Home › Forums › Chat Forum › 2019 General Election
- This topic has 6,282 replies, 176 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by kelvin.
-
2019 General Election
-
scotroutesFull Member
RS – what you think doesn’t matter if you can’t drag enough of the electorate along with you. You can either campaign, persuade, cajole folk over a long enough period that you eventually change their minds or you compromise to get more of them on board and at least get some of your policies implemented.
RustySpannerFull MemberYou lucky sods never fell for the Tory lies. 🙂
Ah well, good luck in Europe. You deserve it.Any chance of moving the border 100 miles south?
outofbreathFree Memberdemocratic socialist manifesto
AS yet nobody has managed democratic socialism. The talented/hardworkers leave so you have to get autocratic to stop them.
Fortunately we have two experiments on two different countries so we know exactly how socialism ends up:
West and East Germany started from *exactly* the same starting point. Which of those would you rather have been poor in?
North and South Korea started from *exactly* the same starting point. Which of those would you rather be poor in?
I’m all for conducting further experiments in Socialism, just not in the UK. If it works elsewhere we can adopt it.
binnersFull MemberRusty – I don’t have that much of a problem with the last labour manifesto. I voted for it. Apart from the magic money trees needed to pay for it all. But the Tory’s are now doing that too
I do have a problem with the fact that I can’t see even the most rudimentary level of competence from Jeremy or those in his clique. They’re imbeciles. I wouldn’t trust them to run a bath, never mind the economy
And I have a problem with him as his cabal as they look like they’d quickly and happily follow the well-trodden socialist mould of becoming very very authoritarian, very very quickly
But most of all I have a problem with him and his record as a Brexiteer and his red unicorns
outofbreathFree MemberDon’t be so cynical. It’s going great in Venezuela
Funny you should mention Venezuela because when I saw this exchange:
Surely there has to come a time for listening to the actual electorate instead of preaching to them?
If that were true we’d be out of the EU now so be careful what you wish for.
I couldn’t help but reflect on this:
President Maduro acknowledged PSUV defeat, but attributed the opposition’s victory to an intensification of an economic war. Despite this, Maduro said “I will stop by hook or by crook the opposition coming to power, whatever the costs, in any way”.[173] In the following months, Maduro fulfilled his promise of preventing the democratically and constitutionally elected National Assembly from legislating.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venezuela#Suspension_of_constitutional_rights
When people start telling us we’re too stupid/badly informed to govern ourselves I get a bit jumpy. I accept we *are* stupid and badly informed, but as Thatcher said “each generation has to stand up for democracy.” and part of standing up for democracy is being slow to accept that we’re better off with well informed leaders making decisions for us. ‘They’ may be better informed than us, ‘they’ may make faster better decisions than us but sooner or later totalitarianism always ends up in a worse place than democracy.
outofbreathFree MemberApart from the magic money trees needed to pay for it all. But the Tory’s are now doing that too
This. We’re living in the era of the pork barrel and our kids will be picking up our tab.
RustySpannerFull MemberRusty – I don’t have that much of a problem with the last labour manifesto. I voted for it.
Yet you’ve ignored and marginalised it.
And I have a problem with him as his cabal as they look like they’d quickly and happily follow the well-trodden socialist mould of becoming very very authoritarian, very very quickly
Oh I agree. He’s a knob.
slowoldmanFull MemberAS yet nobody has managed democratic socialism
Whereas social democracy…
rsl1Free MemberHow the **** is Corbyn still the main talking point when Boris ******* Johnson is the alternative!?
dazhFull MemberHow the **** is Corbyn still the main talking point when Boris ******* Johnson is the alternative!?
Beards apparently.
kelvinFull MemberJohnson has widened the appeal for his party by offering Hard as Hell Brexit to those barking for it, and increased borrowing and public spending to people who just want Brexit ‘out of the way’ and austerity ended. Both those groups think he is a liar… but he’s offering what they want… wrapped up in winning talk and the Union Flag, so will take a punt on him.
