Protected riders makes sense, it’s based on previous performance so I don’t think it’s that unfair. Would be a shame not to see the best riders in the final because of a flat.
Let’s forget about the lower mental toll protected riders will experience (although I believe that could be a major factor for some riders).
I think you’re failing to take into account the fact that both the semi-finals and the finals earn you overall points (unless I’m misreading something). It’s no longer a question of the riders who should have qualified anyway despite a crash/mechanical/act of god/etc getting on the live feed. Now they are being artificially kept in the overall points competition purely because they are already in the overall points competition.
For example, Vali Holl should have left the race with no points from the finals because she shouldn’t have made the finals. Anymore than a protected rider should be allowed to have another go if they have a mechanical or a crash in their race run.
Qualis was always about just sorting out who was good enough to be in the main race. It made more sense to have protected riders there because the idea was the riders who were already in the top 10 had already proved they were fast enough to be there.
Now the ‘real’ racing starts with the semi-final, given the points awarded. If you crash or have a mechanical you shouldn’t be allowed to get more points in the final anymore than you should be allowed a do-over if you have a crash in a race run.
Now protected riders are able to take more risks, both in terms of riding style and in terms of bike set up, because the risks are simply not as great for them.
I just don’t think the impact of this semi-final format was properly thought through and the risk is that you’re creating a two tier system where the ‘stars’ are given an easier ride than riders who are already struggling just to establish themselves.