Why does bottled la...
 

Subscribe now and choose from over 30 free gifts worth up to £49 - Plus get £25 to spend in our shop

[Closed] Why does bottled lager taste better than canned?

54 Posts
42 Users
0 Reactions
1,124 Views
Posts: 8399
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Now I must admit, I do like a cold Stella in the garden in the summer.

I know how to and frequently have, brewed my own much better beer and lager but due to work and a house move haven't been brewing for a few months. SO Stella by the BBQ is my guilty pleasure.

However, why does bottled Stella taste much better in the bottles than it does in the cans?

I assume it's the same liquid and it's just pasteurised cooking lager, why does the canned stuff have a certain "twang" ?


 
Posted : 10/06/2017 4:55 pm
Posts: 17987
Full Member
 

I don't know but coke tastes way better in a glass bottle, second in a can, minging in a plastic bottle.


 
Posted : 10/06/2017 4:56 pm
Posts: 23221
Full Member
 

Same with Coca Cola. Water tastes wrong from a mug also.

'tis the bad ju-ju magic.

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 10/06/2017 4:58 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

[img] ?imgmax=800[/img]


 
Posted : 10/06/2017 5:02 pm
Posts: 6811
Full Member
 

Don't know but you are right.


 
Posted : 10/06/2017 5:04 pm
Posts: 3495
Free Member
 

They have slipped horse in there too, must be cheaper than the usual dogs piss.


 
Posted : 10/06/2017 5:14 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

It's artisan, Chester.


 
Posted : 10/06/2017 5:16 pm
Posts: 7751
Free Member
 

Growing trend of 'craft beers' being sold in cans.
Cost saving on packaging for brewers?
Can weighs less than bottle - lower shipping costs? More units per m3?


 
Posted : 10/06/2017 5:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It's in the mind. Guess you need something to make Stella appear drinkable 😉

Not that I drink much lager, prefer ales. Lager has to work with curry for me, and Stella doesn't unless I'm truly tanked up already. Also one of the few to give me a headache hangover, which makes me wonder what's in it.

More seriously though, pour something canned into a glass. Tends to taste nicer.

Not a patch on poured from pump and barrel though.


 
Posted : 10/06/2017 5:26 pm
Posts: 20
Free Member
 

Isn't it because glass is more inert, and therefore doesn't react with the liquid?


 
Posted : 10/06/2017 5:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Surely it should be nicer in the cans? No light getting in, no loss of carbonation and it'll stay fresher for longer. Perhaps there's some mellowing of the beer in the bottle that makes it taste a bit nicer.

I'll bet there's thousands of threads about this on craftbeertrackworld.


 
Posted : 10/06/2017 5:29 pm
Posts: 20
Free Member
 

Hmmm apparently cans offer the more authentic flavour as they are completely air tight.


 
Posted : 10/06/2017 5:35 pm
Posts: 2629
Full Member
 

Cans are much more readily recyclable than bottles and much lighter so greener all round. Although walking to pub a drinking draught wins...

Poured into glass I think it's pretty much the same as bottled


 
Posted : 11/06/2017 9:10 am
Posts: 1712
Free Member
 

Aren't the 'cans' in the pub cellar made of the same stuff?

'could be something galvanic going on or same as 'eating with your fingers' (?)


 
Posted : 11/06/2017 9:49 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It used to be that canned beer was a bit weaker than bottled


 
Posted : 11/06/2017 9:52 am
Posts: 7200
Full Member
 

A can is half the price of a bottle making an attractive proposition for the brewer. There is also more scope for advertising with a screen printed can .
There are 2 x mobile canning companies who offer on site canning making it more accessable than before.
Supermarkets are moving toward the craft can sector
Bottles create there own health risk with potential shards and as a weapon, PEN never really took off for festival plastic beer bottles.

Glass can let light through leading to sunstruck ( cats piss ) off flavours , so green or dark brown bottles used .

Cans have lower headspace = less potential for oxidisation , so should lead to better quality beer. However , there is still a taint which is detectable in light , softer beers with a metalic aftertatste. In bigger IPA styles this is alot less noticable.

