Home › Forums › Chat Forum › 2.8% for NHS and teachers
- This topic has 209 replies, 60 voices, and was last updated 3 weeks ago by ceepers.
-
2.8% for NHS and teachers
-
nickcFull Member
More doctors, more to share the load, less stress.
Payments to GP practices are based on list sizes, I’d like to recruit another doctor to share the load, I can’t afford another one, in fact I’ve already agreed with one to cut their sessions (stress, work life balance etc etc)
2KramerFree MemberI agree that pay isn’t everything. But if people feel underpaid in all industries they are more likely to leave.
There are loads of other things that need sorting too – workload, responsibility, cracking down on complaints, workload dumping by hospitals and other community services, micromanagement etc…
3thepodgeFree MemberI don’t know any doctor that feels underpaid, just ones that feel over worked. You cant cancel one out with the other… Though I feel like we’re basically arguing the same point.
3orangemadFull Member2.8%, should be 28% plus. We need to recruit and retain in the public sector. The NHS and teachers are massively under valued at all levels. You could also reduce tax for the public sector employees as a perk as well.
Why the public sector is so underfunded, under resourced and under valued is beyond me. If the public sector is happy, it makes the private sector stronger and round we go.
4EdukatorFree MemberOn GP wages: people who don’t think GPs should be able to afford to ski obviously aren’t bothered about not having a GP.
On teacher wages: those who got a PGCE around the time I did realised they could get better pay and conditions doing something else so apart from a few teaching in countries where pay and conditions are more attractive I don’t know/know of any teacher of my generation who is still in the profession. Even the more recently qualified don’t stay long. Women leave the profession in droves when they have kids because the wages don’t cover child care so they don’t return to teaching – part time work or work that allows WFH is ultimately more lucractive.
In both cases under paying people with the intelligence and commitment to be either a GP or a teacher is a poor strategy and false economy. They’ll end up doing something else and/or going somewhere else.
1KramerFree MemberOn GP wages: people who don’t think GPs should be able to afford to ski obviously aren’t bothered about not having a GP.
Brilliant. And true.
madhouseFull MemberTwo separate arguments here: is 2.8% a reasonable pay increase? and is the base salary enough?
Is 2.8% a reasonable increase? probably. I’m looking at 2-3% in the private sector, inflation’s coming down too, so as a deal it’s pretty vanilla.
Is the base salary enough? no, probably not. It’s the NHS that fixes people up and sends them back out to work, so they can drive the economy, so it stands to reason that the better NHS we have then the better economy we have. But it all comes at a price as the books need balancing and promises have been made to not put up taxes when in reality that’s exactly what needs to happen – but no-one’s going to like that!
Only other thing that’s going to increase the size of Government spending is either economic growth or borrowing, and we definitely don’t need more borrowing. We should pay some off but then that’ll reduce the amount of money to spend on NHS wages.
Balancing the books is not easy and every decision to spend more is met with another one that needs to be made to spend less, so if we spend more on the NHS what do we spend less on? Defence? Roads? Police? I don’t have the answers.
1ratherbeintobagoFull MemberI don’t know any doctor that feels underpaid, just ones that feel over worked
That’s really not the tone of our BMA-led trust WhatsApp group. There may be embarrassment about admitting that to non-doctors, though (and in any case I think what people are driving at is similar pay for not doing a load of effectively mandatory overtime)
3matt_outandaboutFree MemberWhy the public sector is so underfunded, under resourced and under valued is beyond me.
You do know which government we had for the last 14 years…
6tjagainFull MemberDoctors particularly seniors are well paid compared to the rest of the public sector. Whilst I do not disagree they are underpaid overall they have done better than care assistants, cleaners, junior nurses etc over the last 14 years.
I’d like to see some thought given to biasing rises to the lowest paid for now. Sorry docs – you can wait your turn 🙂
1KramerFree Member@ratherbeintobago indeed. Just look at the rather ridiculous reaction on here to the fact that I’ve been on a skiing holiday.
There’s also a taboo amongst doctors about admitting that money is a motivation for practicing medicine which starts at our med school interviews.
KramerFree Memberthey have done better than care assistants, cleaners, junior nurses etc over the last 14 years.
Sorry, that’s just not true. “Rich” doctors have been an easier political target than our less well paid colleagues, who I believe have had relative protection from pay freezes etc.
tjagainFull MemberI don’t know any doctor that feels underpaid, just ones that feel over worked
That’s really not the tone of our BMA-led trust WhatsApp group. There may be embarrassment about admitting that to non-doctors, though (and in any case I think what people are driving at is similar pay for not doing a load of effectively mandatory overtime)
My feeling is if conditions of practice / workloads were better sorted that would go a long way towards improving retention. Probably cost more than a pay rise but lead to a better service. And yes – some hospital doctors hours and pay structure are stupid.
