ride and meat scheme”. £5 to park, bus into the village and voucher for 3 sausages or a chop.

Pork and ride?

There’s lots of local opposition to the proposal for a 3rd Scottish National Park in Dumfries & Galloway too. That’s based on what’s already been happening in the Loch Lomond & Trossachs and in the Cairngorms. There are also similar tourism pressures being felt in the Scottish Islands and along the coastal NC500 route, so many of the issues are occurring regardless of National Park status.

Being a NP isn’t going to make things worse or better just because of a designation.

“­people born in industrial or built-up areas don’t deserve the pleasure of enjoying the countryside”.

That’s me told ……….

I live in a town not far from the border, I go to Wales quite a lot. I love it there. That’s all.

Pork and ride?

Winner 🙂

“This is a local national park, for local people…”

Balancing the needs of the local community with those of the wider Costa card carrying public will only lead to enshittification, I reckon they should go hard and open it as a Lord of the Rings theme park. Llangollem, barely need change the signs. Townies have to dress as Orcs to visit, locals get to be Elves and earn a modest honorarium for telling people to bugger off back to Mordor. Ultimate aim is to produce enough rings that everyone disappears and the Balrog can go fishing in peace.

Play ground for townies

Is exactly why the first national park was created.

Pork and ride?

None of those dirty urban habits in the countryside please.

has sparked a furious debate over who the countryside is for

As with everything, it’s for whoever has the power and money to make it theirs.

There are more townies, and they have more money.

Pork and ride was winning this thread until…

Llangollem, barely need change the signs.

So then @TwirlipoftheMists you’ve had longer than most to digest The Guardian article, what do you think?

Err. That both sides seem to have a good case.
My first thought was Park = Good but reading the article made me think that was a pretty superficial opinion. I genuinely wondered what the STW hive mind would make of it.

I don’t live near to the proposed park but I do live quite close to The New Forest. I’ve always liked going to the forest but I’m not quite sure I’d like to live or work there full time.

It seemed an odd thing to be considering given the closures to other facilities being reported.

I was puzzled by the idea that a butcher would close at the weekend because it was so full of visitors that the locals couldn’t get in. Surely customers are customers?

I live in a small seaside town, a few of our high street shops, Greengrocers etc, will shut for a few weeks during peak summer season for tourists as their business dries up.

From what I can tell theres a three reasons, day trippers tend not to buy, for example,  their fish on a day out unless its battered and served with chips, those staying longer tend to stock up in supermarkets before getting here, and a notable number of locals who provide the bulk of business stop visiting the high street to shop as they dont want to walk more than a few minutes or so and they often cant park close enough when its busy.

I genuinely wondered what the STW hive mind would make of it.

Dont bother with an NP and associated fanfare, but instead improve access rights and infrastructure allowing any development to happen organically with plans/funds in place to improve infrastructure if visitor numbers do increase.

I live right bang on the border of where this park would be.

Currently you can go out to the area and not see anyone all day, ride on the roads and they are empty etc

Not sure what benefits this would bring for locals really.

Keep it the quiet secret area it is already

The infrastructure in the area wouldn’t cope either.