Home Forums Chat Forum Trump strikes Syria

Viewing 40 posts - 41 through 80 (of 153 total)
  • Trump strikes Syria
  • binners
    Full Member

    So a gay bloke who’s in denial and is thus horribly overcompensating, is now banging heads with a terminally insecure bloke also trying to compensate for his extremely small… erm… hands?

    Its like the kebab house in a provincial town just after last orders on a Friday night, just with big blowy-uppy things

    deadlydarcy
    Free Member

    Trump in 2012:

    Now that Obama’s poll numbers are in tailspin – watch for him to launch a strike in Libya or Iran. He is desperate.

    Something doesn’t quite add up about the chemical weapons attack. A war he’s winning. Olive branches coming from all over the international community – “oh, I dunno lads, let’s do something completely outrageous.” Seems an utterly bizarre action for little military gain and international condemnation.

    The one question that comes to mind for me is, “Does this airstrike make it more or less likely that civilians will die from a chemical attack sometime in the future?”

    jambalaya
    Free Member

    why is Assad killing his own people?

    Inspired by the Arab Spring a portion of the population tried to overthrow him and thus started a civil war

    Obama talked tough after Assad’s use of chemical weapons but did very little. Trump has been more decisive.

    EDIT: I donagree with @deadly, I don’t understand why Assad would have launched a chemical attack for little gain but maximum likely response.

    IMO Assad with Russian help (they chose to get involved after being sanctioned by the West) has won. He will remain in power. The question is whether he will try and force the Turkish Army out of Northen Syria.

    mikey74
    Free Member

    So now Trump has alienated all those that voted for him on the promise of a more isolationist US, he’s alienated his best friends, Russia, and he’s made all middle Eastern countries angry. Not to mention killed a few people. All in a day’s work President Chump.

    martinhutch
    Full Member

    And as for any wet dreams of regime change at this point, it’s a bit bloody late for that. The rebels are pretty much finished, their last stand was Aleppo. Assad is at the mopping up stage.

    It’s a bit like turning up to help the Rebel Alliance about two days after the Death Star has blitzed the place and there are bits of Han Solo and some Ewoks floating around in space.

    The time for regime change was 2013, but there was no appetite for what that would involve. All the latest action does is highlight exactly how little power and influence the US has in the region.

    the-muffin-man
    Full Member

    “Does this airstrike make it more or less likely that civilians will die from a chemical attack sometime in the future?”

    If they have no planes to drop them from – then less likely.

    nickc
    Full Member

    Something doesn’t quite add up about the chemical weapons attack. A war he’s winning. Olive branches coming from all over the international community – “oh, I dunno lads, let’s do something completely outrageous.”

    As an argument, it has some weight, However the counter-argument that it takes serious amounts of pretty expensive kit and supplies to make these chemicals and that inconveniently for the “rebels” each time they get blown up by Assad’s forces accidentally harming innocent civilians, seems equally implausible.

    deadlydarcy
    Free Member

    @nickc, I wasn’t making any such counter argument. Just making the point that a chemical weapons attack at this stage by government forces seems pretty bizarre. Of course, it’s a crazy bizarre conflict, and who knows what can happen next at any given time.

    martinhutch
    Full Member

    Something doesn’t quite add up about the chemical weapons attack. A war he’s winning.

    It’s a war he’s won, with Russian assistance. We’re onto the customary next stage where he feels he can dish out punishment to the communities hew views as supporting rebel groups during the conflict.

    Assad will only look to Moscow for approval/disapproval of his activities. And if he can’t punish these communities from the air, he will do it by other means.

    TheFlyingOx
    Full Member

    the counter-argument that it takes serious amounts of pretty expensive kit and supplies to make these chemicals

    The rebels have chemical weapons.

    wilburt
    Free Member

    Trump doesn’t give a F about the Syrian kids but he (his advisors) knew this action would appeal to certain sort of person. Logically the whole thing stinks.

    Its like having petulant child in charge of the red button.

    binners
    Full Member

    Just to confirm….

    America is now bombing both ‘sides’ involved in this conflict, right?

    outofbreath
    Free Member

    “America is now bombing both ‘sides’ involved in this conflict, right?”