Corbyn needs to widen the appeal for his party as well. And his campaign should have started when Johnson’s did. Or, if it did, it needed to be carried out more effectively.
In the (2020) election, Labour will do better, and the Conservatives worse, than they are polling now… but I don’t see that ending up with a Labour majority… like many people I’m just hoping a Conservative majority can be avoided via tactical voting and regional swings to anyone but Johnson’s party.
piemonsterFree MemberHow the **** is Corbyn still the main talking point when Boris ******* Johnson is the alternative!?
It’s quite simple really. He’s a lying cheating ****bag that’ll sell you out to book his place in history whatever the cost (for you, not him)
What’s left to talk about?
outofbreathFree MemberAS yet nobody has managed democratic socialism
Whereas social democracy…
…means the same as democratic socialism:
noun: a socialist system of government achieved by democratic means.
…and nobody has managed it. Historically once you take all the means of production, distribution, and exchange into state ownership, you have to kill democracy off because everyone wants to go back to capitalism and people start to escape to go to capitalist countries. So then you end free speech to stop people complaining and you put up a wall to stop people leaving, and then you end up shooting people to stop them escaping.
Maybe this isn’t inevitable in which case another experiment in Socialism might be worth a go, but let’s not make the UK that experiment. Let’s see how it goes elsewhere and do it once we’ve seen it work.
roneFull MemberHow anyone can keep supporting unfettered neolibralism is beyond me. By design it cannot work – it concentrates wealth and doesn’t reward some of the most difficult jobs in society. It breeds massive inequality and poor public services.
Our country is flattened by growing personal debt (propped up by low interest rates) and poor quality opportunities. How does asset stripping and turning everything into a market solve this? It doesn’t.
The country needs mass investment into everything that shapes our lives. If the money is spent into the economy (certainly infrastructure) and the workforce takes up the slack there is no issue with deficits. The Tories hugely missed the mark and created a last breath economy, and it will get worse and worse until we redistribute and invest.
A sovereign country can’t run out of cash either. Read Stephanie Kelton now.
Socialism only fails when the marketeers don’t want to make it work. Or conversely when they need to socialise the losses.
There may be other versions of hybrid capitalism that might work but certainly not the neolib variant we have now.
It’s doomed. Don’t vote for it.
In fact I would say Brexit is pretty much the culmination of failed neolibralism. Even if it’s the wrong target – people have had enough it’s just a shame that they swing more to the right in this process.
That’s the bitter pill.
kelvinFull MemberA sovereign country can’t run out of cash either.
I’ve lost my German 50 Million Mark note… it used to be my favourite bookmark.
roneFull MemberSo we have just had a remainer elected for our strongly leave – labour (ex John Mann) constituency.
We will be Tory at the next election.
Bet ya.
roneFull MemberI’ve lost my German 50 Million Mark note… it used to be my favourite bookmark
??
Don’t give me the inflation twaddle.
How much inflation did the q/e of the banks cause?
Zip.
Inflation is the product of underlying problems in the economy. I.e massive instability or corruption a la Zimbabwe.
Inflation is controlled by taxation. Money can be removed the economy.
Washington establishment freaks out as Modern Monetary Theory gains currency
dazhFull MemberHistorically once you take all the means of production, distribution, and exchange into state ownership, you have to kill democracy off because everyone wants to go back to capitalism and people start to escape to go to capitalist countries.
I think you’re confusing Harold Wilson with Joseph Stalin. This country has always been a capitalist country, even in the days when the state owned a whole raft of industries which labour aren’t proposing to re-nationalise now. It always will be a capitalist country, and labour have never said that they’re going to change that. If you seriously think the labour party will turn this country into soviet russia or east germany then you need to do some reading of history. Or you’re just being ridiculously stupid.
slowoldmanFull MemberWhereas social democracy…
…means the same as democratic socialism:
noun: a socialist system of government achieved by democratic means.Wikipedia says “Not to be confused with democratic socialism”.
