Confusion - Bike ty...
 

Subscribe now and choose from over 30 free gifts worth up to £49 - Plus get £25 to spend in our shop

[Closed] Confusion - Bike type - Transition Content

50 Posts
16 Users
0 Reactions
159 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

So 'they' all think I should ride a Bandit, I counter with suggestion that would get me banned at the likelihood that riding one would bring on XC love that dare not say it's name and have me reaching for the lycra. I love my Covert, even though I can't answer questions like would it be better with Talas forks than the Float ones it currently has and would XO be better than X9 (I have no idea what that meant so just go 'probably')when folk meet you on it they assume you built it yourself and you know what you're talking about which of course I didn't and don't.

It's shiny, it's black and the seat post thing goes up and down and other than the handlebar thingies being a bit wide it's been a dream to own and I love it, so does my dog who goes wild every time I reach for it.

Now I've just had an email from she who knows everything cos her boyfriend runs an online magazine sending me [url= http://www.mikrotime.com/mtb/porc2011/bling122.html ]this link[/url] that some young guy has won a local downhill event on the flaming Bandit, so all my reasoning for the Covert goes out the window. (although I suspect he'd win such an event on a grocery delivery cycle)

So you lot seem to know what you're talking about, what is the difference between the two other than one came out last year and one this.


 
Posted : 22/11/2011 1:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Don't know who they are.
But I have a Covert and its mint as an all day bike that can then tackle a bit more gnar on the down bits.
The Bandit is similar with slightly less travel and a bit lighter.

Putting the two against each other, Id say the Bandit would be the better all rounder in most conditions.
However if you want a bike you want to use in most conditions and dont mind a bit of extra weight, but will then happily push your self on some downhill courses, the alps etc then the Covert is the better all-rounder.
Its all personal and what you want from the bike.

However, I lent mine to a 15 year old lad who came second in a downhill competiton in wharncliffe with a flat front tyre, so they are very capable going downhill, and Im always surprised how quick they'll get you up.


 
Posted : 22/11/2011 1:39 pm
Posts: 1423
Free Member
 

A bike is a bike, a good rider will still be a good rider on any bike.

The bandit and Covert are similar. Obviously the Covert is built to handle more abuse, will be heavier and better at going down than up.

Don't torture yourself over the decision, they're both great bikes. Think about the riding you do and if the bike is right.

I have a Covert. A bandit would probably be absolutely fine for most of the riding I do. But I like having a bike that's strong enough to handle anything I personally would throw at it. Would I do a 20 mile XC ride and expect to keep up with super light 4" bikes, hell no, but would it make it round, yes. I wouldn't do huge drops on it like you would on a dh bike, but it'll do most things.

I don't know why people agonise over decisions like these!


 
Posted : 22/11/2011 1:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Just needed convincing I'd made the right choice is all, those two posts pretty much sums up what I thought, but then I ride with such a bunch of bike whores, always looking for the next thing, she rides a bloody Zesty ffs and calls me whatever..
I'm not into long XC I can get up everything I need to and I did buy it with the occasional foray into the alps in mind. So ta for that, statistically the kid would have gone faster on the Covert if it's heavier, heavier things tend to go faster down I've noticed, my big mate always trashes me downhill on open hills with no technical turns or anything to slow him.

And the Talas v Float question what's the difference?


 
Posted : 22/11/2011 2:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I prefer float as there is less to go wrong and it appears smoother,
never been bothered about dropping the front for climbing etc


 
Posted : 22/11/2011 2:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

And the Talas v Float question what's the difference?

Talas forks have adjustable travel, so you could lower the front to stop it wandering on really steep climbs.

I'm a Bandit owner, but would also happily ride a Covert. As already said, there's a pretty big amount of overlap between the two bikes. If you're not fussed on the slight extra weight, which seems to be the case, then the extra travel of the Covert surely isn't a bad thing! 🙂


 
Posted : 22/11/2011 3:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Covert because mtb is actually about going downhill, the going up is just a means to end, anything else is losing sight of why we are here (on stw). Preffering xc over going downhill to do fast corners and jumping is like quitting sex so that you can spend more time perfecting your chat up techniques.


 
Posted : 22/11/2011 3:52 pm
Posts: 299
Free Member
 

Preffering xc over going downhill to do fast corners and jumping is like quitting sex so that you can spend more time perfecting your chat up techniques.

Quote of the week for me 🙂
(I mostly do xc)


 
Posted : 22/11/2011 4:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Preffering xc over going downhill to do fast corners and jumping is like quitting sex so that you can spend more time perfecting your chat up techniques.

Yep, about sums it up and is quote of the week for me also.

But.... that kid did still just win some downhill against Elite Factory riders on downhill specials, on a bloody Bandit, which correct me if I'm wrong is supposed to be more about XC. Edges seem to be becoming blurred.


