While at uni, I remember a module that contained a lecture about design and liability.
The example was about a screwdriver which had failed in use and injured the users. The defence claimed that the screwdriver was not being used as a screwdriver but instead as a pry bar on a tin of paint. The prosecution claimed that it was reasonable to expect a screwdriver to be used in such a way. The prosecution won.
Point being, if grease was that dangerous and damaging to carbon frames, not only would you have to warn users not to add any, but also to keep away any that might come from other sources. Imagine leaving a bike somewhere warm and a little grease deeper out of a headset or bottom bracket bearing? As above, you’ve have to be very prescriptive about chain lube as well.
This possibly comes from another industry where a different resin is used. Similar to how people thing EV batteries will only last 3 years because that’s all they get out of an iPhone.
Perhaps it comes from the early days of carbon bike failures where someone was looking to shift blame, like telling people they’d fitted a bottom bracket with a rock.
However, any design engineer who specs a resin that isn’t safe against grease isn’t doing a particularly good job when designing a bicycle