Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 340 total)
  • Explain the "Thatcher" thing to me
  • emsz
    Free Member

    Right, I’m watching the news and they’re talking about Thatcher and the new film with Meryl Streep. I don’t get why she’s so loved by some and so hated by others. and it is hate, not dislike or couldn’t care, y’know?

    why? My first real awareness of politics was Blair, but even now she’s still referenced (Cameron has been described as her heir) I feel I should understand more about her. You lot have opinions about everything, so educate me.

    Bregante
    Full Member

    Right, on that note, I’m off to bed!

    brakes
    Free Member

    you’d be better off asking google or wikipedia than asking on here, it will only descend into titting for tat

    Steelfreak
    Free Member

    “You don’t know, man, ’cause you weren’t there…”

    Elfinsafety
    Free Member

    Emsz, this is a Monday Morning type thread. It’s late and people are tired.

    Her ‘legacy’ was to instil in people the idea that personal wealth is more important than a healthy society.

    More than that, you’ll have to wait until tomorrow…

    X

    bruneep
    Full Member

    <shudders>

    TheSanityAssassin
    Full Member

    To be honest, you had to be there.

    And if you were, you really wish you weren’t.

    My dancing shoes are polished and ready….

    LsD
    Free Member

    Because she was a spiteful auld hoor.

    druidh
    Free Member

    emsz – Member
    My first real awareness of politics was Blair, but even now she’s still referenced (Cameron has been described as her heir)

    5thElefant
    Free Member

    She saved us from the unions and financial collapse, grew the middle class and broke down class barriers.

    That really upset some people. 🙂

    TandemJeremy
    Free Member

    As a deliberate policy she pushed millions onto the dole and wasted the north sea oil money paying for them to do nothing.

    We still are paying the price to day as the underclass she deliberately created continue to exist.

    it was done to drive down the price of labour and to reduce the power of the unions. Unemployment from a million to nearer five million. Industry was devastated and the rich got richer while the poor got poorer

    A massive crime against the people of our country. Of course some will defend her- the people who did well out of it – the richer amongst us.

    donsimon
    Free Member

    and it is hate, not dislike or couldn’t care, y’know?

    Don’t doubt that it is hate, she popularized and encouraged selfishness to levels that split families, destroyed towns and sold out industries. Not for the good of the population, but for the good of herself and a few well positioned cronies.

    druidh
    Free Member

    She was so hated that she got re-elected – twice and her policies so reviled that “New” labour adopted them whole-heartedly in order to get elected.

    Does anyone remember all that Thatcher legislation that Tony Blair over-turned when New Labour got into power? All the industries they re-nationalised? The increased control they re-exerted over the financial services? Nope – neither do I.

    thomthumb
    Free Member

    if you want to know why she is so vilified you could do worse than to watch this

    emsz
    Free Member

    See what I mean? It’s always ‘Her’ and ‘She did’. Not the conservatives or her government, but always just her. 😕

    Why is that?

    Edit: Hopeless I know, but I really don’t want a fight, but I want to try to understand the history of it.

    bruneep
    Full Member
    molgrips
    Free Member

    Okay. How long have you got? 🙂

    After the war, we had our first few Labour govts who nationalised lots of industries and put up taxes and public spending. This carried on but by the 70s things were a little difficult. With so many industries owned nationally the unions were able to demand high pay and lots of benefits for their staff, otherwise they went on strike and, being national industries, the government lost lots of money.

    So Thatcher was elected to sort all this out by privatising loads of companies and shutting down the industries she didn’t like (broadly speaking) like coal.

    Now.. the social aspect of this is interesting. When taxes were high and public spending was high, this is a more left-wing situation – it’s spreading the wealth out more evenly amongst the people through taxation. A lot of people think this is good. Thatcher favoured a situation where people make lots of money for themselves, and this gets spread about buy people buying stuff from other people. Consequently, the 80s were all about individual money-making and greed.

    Or to put it another way, Thatcher was very right wing (in British terms at least). Those people who like to make lots of money for themselves loved her because she gave them the opportunity to do so. Those people who wanted everyone to be nice to each other hated her.

    There were a few incidents that were worse than that though. The coal miners didn’t like what was happening so they went on strike. This of course meant no electricity could be generated, which is pretty bad. So Thatcher closed down coal mines and bought the coal from elsewhere which successfully stopped the coal miners from holding the country to ransom. However a small side-effect of this was the removal of the livelihood of hundreds of thousands of people, which destroyed communities across large areas of the country.

    That’s why she’s hated.

    I’m sure I’ve got much of this all wrong but that’s how I understand it. I was only 4 when she was elected 🙂

    Elfinsafety
    Free Member

    She saved us from the unions and financial collapse, grew the middle class and broke down class barriers.

    Which is why we now have an Underclass, rapidly evaporating workers’ rights, increased hostility between different social groups and an even greater disparity of wealth amongst the population….

    donsimon
    Free Member

    Why is that?

    She had an overall majority in govt and bullied all conservative members to support her, like a dictator would.

    molgrips
    Free Member

    See what I mean? It’s always ‘Her’ and ‘She did’.

    Cos most of it was her idea. Same as New Labour was Blair and Brown’s idea.