“Social democracy is a political, social and economic philosophy that supports economic and social interventions to promote social justice within the framework of a liberal democratic polity and a capitalist oriented mixed economy”. Which, given that most economies are “capitalist oriented” includes most socialist parties.
binnersFull MemberAny of you Corbynites still delusional enough to think that Labour is in any position to fight a general election should read Andrew Rawnsley in todays Observer
Turkeys won’t vote for Christmas when the polls are telling them they’ll be stuffed
With the cabals obsession with ‘restoring democracy to the party’ (read: getting rid of everyone who doesn’t agree with Jeremy) they are actually in a position, with their trigger ballots and mandatory re-selections, where they have key marginal constituencies where they don’t actually have candidates in place yet. With a General Election imminent. Unbelievable. Well… it should be. In any serious political party
Meanwhile Dom and Dommer started their election campaign 3 months ago and are dictating the narrative
This country is in desperate need of an effective opposition, that’s a realistic party of government. Instead we’ve got a bunch of pious, sanctimonious, preachy, self-regarding, self-serving incompetents who seem to be completely detached from reality.
Maybe, after the 5 years of Boris that they’re helping to deliver, and god only knows what that will take us, a grateful nation will be ready to vote for the socialist revolution next time, eh?
Maybe that’s the ‘plan’. I’m sure everyone about to be bent over while the Tory party go in dry will eventually be thankful for the left wing utopia it’s certain to deliver… eventually
What a bunch of ****ing clowns! To call them sixth formers would be unfair on your average sixth former. They’d probably cobble together a more credible election campaign than Corbyn and his gang of imbeciles
kelvinFull MemberMeanwhile Dom and Dommer started their election campaign 3 months ago and are dictating the narrative
Well, that sounds like a pretty good reason to deny them a 2019 General Election.
DrJFull MemberHow anyone can keep supporting unfettered neolibralism is beyond me. By design it cannot work – it concentrates wealth and doesn’t reward some of the most difficult jobs in society. It breeds massive inequality and poor public services.
It’s working fine in Somalia.
dazhFull MemberTJ was right.
Looks like the Lib Dem and Tory pact of 2010 is being re-established. They are back together, selling out the People’s Vote campaign and the cross party campaign to prevent a no deal. The Lib Dems will stop at nothing to get their ministerial cars back.
— John McDonnell MP (@johnmcdonnellMP) October 28, 2019
kimbersFull MemberAbsolute bobbins dazh
An election asap is pretty much the last chance to stop brexit
Because otherwise Johnson will put his deal back & with some amendments his Labour allies (flint, etc) will see it passed
olddogFull MemberWhen do we talk about Orange Unicorns. Lib Ds all weekend and again this morning pushing hard that they will win a majority and revoke A50. I assume they are not delusional, just cynical.
Combined with never doing an alliance with Corbyn even on a 2ns ref – but some guff about reaching out to like my need MPs across Parly
A plan to maximise LD votes and MPs with stopping Brexit as banner headline but actually opposing the only likely way to do it – Labour led Govt, prob with support from SNP, LDs and 2nd ref
dazhFull MemberA plan to maximise LD votes and MPs with stopping Brexit as banner headline but actually opposing the only likely way to do it – Labour led Govt
Some of us have said all along that the libdems didn’t care about stopping brexit and were only interested in increasing the number of their MPs so they could get back into govt with the tories. That’s exactly how this is panning out. Remainers need to wake up, the libdems are not on their side.
his Labour allies (flint, etc)
Yes, the Tony Blair fan club, enabling brexit along with their Lib Dem friends. It will be the irony of ironies if brexit goes through as a result of the votes of MPs who claim to be anti-brexit. It’s going to be the political sell-out to beat all others.
zippykonaFull MemberOne thing that I hadn’t thought of is that Bercow retires this week. He has been a key player. I’m sure that in the interests of fairness Corbyn will want a staunch leaver as speaker.
dissonanceFull MemberI’m sure that in the interests of fairness Corbyn will want a staunch leaver as speaker.