 
Posted : 22/11/2011 5:02 pm
 jedi
Posts: 10238
Full Member
 

i prefer marzocchi or rhock shox forks.
🙂


 
Posted : 22/11/2011 5:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

But.... that kid did still just win some downhill against Elite Factory riders on downhill specials, on a bloody Bandit, which correct me if I'm wrong is supposed to be more about XC. Edges seem to be becoming blurred.

Maybe he was just way more awesome than the other riders - perhaps a new talent. Imagine what he could do on DH bike? (anyway the race was in kent, isn't it flat as a witches tit there?). Anecdotes don't make science. I get overtaken by kids on shoppers when DHing all the time, does that make shopping bikes better for DH or am I just abysmally crap..

PS thanks for the props on my quote..


 
Posted : 22/11/2011 6:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Covert because mtb is actually about going downhill

or not as the case may be


 
Posted : 22/11/2011 6:18 pm
 jedi
Posts: 10238
Full Member
 

love the quote toys19 🙂


 
Posted : 22/11/2011 6:20 pm
Posts: 10487
Free Member
 

This is the exact dilemma my mate is in.

This could turn out to be an interesting thread


 
Posted : 22/11/2011 6:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

yunki - Member
Covert because mtb is actually about going downhill
or not as the case may be

Yunki have you been watching me ride?


 
Posted : 22/11/2011 6:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

only discreetly... 😳


 
Posted : 22/11/2011 6:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

When you look at the rear triangle of that Bandit, they just look like thin bits of tube and you think which would you rather have under you if your belting down some horror story rock bit, even dyne here (it's how we speak)in Sunny Kent where we do actually get some gnarly bits (North Downs to Sea Level has got to be 800 ft +) not mountains but as big as your Chilterns or Surrey Molehills and like the man so succinctly put it, the going up is simply the means to a dynehill end and the pub.

[url= http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Downs ]North Dynes[/url]


 
Posted : 22/11/2011 6:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

[url=

then this comes along and puts it all in perspective, get an old clunker![/url]


 
Posted : 23/11/2011 12:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Derek, I was going to post that too, they are doing jumps that even with jet assist, airbags, caterpillar tracks and wall to wall carpeting, I just couldn't do..


 
Posted : 23/11/2011 12:14 pm
Posts: 1423
Free Member
 

I don't tihnk you need a travel adjust fork on the Covert. I have a 160mm fork without adjustment (Deville) and never feel like I need to lower it. My front end is pretty slammed with a 3mm spacer under stem, zero rise stem and 1" rise bars, just keep your weight central/push down and it's fine for climbing steeps.


 
Posted : 23/11/2011 12:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Same dilemma here? Bandit or Covert? Leaning towards covert I'm already crappy uphill and usually last up among mates so the weight of the covert does not bother me, i'm also first down and rip past my mates on the downs so covert should make me even faster.


 
Posted : 28/11/2011 8:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Friend just bought the Covert as the Bandit for all day riding was too heavy.


 
Posted : 28/11/2011 9:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Well I can get up pretty much anything I need to on mine, that Bandit is just the latest 'must have' fashionistas Surrey hill girls accessory, Covert is for regular down to earth folk, like moi.


 
Posted : 28/11/2011 9:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

derekrides do you think the covert would run ok on set of rockshox revs rlt ti forks 150mm as it might save a bit of weight over a set of fox 36's


 
Posted : 28/11/2011 9:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I wouldnt worry about weight saving on the fork, get the fox and start smashing the downhlls.


 
Posted : 28/11/2011 9:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Tested a very well spec'd Covert a few weeks back after a huge downpour, rode up a local hill in pretty wet and muddy conditions and loved it. Sat back and spun up the hill nice and steady like... Can't see how any lighter bike would have made a jot of difference in those conditions.

Got to the top, turned round and holy cr*p the Covert gets down well. Bloody flew down. Again, definitely no way a lighter, less travelled sibling would have been better - for me certainly.

Win win that one. I thought the covert rocked. Nearly bought one.


 
Posted : 28/11/2011 9:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

No good asking me technical stuff, i wouldn't have the first idea, this one has got floats I think they are and the one I had before had vans, I don't even know what the difference is, except the vans were heavier.

It's why I'm here, to read up on stuff like this so when folk ask me i sound like I know what I'm talking about, which sadly i don't. It's shiny, black, cool and rides well, that's enough for me.


 
Posted : 28/11/2011 9:18 pm
Posts: 2181
Free Member
 

I've been mincing with the Bandit / Covert dilema for a few months now. I demo'd a Covert a couple of weeks ago and loved it, loved the 36 front end (never ridden them before) and the angles. It looped out on a couple of steep tech climbs but had 10mm under the stem which was only 50mm long. I was still in the 'but is it just too much bike for UK riding'. You all have convinced me that the Covert is the way. I guess I was in the same dilema in '99 between the Heckler (then 100mm) and the Bullit and went for the Bullit without regret, though I was 12 years younger then my riding has got bigger if anything. Thanks guys, Covert it is. Hmm, now what colour? I do like the look of the new blue option. Is anyone running zero stack with a 70mm stem? My instinct tells me this would feel right.


