Home › Forums › Bike Forum › If you thought mandatory full facers were a pain for UKGE…
- This topic has 429 replies, 90 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by orena45.
-
If you thought mandatory full facers were a pain for UKGE…
-
chakapingFull Member
Spot-on Bob. And Parr’s a stubborn so-and-so who doesn’t seem to handle criticism very well – and isn’t prepared to give a clear reason for a seemingly arbitrary and frustrating rule.
Fortunately the series will still sell out and be the best in the uk
Let’s see shall we? He might be in for a shock.
RorschachFree Memberstubborn so-and-so who doesn’t seem to handle criticism very well
Ain’t that the truth!!!
garyFull MemberI reckon their intention here is to go after the the riders insurance in the event of an accident. If there was a Llangollen type incident, the riders insuree will be held liable instead of the race organisers. As long as they can prove no negligence on their behalf the liability will sit with the rider. If they make sure they have insurance then they dont have to worry about either them or the rider being out of pocket (unless the insurers deny claims and say the rider was negligent etc)
But that would be 3rd party insurance, not the “i broke myself” cover that has been described. Which is why the whole thing is a farce unless UKGE can present a clear statement of the minimum cover required. Until then I’m in the “not entirely daft idea, but implementation barely thought through” camp.
legendFree MemberYou could always just self-insure of course. I’ll happily cover myself for up to £x in the event of an ouchie
scottfitzFree MemberFYI for both QECP enduro in 2015 you will not need PI or a FF helmet. If you would like to do/use that is fine too. See you all in May then 😉
IdleJonFree MemberThis sounds as dodgy as a dodgy thing. PA has never been a prerequisite for bike racing – any more than you need it for a gig just in case you enter the mosh pit! Anyway, hopefully someone can follow my badly worded thought processes here..
There are extremely strict FCA rules on how the insurance industry sells Personal Accident (and other options, of course). For instance when you buy car insurance the sales person will offer PA, but must make it clear that it’s an option and in no way make judgements about how much the customer may need it. (eg the salesperson wouldn’t be able to say anything like “You’re a single, unemployed mum, just think about how useful £1000 would be if you broke your arm in a car crash.” The company would risk a fine for that.) The company can not suggest that customers MUST take a product that isn’t needed, as with banks and Payment Protection for instance.
I wonder if the insurance company being used as the “preferred” supplier by UKGE may be at risk of an FCA fine by being complicit in the suggestion that PA is a necessity for any form of bike racing. I guess that this may only be the case if UKGE are receiving a referral fee from the insco seeing as it is the organiser who is demanding the PA, not the insurer. Again, I wonder how the FCA would view the situation – I’ve never been involved in that side of insurance. I might ask around in work on Monday.
NebFull Member“Have you been mis-sold personal protection insurance? Were you told it was compulsory? Call now for no win no fee contract…”
Said in a really posh tv voice..
joefmFull MemberJokers. So everyone who breaks their leg or whatever at ukge will get a payout from this pa insurance and the underwriters of said policy will seek to cover their costs from the events insurance resulting in more claims and increased costs.
yacobyFree MemberSlightly confused by this.
I pay quite a bit of tax towards the NHS. I also *now* pay a reasonable amount through my work for private insurance (That doesn’t mention competitive racing. I just get x tens of thousands of pounds of private treatment. I don’t think what I was doing even matters). From what I can gather it costs my employer about £600 per year (and I just pay the tax on it). i.e. it isn’t the cheapest of insurance, but I have no idea if it is valid for UKGE. They have no details.
From my recent derp accident (fractured neck, trees are terrible things :P), the private stuff isn’t the stuff I care about. I was in A&E, had lots of scans (6 xrays, CT scan, MRI scan) and then was taken by ambulance to another hospital that was more geared up for dealing with my injury.
It was the Monday before I even considered the insurance (or rather at the time the regret that I didn’t have it :P). But the scary stuff had been dealt with, I had a diagnosis and a doctor had told me the expected problems (i.e. no sugary required, will heal up fine etc). I had spoken to my boss and everything was fine.
Spoke to people at work later and what insurance doesn’t cover (because it can’t) is the A&E stuff at crazy times of night when an ambulance is needed to move someone. What is does cover is the after care – Which the NHS provides, but just not as fast.