Bottles have an oxygen scavenging membrane in the crown to help with taste preservation.

In terms of brewing and preperation the process is identical for canning and bottling . Why the big difference in taste has to be the packaging .


 
Posted : 11/06/2017 10:15 am
Posts: 10980
Free Member
 

Dissolved carbon dioxide produces carbonic acid, which attacks the aluminium causing that metallic taste.


 
Posted : 11/06/2017 10:20 am
Posts: 5182
Free Member
 

Poured into glass I think it's pretty much the same as bottled

STW needs a Mythbusters-type 'taste test' video channel on Youtube. In fact a STWbusters channel could blind-test all manner of stuff from 'Faster climbing with(out) bar-ends?' to 'which is the best pie out of these? Arguments to be [s]extended[/s] [s] settled[/s] furthered 😉


 
Posted : 11/06/2017 10:23 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Stella in cans is 5.1% and bottles 5.2% iirc. That 0.1% is clearly where all the flavour is


 
Posted : 11/06/2017 11:03 am
Posts: 7336
Free Member
 

Stella [s]ruined[/s] brewed in the UK is 4.8 and is reminiscent of rats piss flitered through a tramps sock. Stella brewed in Belgium is I believe still 5.2 and if memory serves is acceptable on to taste buds.


 
Posted : 11/06/2017 3:29 pm
Posts: 1930
Free Member
 

All Stella Artois is 4.8%. Has been for a few years now.

I think the finest bottled lagers are:

1. Staropramen
2. Budvar
3. Peroni


 
Posted : 11/06/2017 3:34 pm
 LAT
Posts: 2368
Free Member
 

Is that from the can as in drunk from the can? Pour it into a glass and it will taste better, if only because drinking from a can is vulgar, even went it is a premium product Iike Stella.


 
Posted : 11/06/2017 3:42 pm
Posts: 7897
Full Member
 

globalti - Member
Dissolved carbon dioxide produces carbonic acid, which attacks the aluminium causing that metallic taste.

Don't the newer 'craft' canned beers use an internal coating that stops this? Have certainly heard a couple of brewers on TV making this claim to justify their choice of can over bottle. Don't know enough to know whether this is true myself though.


 
Posted : 11/06/2017 3:43 pm
Posts: 8898
Free Member
 

Bought some bottled lager on offer recently which tasted pongy so there.


 
Posted : 11/06/2017 3:56 pm
 LAT
Posts: 2368
Free Member
 

Isn't staropramen a generic uk brew these days? I was out the country for a while and when I retired I bought a bottle of Star and was disappointed with the flavour read the label and it mentioned being brewed in the UK. Kingfisher has also changed in flavour since Shepherd Neame stopped brewing it.

Taste is of course a personal thing, but Pilsner Urquell is obviously the best widely available lager/pilsner.


 
Posted : 11/06/2017 3:59 pm
Posts: 41684
Free Member
 

The argument against cans is generally that they have more headspace and therefore harder to purge than bottles, but decent caning lines get around this by purging the whole line.

Bottles used to taste better as they would have live, unpasteurized beer in them. The yeast in the bottle consumes the oxygen which means the beer stays fresh.

The downside of bottles is they let light in giving lightstruck (Skunked) beer. This is a weird one because Corona, Sol, etc have made an entire industry selling people 'premium' beer to the point where people now think this is what beer is supposed to taste like.

You should never drink any beer from a bottle/can though,
1) it's too fizzy
2) you miss out on the aroma which impacts your perception of taste, which is why most people will tell you beer tastes nicer from a keg, it's the same beer as the can/bottle but it's in a glass. Cask is a different matter, but that's not lager.


 
Posted : 11/06/2017 8:12 pm
 isto
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Apparently all the craft breweries are switching to cans as it actually keeps flavour better than bottles. I heard this from a guy who is doing the artwork for a local craft brewery and they seem to know their stuff. I think some bigger ones like Beavertown also do only cans for the same reason.

