Home Forums Chat Forum 2015-16 rugby, world cup year

  • This topic has 7,395 replies, 232 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by WillH.
Viewing 40 posts - 5,841 through 5,880 (of 7,396 total)
  • 2015-16 rugby, world cup year
  • wilko1999
    Free Member

    Christopher!

    wrecker
    Free Member

    The Race Relations Act is 40 years old this year. It ought to be pretty clear which side of the line “gypsy” is on by now.

    IDGAF what it says.

    ourmaninthenorth
    Full Member

    IDGAF what it says.

    I bet Joe Marler does….

    Pigface
    Free Member

    IDGAF what it says

    Always good to have discussions with a mindset like this 😆

    CaptainFlashheart
    Free Member

    IDGAF what it says.

    Luckily for the rest of society, your opinion is entirely irrelevant. Wrong, too.

    ton
    Full Member

    calling someone gypsy boy is not a ethnic slur, but is seen as controversial.

    if Marler had called him pikey boy, he would be in trouble.

    ourmaninthenorth
    Full Member

    calling someone gypsy boy is not a ethnic slur, but is seen as controversial.

    Both controversial and – given the context – evidently also an ethnic slur (both in fact and also in law for the last 40 years).

    I’m worried this is a difficult concept, not least because this was broadcast live on national TV.

    anagallis_arvensis
    Full Member

    Had AWJones said hey black boy to Itoje I’d think he would deserve a rest.

    wrecker
    Free Member

    https://twitter.com/Tyson_Fury?ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^author

    You cannot compare actual racism with pretend racism. It’s a travesty that this type of thing, whilst bad form, has been lumped into the racism category.

    captainsasquatch
    Free Member

    England have Nigel Owens next week, so hopefully not a referee affected outcome

    That’s a bit of a low blow, isn’t it?

    Teetosugars
    Free Member

    *Pointles post about Joe Marler as its been pointed out already he’s been cited* 😳

    anagallis_arvensis
    Full Member

    You cannot compare actual racism with pretend racism.

    You’ll have to expand on this for me. Dont get your point.

    ourmaninthenorth
    Full Member

    You cannot compare actual racism with pretend racism. It’s a travesty that this type of thing, whilst bad form, has been lumped into the racism category.

    You seem to have all the answers. Can you help me out with this one?

    namastebuzz
    Free Member

    Ah well seems like nearly every copper I’ve ever met is breaking The Race Relations Act with the use of “pikey” or “gypo”then.

    IdleJon
    Free Member

    From OMITN’s ink:

    Leighton Price, who is a relative of Wales rugby international and Scarlets prop Samson Lee, said he was proud of the player’s start against New Zealand and had gone for drinks to celebrate.

    The 31-year-old and his wife Rebbecca, aged 34, have called for an end to discrimination of gypsies.

    She said: “Leighton only goes out once or twice a year. He went to one pub and he was on the way in and the bouncers stopped him — they said, ‘you can’t come in, you’re a gypsy’.

    How would the doorstaff have known his background?

    deadlydarcy
    Free Member

    I would imagine that being a gypsy, he’s a well known troublemaker and thief.

    Pigface
    Free Member

    A night out in Llanelli is eye opening, Lee’s family have a certain “reputation” according to a friend who lives there.

    dantsw13
    Full Member

    Capt. Sasquatch – you’ve lost me?!?!

    My point is the ref in the ire/Fra game let France illegally smash Ireland, and it affected the outcome, whereas I believe Owens is too good a ref to let that happen, and the best team will win.

    dantsw13
    Full Member

    I’d like to hear a full transcript of what Marler said.

    I’m assuming that Lee is from a Gypsy family?

    If Marler had said “cmon Welsh boy” would that have been racist.

    Is the term “gypsy” considered racist? Honest question. I fully agree that being in the public eye, and their words broadcast to millions, the right thing has to be seen to be done. Maybe it’s time for. The ref link to be edited before broadcasting?

    IdleJon
    Free Member

    Maybe it’s time for. The ref link to be edited before broadcasting?

    Or maybe thicko props should think before speaking?

    dantsw13
    Full Member

    The fact he IS a thick prop probably stops that!!

    IdleJon
    Free Member

    Duct tape before the game?

    DanW
    Free Member

    I’m assuming that Lee is from a Gypsy family?

    Didn’t you see his Bebo page? 🙂

    Or maybe thicko props should think before speaking?

    I always thought Marler did a good job of pretending to be thick but as I said before, it looks like he’s been double bluffing all along.

    Blaming being knocked out of the RWC for a late tackle is one of my favs

    ourmaninthenorth
    Full Member

    I’m assuming that Lee is from a Gypsy family?

    Famously so – google ferrets and 61 cousins.

    If Marler had said “cmon Welsh boy” would that have been racist.

    No. Not in law, and being Welsh is not considered to be part of a separate ethnic or racial group.

    Is the term “gypsy” considered racist? Honest question. I fully agree that being in the public eye, and their words broadcast to millions, the right thing has to be seen to be done. Maybe it’s time for. The ref link to be edited before broadcasting?

    Yes. It’s been outloawed for 40 years (Race Relations Act 1976).

    Interesting point on ref link – I think one of the things about rugby is that swearing on the pitch is expressly forbidden (and reffed against), so we shouldn’t run the obvious risks that football and cricket suffer. And ordinarily we don’t.

    Consequently this is a pretty rare thing and ought to be adjudicated against the normal high standards of (verbal) conduct.

    dantsw13
    Full Member

    So, having followed this all day, I’ve come to the conclusion that:

    Poking the opposition in the chest and calling him a “Welsh/English/Scottish/Irish Prick” is fine.
    Calling them a “black/white/Asian/gay/gypsy prick” isn’t.