It would have been great if they had described the rational behind this. From my experience I can’t see why *for me* it is needed. I am happy with the level of risk and the level of cover I have.
Slightly disappointed.
thisisnotaspoonFree MemberEven if they have been recommended by UKGE and have a business agreement with them? It would be easier for them to avoid paying out would it not?
The insurance is paying out to you as per the terms of your poilcy. That doesn’t stop you then suing UKGE as well. But you’d have to prove the accidnt was their fault to get anywhere,w hereas the insurance is just that, insurance. The insurance company can then sue UKGE if they think it was their fault to recover what they paid out.
You could always just self-insure of course. I’ll happily cover myself for up to £x in the event of an ouchie
You’d have to cover yourself against 3rd party claims too (you crash, die, and your bike tumbles down the hill and takes out a scout group including a footballing prodidgy who then sues for his future loss of earnings, which is why all these policies cover for huge sums like £5million.
I don’t really see the problem, I pay ~£120 a year for sports insurance, covers about £4k of sailing kit and £5million 3rd party (and a few thousand if I lose any limbs, kill myself etc). No events offer individual inrurance, it’s get your own policy or don’t turn up.
mrhoppyFull MemberYou’d have to cover yourself against 3rd party claims too (you crash, die, and your bike tumbles down the hill and takes out a scout group including a footballing prodidgy who then sues for his future loss of earnings, which is why all these policies cover for huge sums like £5million.
No you wouldn’t, that’s covered anyway. This is purely personal accident and the proposed level of cover and terms appear to be shit.
brFree MemberI don’t really see the problem, I pay ~£120 a year for sports insurance, covers about £4k of sailing kit and £5million 3rd party (and a few thousand if I lose any limbs, kill myself etc). No events offer individual inrurance, it’s get your own policy or don’t turn up.
Yes, but the Organiser has to somehow review every riders policy to ensure that it fits their (minimum) criteria, and (to properly be compliant) really contact each insurance provider/broker to ensure it is a current policy (to cover against the ‘buy and cancel’ crowd).
Or force each rider to only buy from their preferred supplier…
kimbersFull Memberno ones being forced to use their preferred insurer, theyve made that quite clear from the start.
the justifications and communications have been vague, but it was mentioned in Parrs interview on pinkbike b4 xmas and discussed on the facebook page at least once before xmas too
everyiones just getting all grumpy coz they feel their right to be uninsured and injure themselves has been invaded
chakapingFull Membereveryiones just getting all grumpy coz they feel their right to be uninsured and injure themselves has been invaded
You put the case against quite well for someone who seems to support the rule.
😉STATOFree Membereveryiones just getting all grumpy coz they feel their right to be uninsured and injure themselves has been invaded
The problem is that the minimum level of cover being required doesn’t actually provide any benefits to the majority of individuals. I’ve been riding bikes for 20years and fell off plenty of times that have meant I couldn’t go to work. However I’ve never broken a bone so the basic cover required by UKGE would have paid out nothing as its a fracture policy, not loss of earnings. How is that ‘helping’ me?
If it’s intended to protect you from/against other riders in event of rider-rider collision then I’d understand, but I don’t think thats the intention.
kimbersFull Memberafter breaking my hand at rd 5 of ukge last year Im all over the insurance thing
however I wouldnt have got any cash for my latest effort
no broken bones but was much more serious than the hand
although hand 4-6 weeks off work, face i had to have this morning off for stitches out, so maybe that makes sensesteve is going to have a statement about what the minimum level actually is this afternoon
dont get me wrong this should all have been given out with the original notification
I still think people are over reacting massively just because the info’s been poorly disseminated, its still a brilliant series
theflashFree Memberhttp://singletrackworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/2015-time-check-for-superenduro/
🙁
When there are no races what will we all do?….mikewsmithFree MemberWell after an exhaustive selection process I reckon kimbers is now the ukge pr/spokesman….
kimbersFull MemberDo u think the ukge preferred insurer will give me a discount/ kickback 😉
brFree MemberWhen there are no races what will we all do?….
