Thanks for that insight into the industry – theres a lot of doom and gloom about (with the right wing press leaping on it as they love anything that suggests cycling is crap/doomed/etc).
UDH I’m really dubious about. I’m pretty sure that not all UDH is actually universal – so the ‘direct mount’ mechs that are on the horizon won’t work with all the bikes that have a UDH now.
More than that though it seems that what SRAM have designed a super cheap universal replaceable hanger that you’re unlikely to ever need to replace as rather than bending or breaking they just transfer all the load to your bike and risk breaking that instead.
On our trip to Spain in May and I wrote off an XT 12s mech on day 1 and another on day 2 and damaged the frame, but my UDH was just fine…
First time I knew I’m pretty sure I know exactly where I put the bike between two rocks. UDH rotates round and takes some carbon off the top of the seatstay, mech completely destroyed (both jockeys mashed, cage broken and bent, rear linkage on mech snapped in two) and into wheel bending a few spokes for good measure.
Replaced mech, replaced UDH (which looked completely straight anyway) and half way through the next day, I was being super careful – I *think* maybe a rock came up off the front wheel – and again UDH rotates into frame, and a brand new XT mech snaps at the upper link that attaches to the UDH.
I’d be really reluctant to buy another bike with UDH on – rather than bending a hanger and protecting the bike (and maybe even saving the mech) it seems you destroy bike and mech but dont’ have to replace a £15 hanger.
Seems I’m not the only one thinking this (external link)