You might need to elaborate on this? What conspiracy theory is at play in your head?
binnersFull MemberAren’t there about 400 applicants for the speaker’s position?
I reckon Mark Francois will get it
dazhFull MemberCan any of the remainer Corbyn haters on here explain to me how Swinson’s sellout stops Johnson ramming through his hard brexit? If Binners et al are right that labour cannot win, then the alternative is Johnson and a hard brexit with no chance of a 2nd Refendum. Does that look like Swinson is pursuing a remain agenda? Looks like the opposite to me so that she can gain a few more MPs.
dissonanceFull MemberAren’t there about 400 applicants for the speaker’s position?
Quite a few.
The Speaker really does seem like a bit of a crap idea nowadays. It means four constituencies arent properly represented.kelvinFull MemberI don’t hate Corbyn, and I don’t hate Swinson either, I just don’t rate either of them very highly, but I’ll give it a go @dazh…
There will be an election at some point… Johnson is trying to get his WA legislation through parliament first… two opposition parties are saying we should have the election before the legislation (if we’re not having a referendum before the legislation).
I’m not even sure if this move is genuinely designed to get us an earlier election, or rather to put pressure on Johnson by separating his demand for the legislation to be passed from his calls for a December election. Perhaps also to put pressure on Tory rebels looking at losing their seats, and some in Labour still pushing against a referendum, to back the moves that SNP & LibDems keep making as regards referendum before election amendments.
Labour are wise to avoid a 2019 election, but they need to do so in a way that isn’t fuelling Johnson’s “chicken” narrative… and it could well be that what at first looks a crazy move form the SNP & LibDems could be one way of fighting back against that claim, while also trying to block Johnson getting his Brexit this year.
We’ll end up with a 2020 election. Johnson will have the most seats after that. SNP and LibDems are after more seats at the upcoming election, and hoping Johnson doesn’t get a majority.
binnersFull MemberIsn’t it just a case of simple arithmatic?
The Lib Dems want an election because they will increase their number of MP’s
The SNP want an election because they will increase their number of MP’s
The Tory’s want an election because they think it will deliver them a majority
The Labour party most definitely don’t want an election as they’ll be losing lots of seats to all the above.
As for potential coalitions… any statements about who you will and won’t work with will go out of the window half a millisecond after a hung parliament with no overall majority
oldnpastitFull MemberIf we *don’t* have an election before the latest extension expires, what is going to be different?
We’ll just have a re-run of what’s just happened sometime in January, with exactly the same outcome.
dazhFull MemberThe Lib Dems want an election because they will increase their number of MP’s
Exactly my point. So the lib dems are abandoning any pretence at stopping brexit in favour of gaining more MPs and hopefully being part of a future coalition with the tories. Glad we cleared that up.
outofbreathFree MemberI think you’re confusing Harold Wilson with Joseph Stalin. This country has always been a capitalist country, even in the days when the state owned a whole raft of industries which labour aren’t proposing to re-nationalise now. It always will be a capitalist country, and labour have never said that they’re going to change that. If you seriously think the labour party will turn this country into soviet russia or east germany then you need to do some reading of history. Or you’re just being ridiculously stupid.
I was *responding* to the term ‘democratic socialism’. I didn’t raise the term ‘democratic socialism’ in this thread or in relation to Labour. I don’t *think* the person who originally brought up was using it specifically in relation to Labour either. (…and I think I’m going to hit the report button on the ad hom..)
Remainers need to wake up, the libdems are not on their side.
They’re the only party with a remain policy. That’s as close to being on the remainers side as you can get!
The topic ‘2019 General Election’ is closed to new replies.