1FunkyDuncFree MemberRe doctors pay, giving them bigger payrises is just enabling them to go part time / retire earlier thus reducing capacity overall making the existing issues worse – it won’t make them ‘happy’ they aren’t on the breadline so its not a material impact in that sense.
Those retiring or going part time are doing so because it’s costing them to go to work. My wife’s colleague is dropping from 14PA’s to 10 because it’s costing her to go to work.
I know many that disagree with that. From where hospital doctor pay used to be it has been massively eroded. Other professions offer much better pay. Newly qualified are all going abroad where they can earn far more .
You don’t become a doctor to become rich these days
Mrs FD has a consultant post out at the minute . Very prestigious job , great part of the world , but not one single uk trained applicant.
2anagallis_arvensisFull MemberI am Dr and I have never been on a skiing holiday
1ratherbeintobagoFull Member@Kramer The other thing is that Ireland has just negotiated a new consultant contract, the starting salary for which is 3x what it is in the UK. Even if you accept that a lot of Ireland is 10% more expensive to live in, this is causing a few people to pause for thought.
And it’s also causing massive problems in NI.
@tjagain The issue is that doctors are relatively well paid, but that doesn’t mean the pay erosion isn’t worse.tjagainFull MemberThere is not a “one size fits all” for doctors pay and retention. GPs, consultants and FY1s al need different things. We also need to train more of them.
I merely suggest that given the budgetary restrictions lets bias pay rises towards the lowest paid in public service. Those who are ending up with top up benefits or even using food banks
2nickcFull Memberthey have done better than care assistants, cleaners, junior nurses etc over the last 14 years.
Some of those will be on min wages, and those have had a percentage increase more than GP/doctors have.
2KramerFree MemberFor those stating that improving quality of life alone for GPs will solve the problem, it won’t.
25 years ago, we had a pretty good quality of life as GPs, less complaints, shorter hours, much better hospital support, and better hours.
We could not get doctors to apply to training schemes because of the low pay.
If got fixed when New Labour gave GPs a massive pay rise.
If you want decent quality GPs with decent access (and you probably should, because it would fix many of the problems with the NHS) you need to pay us well enough and improve our conditions.
Successive governments keep on trying to get a GP service on the cheap, and that’s why we’re so chronically short.
2SpeederFull MemberIf I’d been doing the same job for the last 20 years, I’d be the equivalent of at least £20k worse off. Add inflation over that period to the £32k I initially took for the engineering team role and that should be the equivalent of £70k+ now – just to keep up with the rise in the price of everything. £70k is still senior+ money and we’re all getting screwed.
5KramerFree MemberI am Dr and I have never been on a skiing holiday
You should try it. It’s a great way to meet <checks notes> other doctors. 😉
1ratherbeintobagoFull MemberGPs are different, and I dare say @Kramer knows better than I, but my general feeling was that GP is the one part of the NHS that was truly world-class, and what they need is the resource to make things better (which will include pay) rather than a reorganisation to make things more like secondary care.
For hospital doctors, it’s relatively straightforward – we need pay restoration, and what I do now is not worth less in real terms than what I did in 2008.
@Kramer Believe me I have lots of other things I’d like to spend my money on than skiing. More bikes for one thing.3IdleJonFree Memberthey have done better than care assistants, cleaners, junior nurses etc over the last 14 years.
Some of those will be on min wages, and those have had a percentage increase more than GP/doctors have.And will still be unable to pay their rents and utility bills while some of their colleagues will be skiing.
nickcFull Memberyou need to pay us well enough and improve our conditions.
The biggest headaches I have now (in no particular order) are probably patient expectations, regulatory framework (the onerous level of compliance), ICB interference, the continual shifting of workload to GP, performance monitoring – pointless league tables, data gathering for 3rd party bodies, hoop jumping for funding.
3ratherbeintobagoFull MemberAnd will still be unable to pay their rents and utility bills while some of their colleagues will be skiing.
And the option here is paying highly trained, highly skilled professionals what they’re worth, which means they can go skiing, or not doing so, which means they’ll be skiing in NZ or Canada having emigrated, which means you can’t access a GP.
Obviously all NHS staff deserve pay restoration.
nickcFull MemberAnd will still be unable to pay their rents and utility bills
Oh sure, but they’ve still seen a larger increase. Last year alone was nearly 10%
IdleJonFree MemberAnd the option here is paying highly trained, highly skilled professionals what they’re worth, which means they can go skiing, or not doing so, which means they’ll be skiing in NZ or Canada having emigrated, which means you can’t access a GP.
