Home Forums Chat Forum Bicycle riders worse for the environment than car drivers?

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • Bicycle riders worse for the environment than car drivers?
  • colande
    Free Member

    http://news.mongabay.com/2006/0722-bikes.html

    ha he has a point, 😀
    but by that rational we killing ourselves would be better for the environment,

    Stoner
    Free Member

    an excellent example of the theory of unintended consequences 🙂

    jimbobrighton
    Free Member

    what a unit!

    nickc
    Full Member

    Bike riders live longer and there are more of them because they are more healthy, ergo they have more of an environmental impact over their lifetimes.

    Interesting…

    sootyandjim
    Free Member

    I suppose improved medical care could be accused of being ‘non-green’ too then?

    WorldClassAccident
    Free Member

    Similar to a discussion I had over a few beers:

    Which politician has had the greatest positive environmental impact?

    WorldClassAccident
    Free Member

    I voted for George Bush

    His wars have killed more Americans who are the greatest polluting individuals

    He f*cked up Iraq’s oil production

    His general world policies have screwed the price of oil making people find better ways to get energy

    gusamc
    Free Member

    Given the number of people on this form who will dance for Maggie she must be in with a shout, mass exercise for the working classes – nobody else has managed it ;+)

    RudeBoy
    Free Member

    Ah, but those wars have seen the use of loads of depleted Uranium, phosphorous and all sorts of other nasty chemicals, WCA; not to mention the incredibly damaging effects of weapons production and testing..

    Any news on the job situation?

    Kuco
    Full Member

    I thought they Halted the A10’s using depleted Uranium shells.

    sootyandjim
    Free Member

    Nope. DU ammunition is still being produced by many countries although only the UK and US have admitted using weapons containing DU. The problem is that DU isn’t covered under any specific treaty.

    It is the possible poisonous secondary effects of DU that is the main concern but the acts covering the use of poisons in war specifically exclude ‘nuclear material’ because they are covered under their own treaties. Unfortunately the nuclear treaties aren’t concerned with the poisonous nature of nuclear materials as generally (in the case of Plutonium/Uranium) its the explosive nature and mass-destruction caused that is the primary concern.

    BTW, the A10 is only one of the many weapon systems that uses DU ammunition.

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)

The topic ‘Bicycle riders worse for the environment than car drivers?’ is closed to new replies.