No we don’t, because as has been discussed at length on other threads unless all the worlds governments agree to do something meaningful then it’s a waste of time
In terms of scale I get what you’re saying but it’s also convenient blame shifting and buck passing for people who don’t want to change.
Carrying on doing what we do suits them just fine. They also won’t change while we don’t.
Yes the govts are serving BP and Shell etc but if we all (for ex) stopped flying it would inconvenience us but uses our capitalist votes well and change would happen. If airline demand plummeted other enterprises and investment would fill the gaps in time. A practical fix/argument for a fast fix, no. But change happens slowly then quickly (like the climate will I suspect). It’s the type of change we can all make, mostly, and now.
Like flying to ride … the unfortunate truth is that we can all make more difference to our C02 impact by not flying anywhere. That means we lose out or do less nice things while watching others carry on regardless. But carrying on ‘because they do’ is inaction and being part of the problem. Pick a side, I reckon.
I say all that as someone struggling to do a job that doesn’t involve flying, I can’t change the world, I can only work on it and make my own changes.