Obviously all NHS staff deserve pay restoration.
Well said. I just found that skiing comment rather tone deaf but I may be being a little sensitive after a year where my outgoings have gone up massively while my pay hasn’t. But, I’m not a teacher or a medic so have no more comment to make, other than maybe some sarcasm. 😀
3towpathmanFull Member@kramer just to be clear I do think doctors are underpaid, I say that as my partner is a doctor, so I see the level of responsibility required for the job.
However, if you want to drive the discussion and get people to agree that doctors should be paid more, it’s probably best to leave out the anecdotes about your skiing holidays, as this will alienate many people. Just because you don’t get paid what you deserve, doesn’t mean you aren’t in a position of relative privilege, and you should be mindful of that
FYI I get paid more than my partner, so I’m not speaking from a position of envy here
2scotroutesFull MemberRe doctors pay, giving them bigger payrises is just enabling them to go part time / retire earlier thus reducing capacity overall making the existing issues worse
Exactly what we are experiencing locally. I mean, I get it. How are you going to fit in all your holidays if you’re working full time?
3ratherbeintobagoFull MemberRe doctors pay, giving them bigger payrises is just enabling them to go part time / retire earlier thus reducing capacity overall making the existing issues worse
I’d argue the contrary – letting people do fewer hours makes them less likely to go early, and paying more makes it easier to recruit/retain.
EdukatorFree MemberThe communist dream, eh, IdleJon, everybody should be poor. Fact is that medical studies are long, expensive and hard work, and it takes more than just vocation (which we all hope is the main reason our doctors doctor) to get to be any kind of doctor. There’s an opportunity cost too, if you’re talented enought to get through medical school you could probably get into other even higher paid professions.
It’s slightly easier to become a teacher and again having a vocation is a big part of it for most. However, in my case the desire to go skiing, own an energy efficeint house, bring a kid up without economic constraints, live somewhere properly nice… trumped the teaching vocation. So I have low pay, shitty conditions and a dick of a headmaster to thank for my subsequent success in life.
5KramerFree MemberPeople getting snippy on a mountain biking forum about skiing holidays need to give their heads a wobble.
3towpathmanFull MemberI assume that’s aimed at me. Fair enough. I don’t know you and couldn’t care less about you and how much you do or don’t get paid. However I’m not the one who is trying to persuade others that I should be given a pay rise. So you can consider the advice, or ignore and carry on as you are – your choice
2DT78Free MemberIt wasn’t either or, the point was one of the challenges is capacity doing anything that reduces capacity is not going to be helpful
I gave the example of funding medical qualification. I mean we desperately need doctors. Why do we put in a huge financial barrier to those who are unable or unwilling to saddle themselves with huge debt? I think all bar one doctor I know is from a family of doctors who were able to fund them through med school.
People from poorer backgrounds ‘moving up’ are less likely to be thinking a guaranteed job for life paying double+ naitonal average with a great pension is rubbish. I can also assure you, unless you are very lucky, you can’t just jump into another profession and earn £100k+ no matter how bright you are, you’ll need to retrain and get experience.
As for moving abroad, there are pros and cons, I doubt there are enough posts for everyone whose threatening they can just pop over to NZ or canada
3KramerFree MemberI’d argue the contrary – letting people do fewer hours makes them less likely to go early, and paying more makes it easier to recruit/retain.
Yes, certainly in GP land, the people I know, myself included, who work part time, do so to maintain their mental health.
If I didn’t have the option to work part time, I’m pretty sure I’d have left the profession or emigrated.
I also studied for a long time, am told by my colleagues that I’m good at my job, and work hard. I’m also aware that I’m luck to be able to do so, but I won’t be ashamed of getting paid more than some, and spending it on things that I enjoy and are good for my mental health.
1EdukatorFree MemberOh sure, but they’ve still seen a larger increase. Last year alone was nearly 10%
Given “official” Uk inflation over the last four years i strikes me that nurses have still lost out. Take into account that inflation has been highest on the non discretionray spending such as housing, transport and energy and people on low incomes have seriously lost out to inflation.
One NHS sector that is definitley overpaid is the host of non-productive managers and admistrators that the modern world has created. 😉
2tjagainFull Memberthe same argument for retention can be made all across the public sector
ratherbeintobagoFull MemberI doubt there are enough posts for everyone whose threatening they can just pop over to NZ or canada
That really depends, from my team of 12 we have lost two consultants to Canada in the last 18 months.
KramerFree MemberWe’re losing a partner to Qatar in two weeks. He’s only been a partner for less than two years.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.