Go and build our own tracks and ride/race them, using Strava as the timekeeper? Always handy living in a rural location with lots of FC land 🙂
plecostomusFree MemberHas anybody seen if the statement on the insurance situation been posted yet?
fr0sty125Free MemberIt hasn’t there was a FB post 8 hours ago from Steve saying he was waiting on one more piece of information.
kimbersFull Member??
?
2015 UK GRAVITY ENDURO
Navigation Menu
Home > News > UKGE Statement on Insurance
UKGE Statement on Insurance
Following the British Cycling decision to stop supporting Enduro in 2014, UKGE has subsequently taken a long, hard look at all things to do with safety, liability, insurance & everything Enduro.
In December, we chaired the first meeting of all Enduro organisers in the UK and 2015 will see us working together for the greater good of UK Enduro. We were aiming to set up a Federation for 2015 and like with BC’s membership, the plan was to incorporate insurance in with the membership. However, timescales meant that getting the Federation up and running for 2015 was not viable, but we will be putting a lot of time into moving things in the right direction. Our involvement with Bespoke financial is because they were the only insurance company willing to offer us advice on setting up the federation and to attend the meeting in December with the other organisers.
The aim of setting up a UK Federation for Enduro, is to standardise the quality and safety of all UK Enduro events, and to keep racing attainable for all levels. There are a lot of organisers jumping on the Enduro bandwagon and with such exponential growth of the sport, it is hard to ensure that standards are being maintained. This is maybe one of the reasons why SuperEnduro is taking a step back for 2015.
In 2011, when UKGE was born, the series was not at the forefront of MTB in the UK. However, it has seen significant growth and development on all levels, especially the riders and bikes. The past two seasons have seen such a massive rise in “Enduro” in the UK, we have truly struggled to understand British Cycling’s decision to drop the discipline. Particularly as UKGE were fully behind BC involvement in UK Enduro.
Before British Cycling’s decision not to endorse Enduro, UKGE had the safety umbrella of being insured by the UK’s governing body of cycling. British Cycling also gave us a set of safety guidelines to work to and this was primarily the reason behind the full-face helmet decision. Losing BC’s backing was a real set-back and this lack of support leaves organisers of Enduro in the UK in a vulnerable position. Please note that British Cycling membership and race licences are only valid at BC-sanctioned events. This means that the insurance on your BC membership is null and void for all Enduro events in the UK from 2015 onwards.
HAD British Cycling endorsed Enduro in the UK, then the plan was to start using the National ranking points system that is currently employed in Downhill and Cross Country. This would have meant we would have required every rider taking part in a UKGE event to have had Gold membership and a BC Race Licence, at a cost of £109 per year. Gold membership also offers a level of personal accident insurance, as we are currently asking our racers to take out.
At UKGE, we have always made safety our utmost priority. Because of this and the lack of a governing body, we feel personal accident insurance offers both the riders and us as organisers a level of protection for our sport, MTB Enduro. “Bespoke financial” are providing all PLI/event insurance for UKGE in 2015. We have also chosen them as our preferred supplier for your personal accident insurance as they have not only helped us with the Federation, but put together a package that we think will be the most cost-effective for you, the rider.
An annual package starts at £96 (£8/month) and not only covers you for racing your mountain bike Worldwide, but also covers you 24/7, 365 days a year, doing any activity and even at work! The Bespoke policy document personal accident cover is attached below to download. This is the minimum level of cover we require, but you are welcome to increase the level of cover if desired. Public Liability Insurance is part of the permissions process that UKGE have to adhere to before putting events on, therefore riders do not require individual liability insurance to race.
Bespoke Financial will provide us with the names of all riders who have cover with them, prior to any of our races. This enables race sign-on to be as fast and efficient as possible. For those racers with existing personal insurance cover with other companies, we will need proof that you are covered for racing and that your policy is in date. This will be needed for online race entry AND to be brought to sign-on. No proof, no race I’m afraid.
For the Under 18 category, insurance cover will not be a requirement of entry.
We asked both Helen Gaskell and James Green to be our “rider reps” because they have both attended every UKGE race since the start in 2011, and were experienced downhill racers before starting Enduro. We asked Helen to become our female representative before we started looking at our insurance options, but she has been helping us with negotiations with regard to the personal accident insurance.