Maybe the stuff you were previously drinking in cans is crap beer? Oh they were both Stella....maybe it tastes less bad in bottles. Sorry. 😉


 
Posted : 11/06/2017 11:10 pm
Posts: 3225
Free Member
 

Bottle are generally coloured to stop light ruining the beer. In an aluminium can.. no light.. lasts longer.
My brewmaster friend also advised that imported beer that has taken longer than necessary to clear through customs/distribution chain is obviously not as good as product that was just packaged..


 
Posted : 12/06/2017 2:04 am
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

Maybe the stuff you were previously drinking in cans is crap beer? Oh they were both Stella....maybe it tastes less bad in bottles.

As it can be made in different places it could be a difference. Continental producers had stricter rules on water etc where as brewed under licence means just the same recipe not the same quality. It's possible to use a cheaper set of ingredients and still be the same product just not the same taste.


 
Posted : 12/06/2017 2:09 am
Posts: 20649
Free Member
 

Although walking to pub a drinking draught wins...

Not a chance - Stella can be had for around 60p a pint in cans. In a pub it is easily £4+ around our way. I can't justify those sort of prices.


 
Posted : 12/06/2017 10:24 am
Posts: 1410
Full Member
 

I'm also with the OP. Bottles all the way.

I recon, its something with the glass keeping the beer cooler, typically smaller volumes so you don't get that warm dreggy bit.


 
Posted : 12/06/2017 10:41 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think it's psychological. With a can you just pop the tab and the contents of the can are there, easily accessed. A woman or a small child could do that. But a bottle, you need a tool for. And even with that tool you have to fight with the bottle. You and the bottle are locked in a primal struggle for survival, much like early man stalking a giant ground sloth on the plains, and you'll only prevail using wiles, ingenuity and guile.


 
Posted : 12/06/2017 10:52 am
Posts: 45
Free Member
 

Cans/bottles IME would seem to be a class thing but with craft beers that's being challenged now.

I wouldn't serve house guests cans.


 
Posted : 12/06/2017 11:03 am
Posts: 5182
Free Member
 

Cans/bottles IME would seem to be a class thing but with craft beers that's being challenged now.

I wouldn't serve house guests cans.

😯

Is it just my grumpy old cynicism, or does the term 'craft beers' make anyone else ...

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 12/06/2017 11:04 am
Posts: 1361
Free Member
 

Don't the newer 'craft' canned beers use an internal coating that stops this?

Yep that. My sister is opps manager in a craft brewery. Modern canning is cheaper, less wasteful, adaptable to different can sizes and now with the polymer coating doesn't affect the taste. The shape of cans also means less packaging than bottles and they don't break as easily. Lots of wins for very few losses.
Major breweries aren't using the coating so you still get the taste difference between can/bottle/tap


 
Posted : 12/06/2017 11:11 am
Posts: 77682
Free Member
 

I wonder if it's the beer that tastes different or the fact you can taste the can?

Get someone to pour a can and a bottle into a glass without telling you which is which, then see if you can tell them apart. I'd be surprised if you could do that reliably (you will of course have to go through several beers to be sure, for science).


 
Posted : 12/06/2017 11:11 am
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

Is it just my grumpy old cynicism, or does the term 'craft beer' make anyone else go...


It has a definition now meaning not from the main stream, you can hate the term but it should mean independent


 
Posted : 12/06/2017 11:13 am
Posts: 23296
Free Member
 

warms up quicker in a can.


 
Posted : 12/06/2017 11:14 am
 sbob
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

mudshark - Member

Cans/bottles IME would seem to be a class thing but with craft beers that's being challenged now.

I wouldn't serve house guests cans.

😆

Good to know you drink your wife-beater "with class".

What an amusing start to the day, cheers! 😀


 
Posted : 12/06/2017 11:26 am
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 12/06/2017 11:26 am
Posts: 45
Free Member
 

Good to know you drink your wife-beater "with class".

So can/bottle choice is nothing to do with class IYO? I'm curious.


 
Posted : 12/06/2017 11:53 am
Posts: 7556
Full Member
 

It really makes no difference assuming you actually pour it into a glass and don't drink the beer from the container you bought it in.


