Me and my brother in law cleared a couple of nice paths a couple of years ago and very subtly enhanced them so they would flow.
We then left them be to return to nature so they would hopefully go unnoticed by folks.
Started down one tonight to find 'Stickman' had been busy. Pretty weird as this had never happened before. As it turns out he had done us a favour!
Further down some idiot has dug sodding great holes in the line and created mantraps to add big berms..
Cheers dude 
That will be the Forestry Commission. Thats what happens here in the FoD.
What the FC dig holes in trails and put sticks down to obstruct your way? Strange.
mattsccm » That will be the Forestry Commission. Thats what happens here in the FoD.
Mugboo » created mantraps to add big berms
The forestry commission make berms?
Your trails? Do you own the land?
Sorry. I am told its progress!
No TJ, just a turn of phrase.
No ownership. But I am extremely careful to keep things subtle and natural. Both these paths are also very steep in places and barely used by the local dogwalkers.
Now someone has decided to turn them into their own version of Whistlers A line! Wouldn't mind so much but if you want material for a feature then why dig it out of the trail itself..
Was probably a 12 year old with a sideways haircut and one of those floppy beanies, or 'knut hats', as I like to call them
Similar thing happened round my way recently. Ruined the flow and left hardly any room to squeeze past their dubious looking addition.
You'll not squeeze round this. It's just missing punji sticks.
if you want material for a feature then why dig it out of the trail itself..
Probably because when their mums dropped them off, they couldn't fit a barrow in the car as well as their expensive DH bikes.
TandemJeremy - MemberYour trails? Do you own the land?
Intellectual property innit.
So please explain to me the moral difference between what you did in creating these trails and what the others did in altering them?
TJ, please shut up with your whining. Cheeky trials have an etiquette which isn’t written about in Wikipedia or one of your 'Dummies guide to Law' books.
he's just having moan TJ dont take it so seriously
TJ - much as i'm usually the first to advocate not building on land you don't have permission for, there is a big difference between pruning back the odd tree or removing debris lying on the surface and digging ruddy great pits in the ground. The latter is substantially altering the environment and is likely to upset the land owner and inconvience other users.
Moral difference (rather than legal) is whether you have a negative impact on other users or the land owner.
Stop being so petulant Teej, 'tis the season to be merry!
Mugboo basically answered the question here:
Wouldn't mind so much but if you want material for a feature then why dig it out of the trail itself..
He wouldn't mind modifications, but
dug sodding great holes in the line and created mantrapsisn't quite the same is it?
Sorry TJ no offence intended but I would rather poke myself in the eye then get into a long and laborious discussion about the in's & out's of the morals of local trails with your good yourself 
Mugboo, it happens, fix em up proper or leave them be. I had a very well constructed trail checked by FC and they left it alone, a good while later ripped apart by FC as there had been other building on it deemed to be a poorer standard, so FC chopped the lot.
Intellectual property innit.
Love it
Yeah, sod off TJ you killjoy 
what scruff said.
going back to the OP, its usually kids, see plenty of the same round this way they just dont see the bigger picture and as a result can make some pretty dangerous mistakes. If they get really out of hand then it also attracts the wrong kind of attention and the original subtle trails are rendered useless.
meanwhile new super sneaky under the radar trails are being formed.
So please explain to me the moral difference between what you did in creating these trails and what the others did in altering them?
Your need to argue with people for no apparent reason astounds me sometimes.
neal - mugboo has been building trails on land he does not own and without the landowners permission - but moans when someone else does the same because he doesn't like the result.
It hypocrisy and humbug
What I read, was that he cleared a few branches and debris from an already existing path that was rarely used.
And someone else came along and dug dirty big holes in it.
(but my "looking for an argument" filter is switched off I suppose so maybe you read something different?)
The gulf between the reality of their foolishness and the delusional self-proclaimed wisdom of certain frequent posters on here absolutely beggars belief!
Mugaboo was there first wasn't he? Its like grafitti-ing over someone elses grafitti, just plain rude! Youf of today aint got no respect, innit!
We understood what you meant first time TJ. In fact we knew what you meant before you wrote it as you always bang on and on about the same thing over and over over....
At this thread
Hilarious arguments indeed.
To the OP, yup it must be frustrating, but I wouldn't be surprised stuff like this happens, only way to avoid it would be to get some proper permission and decent surfacing down which couldn't be turned into uber pr0 doublez in an afternoon.
only way to avoid it would be to get some proper permission and decent surfacing down which couldn't be turned into uber pr0 doublez in an afternoon.
Spoilsport. +1 for Guerilla Trailbuilding
It's dog eat dog out there man.
just fill the hole in with their berm if you're that bothered about it. repeat until they get bored and go somewhere else. it does grate a bit when you mark a trail out and try to keep it low key, then some clot comes along and starts messing with it, but if it isn't your land then you can't get too uptight about it. either take direct action to 'un-modify' it, just ride it as it is, or move on.
When I find time I'll go and fill in the holes so no one gets hurt
Can't imagine a world where you only ride the rare, boring, overused bridleways that just end up as deep, deep bogfests or 3m wide sandstone paths.
Surely exploring is in our nature
And the landowner in the case allows riding.
Would this be the little wood above a village beginning with 'H'?
J - nad luck fella, just put it back to a decent condition. Half the time it's kids / folks who don't know any better who've tried to build something, found it doesn't work and then never come back.
And TJ please pull your head out of your arse 
You must log in to post.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