    I imagine the former happens all the time, and I doubt Marler is clever enough to differentiate. I think he will soon find out though.

    At least we won’t have 2 pages on loose heads hinging next week! 😀

    deadlydarcy
    Free Member

    Poking the opposition in the chest and calling him a “Welsh/English/Scottish/Irish Prick” is fine.

    I think a ref might have something to say on the matter if he felt that it was being verbally abusive. The advent of the ref-mic is giving the IRB something over which to scratch its head. We want ever closer access to the game (and the IRB want us to have it…heaven forbid what we’d hear if there was a ref-mic in football 😀 ) meaning new standards have to be set and maintained by players and referees rather than taking the silly “it was ever thus” attitude. If that means players playing at the top level (rather than say, no-name hookers lamenting the days of brutal amateurism), have to moderate their language then so be it.

    (Btw, “Irish” would have to be treated differently I’m afraid. 🙂 )

    mindmap3
    Free Member

    I thought Marler had grown up a bit; he used to get caught ip a lot in lots of niggle and off the ball stuff. He clearly hasn’t.

    I wonder if Alex Waller will be called up as a replacement…it doesn’t look good for him either way with a citing and an investigation for verbal abuse. I’m surprised no one has been called up yet with only a few days until France. Jones has said that he’s acting as if he’s free to play but I’ll be really surprised if he is.

    teamhurtmore
    Free Member

    More selective quoting DD, deary me but your correct “it was ever thus”…

    ….note that the aforementioned hooker was the victim of the verbal abuse based on nationality not the perpetrator.

    teamhurtmore – Member
    No it’s not – and he will get 4 weeks, that clear.

    Verbal abuse of a player based on religion, race, colour, national or ethnic origin, sexual orientation or otherwise carries a minimum sanction of a four-week suspension.

    teamhurtmore
    Free Member

    depends on the sensitivity of the recipient

    We’re in 2016 right? And you’re still saying this?

    Yes for the basic reason that this is how the law stands – if someone is offended by the type of comment under questions then its pretty straight forward – it doesn’t matter on the motives of the perpetrator – hence my comments on what is (or at least should be) clear. So as above, it depends on the sensitivity of the recipient on the rugby field and in the workplace.

    grahamt1980
    Full Member

    I realise this is the other code, but seriously ouch.
    sfw bbc link

    anagallis_arvensis
    Full Member

    So are we having THM in a discussion of what is racial abuse. Reminds of that song by Alanis Whatserhername

    teamhurtmore
    Free Member

    No because we agree on what is and what isn’t -as do the RUs and common law – it really is simple

    jambalaya
    Free Member

    They tried microphones in cricket and had to stop as the language and abuse was so bad. I don’t condone the use of the term “gypsy” but this is daft, players are always trying to wind each other up.

    deadlydarcy
    Free Member

    No because we agree on what is and what isn’t -as do the RUs and common law – it really is simple

    So despite the protestations of duckman (and others) at you constantly referring to Scots as “sweaties” and your repeatedly defence of it not being racist (and subsequent attempts at sneaking in various references to “sweat”, “sweating” etc), because duckie felt that it was, then it was.

    We’re clear on that then.

    players are always trying to wind each other up.

    Indeed. Apparently, it was ever thus.

    anagallis_arvensis
    Full Member

    don’t condone the use of the term “gypsy” but this is daft, players are always trying to wind each other up.

    Yeah they should stick the old fashioned ways like elbowing a prone player and rubbing his head in the dirt whilst cheering a try..oh hang on!

    jambalaya
    Free Member

    Just remeber folks, England won the (meaningless post rwc) 6N with a match to spare. Hence maximum effort required to generate a controversy to distract from fact other teams did not.

    Only interest left is whether a decent French team / effort appears out of nowhere next weekend. Not impossible.

    For other totally meaningless and irrelevant statisics I worked out today this is the first year in 24 I have not seen live at least one 6N game home or away. Only the third year in 30 also.

    deadlydarcy
    Free Member

    Never mind, it’s only 144 weeks of having to think back through so only just under three years for lots of rugby fans.

    tallie
    Free Member

    I didn’t think there was much in either the Marler forearm or the Francis nose tweak – I’ve certainly given and received much worse in my playing days…

    The Marler name calling was footballerish, has no place in rugby and is therefore by far the worst crime imo.

    Anyway on a lighter note we’ve all done this haven’t we?

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/article/35292422/rugby-player-dives-over-wrong-line-celebrates-and-is-pummelled-by-opposition

    teamhurtmore
    Free Member

    Well DD you see in law (see above) the distinction between nation and race is clear, so no, any colloquial reference to a nation cannot be racist by defintion. Indeed in the sporting context there is precedent with rulings in Aus and NZ re the use of poms for the English. Of course, people use the race card to exaggerate a point (or make one when it doesn’t exist). But with regard our mutual friend, he was offended and got the result he wanted – so the point is proven again. It depends on the person who is aggrieved – simple.

    Anyway back to the rugby, Jambas very true. It must be difficult to swallow having a poor English side win the championship with a match to spare. And for 12 and 15 to play well too!!! Oh and 2 wasn’t bad either!!M

    DanW
    Free Member

    It must be difficult to swallow having a poor English side win the championship with a match to spare.

    Not really. England have been the best team of the tournament. I don’t think anyone here will disagree with that. True, it feels a bit strange that this could be the route to their first Grand Slam for ages as the expectations were very low from the fans but of all the competition they are the ones most deserving if any. What is hard to swallow is how more sh1t our own teams have been and how dire most of the games have been 😳

Viewing 40 posts - 5,841 through 5,880 (of 7,396 total)

The topic ‘2015-16 rugby, world cup year’ is closed to new replies.