Home Forums News Come Join In The Singletrack Women’s Forum!

  • This topic has 158 replies, 77 voices, and was last updated 1 year ago by nbt.
Viewing 40 posts - 81 through 120 (of 159 total)
  • Come Join In The Singletrack Women’s Forum!
  • 1
    BigJohn
    Full Member

    Another one here who thinks this is a great idea.

    I’m an occasional poster here, I guess my posts are 50% genuine attempts to solve other posters’ bike or life problems and 50% smartarse comments. I don’t think (I hope) that any of them have been hurtful, but I’m a bloke so I wouldn’t know.
    I do know though that on group rides (like the old Sideways Cycles night rides) that females joining in for the first time can feel mighty intimidated.

    I hope it has a long and positive life. (And me and you too.)

    Stevet1
    Full Member

    If the target audience think it’s needed  then bring it on, I have been saddened by some of the comments on the main forum in the past so can see why it would be seen as a good thing. Quite often I’ve seen people assume posters are male and not even consider that they might not be which would get irritating after a while.

    However I’ve also learned a lot from the women posters as well that relate to my partner and daughter e.g. from  discussions on personal safety, and the article on period pants which I passed on. It would be a shame if these sorts of articles/discussions became solely the reserve of the women’s forum.

    3
    Bunnyhop
    Full Member

    In regard to thinking spaces should be all inclusive, I disagree, females really do need a separate ‘Loo’ and if you don’t understand that or the reasons why, then have a good think.

    Another interesting point mentioned above is fewer women post on forums through lack of time.
    My job isn’t computer based. I don’t sit in front of a screen and when work is finished, there isn’t always the time to catch up, at most I possibly read STW for 10 minutes and post once a day.
    Women still ‘seem’ to bear the brunt of child care, housework and care of an elderly relative, therefore time is limited.

    This new forum may or may not get off the ground, we can but hope.

    5
    scotroutes
    Full Member

    @Bunnyhop – you’ve outlined the reasons for my discomfort very well. If, as you say, there are a number of reasons for women not being frequent forum users, I’m afraid that the main forum will be lessened when those few interactions take place elsewhere. I’d much rather the main forum was a place everyone was comfortable. Shame it can’t be that.

    FunkyDunc
    Free Member

    <p>The other way round this would be to remove gender biased names, then no one would be able to tell who is male or female ?</p><p> </p><p>Just a random curve ball. Mrs FD works in a very make orientated environment as an orthopaedic surgeon. Many of the men have big egos and very outdated views. However she can directly challenge their stance. Many managers in the NHS are female, and she says their unconscious bias is in many ways worse and harder to over come.</p><p> </p>

    7
    Bunnyhop
    Full Member

    @scotroutes – I along with several other women will still be using the usual forums. I for one find this site the very best for all kinds of Information.

    The hope is that women will find the ‘new forum’, then join in with everyone.

    2
    scotroutes
    Full Member

    I hope so too.

    kerley
    Free Member

    The other way round this would be to remove gender biased names, then no one would be able to tell who is male or female ?

    My username is my surname, what gender am I, can you tell?

    14
    politecameraaction
    Free Member

    As a bloke I’d appreciate that discussion happening in front of me. How else am I supposed to learn stuff if it happens behind closed doors?

    It’s not being arranged for the convenience of “blokes”, and their education is not the responsibility of forum-using women. 🤷‍♂️

    nwgiles
    Full Member

    My username is my surname, what gender am I, can you tell?

    Obvious trap?

    Bunnyhop
    Full Member

    There’s bound to be one ‘naughty boy’ who sneaks in.

    Rubber_Buccaneer
    Full Member

    There’s bound to be one ‘naughty boy’ who sneaks in

    bedmaker
    Full Member

    There’s bound to be one ‘naughty boy’ who sneaks in.

    No sneaking required, the new forum is open to all. Any bloke who fancies getting in on the action just needs to be able to spell she/her 🙄

    1
    stevious
    Full Member

    Another vote of support from me.