    CharlieMungus
    Free Member

    Since Thatcher people really began t vote for their own interests rather than those of the nation

    meehaja
    Free Member

    Lots of people round here and in south yorkshire haven’t had a job since she was in her “prime”. She’s a “national heroine” for destroying British industry, British rail, British coal and British steel. Greed is good, and if you’re not down with that you don’t matter. Also she probably fathered David cameron.

    buzz-lightyear
    Free Member

    They’re casting their problem on society. And, you know, there is no such thing as society. There are individual men and women, and there are families

    Prime minister Margaret Thatcher, talking to Women’s Own magazine, October 31 1987

    Elfinsafety
    Free Member

    Also she probably fathered David cameron.

    😆

    Close the thread now. That line’s not going to be topped.

    😆

    Purest qualitage…

    TooTall
    Free Member

    druidh – you do know that the traditional rabids of this forum will largely ignore your pertinent comments of argue right around them.

    TJ – reducing the cost of labour – by removing the economic crutches that underpinned badly-performing improperly nationalised industry? Interesting thought. That would then put us as competitive on the world manufacturing stage?

    Steelfreak
    Free Member

    Throughout the 1960s and 1970s, British society was (slowly) becoming fairer, with better opportunities and living standards for those at the lower end of the social scale. Thatcher blew all that out of the water and created the economic feudalism that we live with today. Thatcher also helped to created an ‘underclass’ by smashing traditional heavy industry (especially up North) and accepting the resultant high unemployment as a ‘price worth paying’ rather than trying to create alternative jobs for those communities she shattered. I must stop now as I feel a rant coming on…

    AdamW
    Free Member

    See what I mean? It’s always ‘Her’ and ‘She did’. Not the conservatives or her government, but always just her.

    Why is that?

    Hi Emsz

    I think you’ll find similar if you think about Tony Blair too. They are very polarising people. Perhaps another emsz in twenty years will ask the same question of him.

    emsz
    Free Member

    Thanks Molly, that’s the sort of thing I was after

    Edit Hi Adam :mrgreen:

    TandemJeremy
    Free Member

    Because she drove it emsz. The political philosophy was hers.

    She diverted money from the poorer folk to the richer – and never once actually had a majority of the vote despite massive parliamentary majorities – she got the parliamentary majorities because of a divided opposition.

    An incredibly divisive figure because of her deliberately divisive policies. To her mass unemployment and the massive social ills it caused was a price worth paying in her own words – and we are still paying now.

    TooTall
    Free Member

    Which is why we now have an Underclass, rapidly evaporating workers’ rights, increased hostility between different social groups and an even greater disparity of wealth amongst the population.

    All of which existed in 1978 and at most other times before and since. It was not some sort of utopia before 1979. Rose tinted 20/20 rear view vision does not suit you.

    Elfinsafety
    Free Member

    That would then put us as competitive on the world manufacturing stage?

    We’ve bin steadily sliding down the table in terms of World’s biggest producers…

    My dancing shoes are polished and ready….

    I’ve bin waiting and practicing for so long mine are practically worn out now. I’ll have to get a new pair. 😐

    Can’t be long now.

    Tick tock, tick tock….

    (Please, Santa; please. I’ve bin good all year)

    Bregante
    Full Member

    Also she probably fathered David cameron.

    He has a point

    And now I really am off to bed. Night all

    donsimon
    Free Member

    she got the parliamentary majorities because of a divided opposition.

    And changing constituency boundaries.

    AdamW
    Free Member

    All of which existed in 1978 and at most other times before and since. It was not some sort of utopia before 1979. Rose tinted 20/20 rear view vision does not suit you.

    The same could be said of you too, TooTall, regarding Mrs T’s time…

    EDIT: oops, pasted wrong bit! sorry!

    molgrips
    Free Member

    She’s a “national heroine” for destroying British industry, British rail, British coal and British steel.

    For a bit of balance (and I am a long way from being Tory) the nationalised British industries were in a pretty poor state at the time. It was about that time when places like Japan started to get better than us at making things, and global markets were opening up so we could buy coal from central Europe. There were lots of factors – it’s expensive ot mine coal in Wales because people need to be paid more, but the coal is very high quality which is great for steam trains and ships. Of course, there were very few of these around by the 70s so demand for the good expensive stuff had fallen hugely.

    druidh
    Free Member

    TooTall – Member
    druidh – you do know that the traditional rabids of this forum will largely ignore your pertinent comments of argue right around them.

    Looks like the former.

    wors
    Full Member

    i’m 34, i hate her and i’m not sure why. Maybe it was my Dad throwing things at the tv when she was on. Dunno.

    CharlieMungus
    Free Member

    She was so hated that she got re-elected – twice and her policies so reviled that “New” labour adopted them whole-heartedly in order to get elected.

    Does anyone remember all that Thatcher legislation that Tony Blair over-turned when New Labour got into power? All the industries they re-nationalised? The increased control they re-exerted over the financial services? Nope – neither do I.

    No, because she made everyone greedy and sefl-seeking

    molgrips
    Free Member

    In fairness to Blair, his idea for New Labour was to be somewhere in between the Tories and old Labour. Which is reasonable – people had the opportunity to vote the old ways back in for a generation, and they didn’t, because (on average) we didn’t want to go back. That’s democracy in action, and it’s what fit society at the time.

    Old Labour was committed to nationalising industries. That would really not have fit well with the modern world we found ourselves in.

    donsimon
    Free Member

    It would appear that we have an overriding hatred for the woman here. 😕
    Dividing the population? I think she’s brought us closer together… My enemy’s enemy is my friend.
    Perhaps we should be celebrating her….

    Nurse! NURSE!!! Where’s my medication??? NUUUUUUUUUUUUUUURSE!!!!

Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 340 total)

The topic ‘Explain the "Thatcher" thing to me’ is closed to new replies.