The Stewards decision is really quite odd, isn’t it? You can see the Lewis slowed and would have been able to make to corner and to take the lead if Max had made ANY attempt to make the corner at all. He didn’t even start to brake until he was almost at the apex, he knew that he’d either spear into Lewis or force him off. Lewis backed out as he had room to do so and there was no collision.
Max would’ve caused a collision if Lewis didn’t back out a little. They ruled no fault.
In the mirror oposite of this at silverstone, lewis is on the inside (with more of his car alongside Max than Max had in Brazil) and max goes full tilt around the outside and doesn’t back out of it, but continues, not braking, but turning in, causing a collision.
Max did cause a collision because he chose not to back out of it a little and Lewis was found to be predominantly at fault.
Which rule is it?