 
Posted : 12/06/2017 1:02 pm
 Nico
Posts: 4
Free Member
 

When you pour beer out of a can it passes over a sharp edge which causes bubbles to form and the beer to lose it's fizz.

Either way it's obviously a cue for extensive research. Probably need some controls too.


 
Posted : 12/06/2017 2:32 pm
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

It really makes no difference assuming you actually pour it into a glass

Assuming the same beer went into both.


 
Posted : 12/06/2017 2:37 pm
Posts: 20649
Free Member
 

I always shotgun my Stella so only cans will do. And it has the added benefit of being consumed before I have an opportunity to taste it.


 
Posted : 12/06/2017 2:39 pm
 sbob
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

johndoh - Member

I always shotgun my Stella so only cans will do.

You could always strawpedo as a last resort. 🙂


 
Posted : 12/06/2017 2:44 pm
Posts: 11
Free Member
 

Temperature has a lot to do with flavour - especially pilsner type beers which need to be drunk at a cool temperature to stop them tasting like piss...

My theory is that if you pour a canned Stella into a chilled glass it tastes more or less the same as straight from a chilled bottle. If sipped/quaffed straight from the can, you taste the metal - and possibly rats piss where they have crawled allover the cans in the warehouse 🙂


 
Posted : 12/06/2017 2:44 pm
Posts: 8399
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Oh they were both Stella....maybe it tastes less bad in bottles. Sorry

I think this is the answer.

I drink out of the bottle and pour the can into a glass.

So when I drink out of the bottle I can't really "taste" it, it's just cold, wet, fizzy and gives me a buzz after a few.

When I drink it out of a glass, then it shows it's true taste, which is a bit shit.


 
Posted : 12/06/2017 2:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

BigEaredBiker

If sipped/quaffed straight from the can, you taste the metal - and possibly rats piss where they have crawled allover the cans in the warehouse

How would you differentiate between the Stella and the rat piss though?


 
Posted : 12/06/2017 2:46 pm
Posts: 8866
Free Member
 

There's some proper beer snobs in here. Nothing beats that warm can of Stella for breakfast on the second day at a music festival.


 
Posted : 12/06/2017 3:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

+!

You should never drink any beer from a bottle/can though,
1) it's too fizzy
2) you miss out on the aroma which impacts your perception of taste, which is why most people will tell you beer tastes nicer from a keg, it's the same beer as the can/bottle but it's in a glass. Cask is a different matter, but that's not lager.


 
Posted : 12/06/2017 3:41 pm
Posts: 20649
Free Member
 

Nothing beats that warm can of Stella for breakfast on the second day at a music festival.

Just the thought of that makes me feel a little sick. You need to drink the first three quickly so you stop caring about it being warm.


 
Posted : 12/06/2017 3:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Glass bottles may also stop you growing tits

http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2014/06/bpa-free-plastics-tritan-nalgene-dangerous/


 
Posted : 12/06/2017 3:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

As an aside and the only way to drink lager is from a glass whatever the original container was, the best Lager in the world currently is brewed here in the UK, by a local company called Chapeldown and is named Curious Brew.
It also doesn't quite taste the same from a bottle as it does from a keg although pouring into a glass is acceptable, drinking from a bottle or a can cuts the nose out of the taste process which is detrimental.

It is known that canned lager doesn't taste as well as bottled, but once poured it would take a professional taster to tell the difference almost certainly you couldn't reliably every time.

Anyway,do yourselves a favour and try that Curious Brew, it quite literally is the champagne of lagers, being brewed with the champagne leftovers from their wine business and genuinely is the finest Lager I've sampled and I've tasted many from all over the world including pretty much every brauhaus in Munich.

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 12/06/2017 7:16 pm
Posts: 150
Free Member
 

Iv'e had a couple of cases of that from Majestic, fine stuff & I give it as gifts to non wine drinkers & they always compliment it, but it's not Leffe or Duval though 😉


 
Posted : 12/06/2017 7:34 pm