    Rubber_Buccaneer
    Full Member

    Any bloke who fancies getting in on the action just needs to be able to spell she/her

    You sure? This is STW so I’m sure there will be a few cock ups (sic) in the implementation but

    beanieripper
    Free Member

    Honestly. People like Emily Pankhurst went down in history to break down gender barriers. Then some midlife crisis, mtb weekend warrior,mediocre web journo,  tries to redefine liberation by creating a “womens forum” jesus. nil point. wakey wakey

    1
    theotherjonv
    Free Member

    No sneaking required, the new forum is open to all. Any bloke who fancies getting in on the action just needs to be able to spell she/her

    Now go back and read the article

    2
    kerley
    Free Member

    As a bloke I’d appreciate that discussion happening in front of me. How else am I supposed to learn stuff if it happens behind closed doors?

    Talk to women, listen to women, live with women, work with women, read about women

    10
    joshvegas
    Free Member

    People like Emily Pankhurst went down in history to break down gender barriers. Then some midlife crisis, mtb weekend warrior,mediocre web journo, tries to redefine liberation by creating a “womens forum” jesus. nil point. wakey wakey

    Do you think the Pankhurst’s achieved what they did sitting in rooms surrounded by men?

    And if you are going to try and use history to back up your nonsense atleast get it right.

    Her name was Emmeline not Emily

    2
    molgrips
    Free Member

    nil point.

    Several million irony points though.

    1
    convert
    Full Member

    Could I just point out we’ve had a male equivalent forum of this for some time…..

    But the ‘members only’ forum doesn’t seem very popular.

    IGMC

    doomanic
    Full Member

    read about women

    Err… 🤣

    If this results in more women engaging in the main forum I’m all for it.

    1
    Bruce
    Full Member

    Please can you get the existing forum to work properly first. I have just tried to post a new topic and been told user ID missing. I am logged in and everything.

    Otherwise good luck with the new forum 🙂

    1
    ahsat
    Full Member

    I do find it very interesting that having flicked through 5 pages of the forum this morning there isn’t a single thread about the woman’s World Cup or Tour de France Femmes. Though this may seem minor, this is an illustration of how this forum might not seem as welcoming to woman from the outside, the content ‘isn’t for me’. Now I’ve been here a long time, and have got a huge amount from this forum – but I have a male mtb partner who got me here in the first place.

    1
    chakaping
    Full Member

    having seen the explosion in women on the trails, uplifts and just riding generally that so few have popped up on the forums, facebook groups etc.

    I have noticed an increase of women in MTB-related FB groups, and of course there are popular women-specific MTB groups, but I think this forum has become a bit of a grumpy, middle-aged backwater which isn’t particularly appealing to newbies.

    It’d be interesting to see the gender stats for Pinkbike’s readership and its active commenters. That’s surely the busiest MTB site by far, but has its own different kind of toxicity to this place (sometimes).

    And I do think this forum has become a bit more kind than it was a few years ago – if we ignore the aforementioned circle-jerks.

    3
    gowerboy
    Full Member

    I think that a woman’s forum is a good thing.  I hope it is popular and women enjoy and value it.  I am, of course, a bit curious as to what is discussed and how it goes; but I am happy that I’m not allowed to join and understand why. Please let us know how it is going from time to time.

    theotherjonv
    Free Member

    I do find it very interesting that having flicked through 5 pages of the forum this morning there isn’t a single thread about the woman’s World Cup or Tour de France Femmes.

    WWC is on P2 but I would agree it’s not exactly – buzzing.

    Woman’s World Cup

    nickc
    Full Member

    It’d be interesting to see the gender stats for Pinkbike’s readership and its active commenters.

    I’d bet money it’s just as gender biased as this one is. Seems to be a common feature of web based forums.

    ahsat
    Full Member

    Ah thanks TOJ – I do admit it was a relatively quick skim.

    chevychase
    Full Member

    @kerley

    Talk to women, listen to women, live with women, work with women, read about women

    Yes.  That’s exactly how it’s done.

    Unless you’re not able to interact with them on a forum, eh?

    The context of my whole post was about my distaste for single-sex spaces – for men or women.  If people want to pick individual sentences out to disagree with then that’s fine, but if you read the whole thing you can see what I’m getting at in a more balanced way 🙂

    1
    tomhoward
    Full Member

    I’d bet money it’s just as gender biased as this one is. Seems to be a common feature of web based forums.

    It’s an order of magnitude worse.

    2
    Stevet1
    Full Member

    It’s not being arranged for the convenience of “blokes”, and their education is not the responsibility of forum-using women

    Yep I thought that right after I posted an earlier message.

    Would be keen to see if this space could be used to discuss why the open forum isn’t more welcoming to women, and what changes could be made to enable it to be so.