If you want the continuation of the series and the further development of Enduro in the UK, then this is a necessity of the evolution.
Some have asked for more detail on the Life and Fracture Cover policy documents, you can download them below if you want to read them in full.
Fracture Cover PDF
Life Cover Policy PDF
Steve Parr – Race Director?
?
njee20Free MemberThis would have meant we would have required every rider taking part in a UKGE event to have had Gold membership and a BC Race Licence, at a cost of £109 per year. Gold membership also offers a level of personal accident insurance, as we are currently asking our racers to take out.
Except you don’t need a BC Gold licence, Silver is fine.
I’m still very “meh” on the whole thing. Don’t get it. Gorrick events entirely eschew BC regs, sanctioning, insurance etc, they’re immensely successful and you don’t need any additional cover.
monkeyfudgerFree MemberYep, although forcing gold on everyone is consistent with forcing PA insurance on everyone it’s not reqd, I can race on the road with silver which is far far moar dangerous than ENDURO. Still doesn’t actually explain his reasoning for forcing everyone to get insured or how in fact this reduces the chances of UKGE getting sued?
poahFree Memberstill doesn’t explain why they want you to take out personal insurance since that doesn’t affect them in the running of the event.
Hob-NobFree MemberI’d need to check, but i’m 99% sure i’ve never needed a Gold licence to race the BDS in the past, even as a proper BC sanctioned event.
Looks like i’ll be ‘buying’ a policy to enter, then cancelling it.
kimbersFull MemberI thought u needed gold to race DH , which is where BC and possibly UCI?? categorise enduro
looks like parr was just setting up the enduro federation with the same model
edit
BC requires silver £41 or gold £70(which comes with insurance) + race licence at £36
you can buy a single day license for road and track only
http://www.britishcycling.org.uk/membership/article/mem-st-Racing-Licence-Prices-0-Need-a-Racing-Licence–0cookeaaFull MemberMay have been covered (I struggle with long sentences), but has anyone approached CTC to find out about event/race insurance cover?
munrobikerFree Memberkimbers is Steve Parr and I claim my £5.
(No interest in UKGE, especially now. If I do an Enduro again it’ll be a reasonably price Scottish one that has reasonable rules and doesn’t expect me to take out unnecessary insurance and allows me to wear the helmet I deem to be most suitable)
BoardinBobFull Memberstill doesn’t explain why they want you to take out personal insurance since that doesn’t affect them in the running of the event
I’m guessing their logic is if a rider gets a payout from their own PA cover, he won’t come after UKGE with a claim.
kimbersFull Membermunrobiker – Member
kimbers is Steve Parr and I claim my £5.see above pic- Im far more handsome 😉
poahFree MemberBoardinBob – Member
I’m guessing their logic is if a rider gets a payout from their own PA cover, he won’t come after UKGE with a claim
that’s why the organisers have liability insurance
monkeyfudgerFree MemberNope, can’t see any requirement on BC website about needing a Gold membership to race DH and I’ve clicked through as far as I dare to enter Moelfre BDS too.
dragonFree MemberEnter the BDS
There are three simple steps to racing British Cyclings National Downhill MTB Series you must first purchase membership directly from British Cycling in either Silver or Gold, this allows you to purchase a ‘Full Race Licence’:No wonder BC pulled out of Enduro if the spoke person can’t get his rather basic but very important facts straight.
kimbersFull MemberNope, can’t see any requirement on BC website about needing a Gold membership to race DH and I’ve clicked through as far as I dare to enter Moelfre BDS too.
Enter the BDS
There are three simple steps to racing British Cyclings National Downhill MTB Series you must first purchase membership directly from British Cycling in either Silver or Gold, this allows you to purchase a ‘Full Race Licence’:http://www.britishcycling.org.uk/membership
When asked if you are a member of a club please pop down ‘British Downhill Series’ to help ensure we have a bigger voice within British Cycling.
The second step is to purchase a ‘Full Race’ licence directly from British Cycling. You can renew this from Wednesday December the 3rd 2014 either online as below or by phone 0161 274 2010.
The topic ‘If you thought mandatory full facers were a pain for UKGE…’ is closed to new replies.