the components on the Scale 50 seem better than on the Trek and I just saw it at £850. What about the Scale 30 2012 at £1300? Is the carbon fibre frame recommendable?
I think that, at least for now, I am planning to do longer rides and get to follow some routes until I get back to shape again. .
Actually, after a test ride yesterday (I spent an hour on the Scott Scale Medium and 30 mins on the Large) I feel some pain on my neck/upper back. Could it be because of the more aggressive geometry on the Scale or wrong sizing?
I am thinking that, if I finally go for any of the Scales, I could fit a slightly raised handlebar to see whether that helps with the handling and reducing a bit the virtual top tube length. Would that make sense?
My other option would be the Trek on 18.5 and, as you said, safe some money for further investment (though that carbon fibre frame is very tempting).