Some hideous responses on this thread, especially about feeding him bacon / pork / alcohol.
Surely a mark of civilisation is how we treat those who have done wrong (and he certainly has done wrong) but ‘an eye for an eye’ is not the way forward.
Feeding him pork or bacon is not an eye for an eye. His belief is to murder others in cold blood so you are just “rehabilitating” his belief by feeding him good pork/bacon. He must be released from his own mind before he make peace with himself. Pork is the way to go. If you do not break his belief what rehabilitation have you done? Nothing. He belief is intact yet he sees that he has done nothing but right …
When you rehabilitate someone what do you do? You “re-educate” them by changing their belief or behaviour whatever … is that not? In this case shocking him to the realisation, if it works, does that not mean you help him to see things differently?
An eye for an eye would mean slow death with maximum pain.
The death penalty he is going to get is a compassion for him. They should know that compassion has been showed to him with a quick death.
Just like the slaughter of animal where you stunt them first before you bleed them to death all in the name of compassion or the quick cut to the throat with a prayer.
🙄