Home Forums Chat Forum Drug Use for old folk?

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • Drug Use for old folk?
  • shoefiti
    Free Member

    Watched 'Shine a Light' Last night – the Rolling Stones film thing. At 66 Mick Jagger and Co look pretty damn sprightly, no sign of gammy hips and bad backs, things i get 30 years thier junior, and i've taken pretty good care of myself. There is no way on earth i could do what he does and i work out at the gym 1 1/2 hours a day and ride 150+ miles a week.

    What drugs do you reckon he does these days? My money's on HGH.

    Junkyard
    Free Member

    you could not be a self indulgent millionairre with your own fitness coach , nutrionist, private health care from the worlds best doctors , soft focus shots and PR to make you look good. What is up with you have you got self respect or something?

    ernie_lynch
    Free Member

    Well they haven't done much for Jagger's chamois leather face.

    Despite his protestations that they are laughter lines and not wrinkles, as George Melly famously pointed out, 'Surely nothing could be that funny'.

    MrNutt
    Free Member

    I think consuming the elderly as recreational drugs is ethically wrong. please don't imbibe your elders for cheap thrills!

    Keva
    Free Member

    For 15 years or more, Jagger has been a poster boy for healthy living. He is said to run 12 km a day, to kick-box, lift weights, cycle, and practise ballet and yoga.

    He hardly drinks alcohol, eats a low-fat diet with lots of whole grains, and travels with his own fitness trainer, dietitian, physiotherapist and chef. He aims for eight hours of sleep daily and wears earplugs on stage.

    It's said he runs up to 20 km during a two-hour concert and he has been quoted saying each show feels like playing five sets of tennis. He weighs about 143 pounds (65 kg) and has a 271/2-inch (70-cm) waist.

    Jagger's onstage antics are great for cardio-respiratory function — the singing tones his abdomen, and his dancing might as well be high impact aerobics, says sports physician Karim Khan of the University of B.C.'s family practice department and co-author of the book Clinical Sports Medicine.

    …and taking drugs doesn't necessarily lead to poor health, especially if you can get the best drugs money can afford and not some cut up brick dust from the street dealer. Having the best food money can buy and waking up in a four poster bed with five of the worlds most beautiful women has got to be better for you that waking up in a rubbish skip with piss stained pants and needle sticking out yer arm.

    Kev

    0303062650
    Free Member

    I havent been on STW for a while, and after reading the white-dreadlock post, and then this … jeez.. amusing indeed.

    Anyway, I only opened this because I thought it might be some ethical question relating to giving your own parents a significant quantity of diazepam or valium on a daily basis, which would be an excellent idea I think as they are probably the most bitter, benevolent $hits i've had the displeasure of being around.

    Well, failing that I'm sure Jagger is in a bit of a pickle but can afford to buy his way out of it!

    eldridge
    Free Member

    the most bitter, benevolent $hits

    I'm assuming that would be "malevolent"?

    Although if you expect to benefit from their wills after you've poisoned them with prescription medicines, I suppose they could be literally both bitter and benevolent?

    tangent
    Free Member

    studiously ingnoring the above rehtoric…my question is wtf is HGH?

    0303062650
    Free Member

    damned auto correct, I meant belligerent!

    oh, no intention of causing them any harm, just the prospect of spiking their tea with some chill-out tablets is most appealing!

    ernie_lynch
    Free Member

    LOL @ eldridge !

    tangent
    Free Member

    bike riding is mentioned in the above linkage…seems apros

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)

The topic ‘Drug Use for old folk?’ is closed to new replies.