    5
    tjagain
    Full Member

    When a person ( like me and most of the men on this forum) come from a place of privilege then equality looks like we are being hard done by unless you stop to think

    IMO I am sorry that this step needs to be taken but its not about me.  Its about the women on here and this is something it seems they see valuable.

    Thats the end of the debate for me.  Its not about me or the rest of us privileged men.

    2
    andybrad
    Full Member

    As a fat, short middle aged and bald bloke with zero understanding of what women want/need/feel and a real knack of upsetting people I feel as though this is the perfect opportunity to put my 2pennth in. 🙂

    Sounds like its a good thing.

    I really hope it brings more women into cycling in general. If it makes people feel happier and able to get involved even better. Good luck!

    3
    chevychase
    Full Member

    @ahsat:

    I do find it very interesting that having flicked through 5 pages of the forum this morning there isn’t a single thread about the woman’s World Cup or Tour de France Femmes

    Did you start one then?  It’s not encumbent on men to fawn over women’s elite sport, any more than it’s encumbent on women to fawn over men’s.   It’s just the nature of things and not necessarily indicative of an injustice of some sort.

    And I disagree with what you say above @tjagain – “privileged men”?  It’s a forum.  People are free to start threads should they so desire.  Fill thine boots, or dainty flip-flops, so to speak.

    Just because MTB has been traditionally majority-male that doesn’t make it a “privilege”.  Would you say that about women on a horse-riding forum (other than horse riding is associated with financial well-being – but that’s not necessarily privilege either)?

    That word gets bandied around too often tbh.

    Just to put this into a bit of perspective:

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/maleonly-clubs-face-ban-under-new-law-9234349.html

    That was absolutely the right thing to do.  You shouldn’t have clubs that are male-only.  You shouldn’t have clubs that have a room for only men either IMO. You can have a “women’s issues” forum or a “men’s issues” forum – but it should be open to all – anyone can walk in if they stay on-topic.

    Two wrongs don’t make a right.   And whilst I’m not going to get my knickers in a twist over however singletrack wants to cater to it’s female members I’m not going to delude myself that a female-entry only forum is anything other than sexist.  (And again, that’s fine – I’m just not going to couch it in terms of women being “oppressed” or men being “privileged” because because MTB is majority-male participative).

    We’d all love to see more female mountain bikers.  We all have wives / girlfriends / sisters / mothers etc.  But I’m not privileged because mountain biking is a bit of a sausage fest.  I’d argue exactly the opposite tbh – I’d say we’re impoverished by the relative paucity of female representation.   Most of the sports I do tend to be sausage-heavy, and that’s a real shame.

    I guess we disagree on the best methods to encourage people to become involved.

    Anyway, my last post on this.   It’s not a hill I want to die on 😉

    3
    tjagain
    Full Member

    NO – you are privileged simply by being male

    5
    kelvin
    Full Member

    Two wrongs don’t make a right.

    Do you say that about any attempts to right a wrong?

    I have no idea if a dedicated forum will work, but if the only harm in trying one is to erk some men who still don’t see why it might be needed… give it a damn good go. Good luck with it Singletrack peeps.

    6
    Bunnyhop
    Full Member

    Ah now, that’s interesting regarding ‘men’s groups’. We have in our small town 2 Women’s institute groups one of which I am a member, also a ‘men in sheds’ group. Most of the population of our small town seem to be happy with this set up.

    It seems pretty clear on this post that most of the women want this new forum and several men aren’t happy for us to have it, Cest la vie.

    2
    ahsat
    Full Member

    Did you start one then?  It’s not encumbent on men to fawn over women’s elite sport, any more than it’s encumbent on women to fawn over men’s.   It’s just the nature of things and not necessarily indicative of an injustice of some sort.

    I never said it was an injustice. I just used it as an example (one of several!) of why there may be low uptake of woman in the current forum, given it’s current focus’ is dominated by a certain demographic. Whereas the woman’s groups I’m part of have a lot of content on woman’s sport. It is also not my role to start one just because I’m one of the few woman present – I get my sport news updates from other places (I also don’t read the Men’s TdF threads) – it was just an example.

    1
    dissonance
    Full Member

    I have no idea if a dedicated forum will work, but if the only harm in trying one is to erk some men who still don’t see why it might be needed

    Agree. Seems worth a try especially.
    Would be interesting to see an update in a few months around how its working.

Viewing 40 posts - 81 through 120 (of 159 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.