 
Posted : 28/11/2011 9:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

good call, i do like Orange, but mines white, Ive got 5mm stack and 65mm stem. 745 bars and in line post.


 
Posted : 28/11/2011 9:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Buy a blue one and post a picture. Looks very nice on the web but would be good to see in real world setting. Spend some cash for STW 😉


 
Posted : 28/11/2011 9:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have the orange and love it. I went from a bullit to a covert, natural progression..
Crappy mobile pic

[IMG] [/IMG]


 
Posted : 28/11/2011 9:48 pm
Posts: 2181
Free Member
 

Aw, ok then, but only as its you guys. 😀


 
Posted : 28/11/2011 9:51 pm
Posts: 2181
Free Member
 

The orange does look sweet. You don't get the full anodise effect on their web site. My current Heckler is orange though, fancy a change.


 
Posted : 28/11/2011 9:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

that orange looks wicked could be changing my mind from black!


 
Posted : 28/11/2011 9:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

"Leaning towards covert I'm already crappy uphill"
Heres a logic I've not thought of before ..

"Bandit, which correct me if I'm wrong is supposed to be more about XC"
Its a 140/130mm FS. I thought it was a 'trail' bike of sorts. It will do XC (as a covert will), It will do 'all mountain' (likely not that far off a covert? just with a little less squidge?)

I don't think it helps that the build-ups transition seem to photograph (often?) have semi-slick tyres on. I'm guessing they're trying to differentiate it from the covert? If you compared it to bikes similar to it then you'd find burlier builds used to advertise it more likely?


 
Posted : 28/11/2011 9:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Toys19 that is a very nice ride, very. Like the white rims, but imagine how they would look on a blue frame? Only kidding, or not... Shit, maybe I should have bought a Covert!


 
Posted : 28/11/2011 9:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

just noticed orange not on this years colour


 
Posted : 28/11/2011 9:57 pm
 jedi
Posts: 10238
Full Member
 

who'd ride a transition anyway 🙂


 
Posted : 28/11/2011 9:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I like the orange.. The rest of the bits were just pretty much transplanted from my previous bike (bullit) .


 
Posted : 28/11/2011 9:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

what weight are you guys getting to I was hoping for around 30lb


 
Posted : 28/11/2011 10:12 pm
 ezzy
Posts: 47
Free Member
 

Derek

Perhaps ask the importer?


 
Posted : 28/11/2011 10:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well there is a lot of BS about weight, mines 34.5. (there is a thread on sdh where a guy has a tr250 with van 36;'s and he recons it weighs 32 lbs..)

Heavy stuff:
Coil forks,
wellgo dmr v12 copies,
halo spind dr wheels,
2ply maxxis 2.35 high roller and 1.2mm tubes (never get punctures)
reverb
fat seat
740 bars
blackspire stinger
big fat bash guard
truvativ holsfeller stem

Light stuff:
ummm ummm uhhhh ummm...

well maybe the elixir 5 brakes and 160 discs,
xo shifters
xo rear mech
fsa carbon cranks (which with the bb are actually heavier than xt so total crap imho, but saying that the cranks are lighter so rotating weight is down which helps it to pedal nice)


 
Posted : 28/11/2011 10:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

any more pics with specs please give me an idea of the way to go was heading the 2 x 10 route?


 
Posted : 28/11/2011 10:19 pm
 jedi
Posts: 10238
Full Member
 

my bottlerocket is 33lb. done ya toys19 😉


 
Posted : 28/11/2011 10:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Tony, your bottle rocket sucks, it hasnt got a reverb....

I'll bring my scales next time and we can have a weigh off.


 
Posted : 28/11/2011 10:28 pm
 jedi
Posts: 10238
Full Member
 

i want a reverb!!!!! its not fair...............sounds like a spoilt kid 🙂


 
Posted : 28/11/2011 10:33 pm
Posts: 3082
Full Member
 

2nd place was a hardtail!
DH race in Kent sounds like an oxymoron to me, think you should get a 29er for increased flatland speed with wagon wheels.

Covert sound fine for somewhere with contour lines on the map.


 
Posted : 28/11/2011 10:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

thats me Mourne Mountains 2800ft of elevation


 
Posted : 28/11/2011 10:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Covert is the Bike for The Mountains of Mourne!


 
Posted : 28/11/2011 11:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

toys19 you've made my mind up! looks like stealthy black, with some splashing of easton carbon haven bars and magura brakes, hope pro II's and the obligatory Reverb.


 
Posted : 28/11/2011 11:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

and the mountains of leeds


 
Posted : 28/11/2011 11:29 pm