e_l -Don't know what you're talking about ……. You very clearly did not read correctly.
Well I guess it's always possible that I did not read something correctly.
Although in this case, I think that's it probably you that misread, ie :
"In response to glenp's post, you very clearly suggested ….."
.
That was not meant to be a dig about Marxism.
There's nothing wrong with having 'a dig' at Marxism, and I never accused you of doing so. I accused you of bringing Marx into the discussion for no other reason other than to have a dig at me – presumably because you were struggling to make a relevant point.
.
+ 1