i love the architecture threads for outing the conservatism of the stw’ers. if it’s not neo classicism then it’s obviously not right.
It’s got nowt to do with architectural ‘conservatism’. That building is singularly horrible. Truly nasty. It has no redeeming features whatsoever.
That it looks down over some of the poorest people on Earth is a separate crime.
India would like to present itself as thriving and prosperous, but the reality is, that much of the population exist in incredible poverty, and have little or no access to clean water, basic healthcare and adequate housing. I think it’s abhorent enough that here in Britain, some flaunt their wealth while others struggle to get by, but in India, that disparity is on a level probbly not seen anywhere else on Earth.
Personally, I find it incredible that one person could chose to ignore abject poveryty all around them, and build such a vulgar and ostentatious folly, but maybe I underestimate the greed and selfishness of some others…
Interesting point re stately homes;
as for the rights or wrongs of building the thing, i can’t say that it’s anymore innapropriate than the country house pictured above or any other of the grandiose stately homes in this country, built on the back of slavery, imperial dominance or feudal landlordship.
I agree.
Thing is, here in the West, the very wealthy tend to hide away in more modest dwellings these days, as it’s considered ‘vulgar’ to flaunt yer wealth in such a way. In India, it’s positively encouraged. The Hindu Caste system which prevails serves to divide people even more. And when people like Mukesh Ambani are allowed to exploit a cheap labour market with little regulation or obligations, then stuff like this will continue and we’ll see a lot more temples of Mamon…