    Both sides? Aren’t there about 5 sides?

    martinhutch
    Full Member

    America is now bombing both ‘sides’ involved in this conflict, right?

    Trump would bomb downtown Seattle if it would boost his approvals.

    deadkenny
    Free Member

    Repeating history again. Seems we’ve forgotten about Iraq.

    Proof first, no matter how horrid Assad is, need proof. Proof that there are chemical weapons involved yes, but not who fired them, if anyone fired them at all. Russians claim Syrian strike hit a weapons dump containing chemical weapons and former UK ambassador to Syria agrees with this. Sounds rubbish and it’s easy to scoff and claim BS of anything Russia and Syria say, but again… remember Iraq?

    Anyway, proof or not, all this succeeds in doing is pissing off more people and making them hate the west, which leads to more terrorist attacks.

    jivehoneyjive
    Free Member

    A massive distraction which brings the media into line, stopping them from attacking Trump and researching his links to Russia, bringing about a public breakdown in relations between Trump and Putin.

    All very convenient.

    Still, probably a good time to invest in the arms trade…

    outofbreath
    Free Member

    “all this succeeds in doing is pissing off more people and making them hate the west, which leads to more terrorist attacks.”

    Does it? Bombing an airfield with prior warning strikes me as a very good way of making the point, without killing a load of people and pissing off a load more.

    martinhutch
    Full Member

    stopping them from attacking Drumpf and researching his links to Russia,

    I doubt it will, but if it gets his redneck core vote chanting ‘USA!USA!’ as their federal aid programmes and medicaid are slashed, it’s a win for the Donald.

    I just hope he’s pissed off Russia enough for them to start thinking about pulling the plug.

    Klunk
    Free Member

    pics from the airbase[/url]

    lazybike
    Free Member

    What concerns me is the way America keeps changing it’s mind..
    I remember the old days when a country had to go to the UN and get permission for military action…Americas gone rogue.

    devash
    Free Member

    I’m glad I live in the countryside for when this all kicks off globally.

    Having said that there’s a Rolls Royce factory 20 mins away in Barnoldswick which might get a pounding when the bombs start dropping. 😥

    kimbers
    Full Member

    I just hope he’s pissed off Russia enough for them to start thinking about pulling the plug.

    Russia still reeling from their own subway bombing last week, strong man Putin has a domestic audience to consider,
    he’s almost as unpredictable as Trump, But considerably smarter.
    USA claiming they know what place dropped sarin and follow up hit on hospital, the day Russians were present at airbase at the time- putting out an image of detailed knowledge of the situation.

    It’s got McCain backing Trump for the first time ever!

    letmetalktomark
    Full Member

    Worst SNL video to date.

    chum3
    Free Member

    Agree that the chemical attack makes little strategic sense for Assad and we’re being asked to believe that his ‘evilness’ is greater than his ‘stupidity’, and he doesn’t strike me as stupid…

    From Trump’s perspective, his only real strength is that people don’t know how to handle him – he’s too unpredictable / inconsistent / petulant. This is a perfect way to build that strength – a limited show of force to prove that he can and will take unilateral action, enhances his ‘nutter’ credentials.

    Deciding on a negotiation strategy against him must be a nightmare. Xi Jinping might be a little unbalanced by this…

    Something doesn’t quite add up about the chemical weapons attack.

    I wouldn’t underestimate the possibility for cock-ups, especially given the fog of war. I’m sure Assad doesn’t plan or even approve every mission, and he certainly doesn’t supervise arming the aircraft. I suppose Its perfectly possibly that some local commander overstepped the mark.

    mattyfez
    Full Member

    UN can’t do anything as Russia is a member and they would veto any action.

    So the choice is do nothing, which is what’s been happening, or countries go it alone like the Donald has.

    I’m not saying how wise or not this is, but that’s basically the situation.

    lazybike
    Free Member

    I’m glad I live in the countryside for when this all kicks off globally.

    We’ll all be living in the countryside if it kicks off globally…(it won’t)

    chum3
    Free Member

    I wouldn’t underestimate the possibility for cock-ups…

    Would make more sense, and combined with the fact that they supposedly gave up all their chemical weapons, paints them into a corner…

    maxtorque
    Full Member

    Obama *should* have the deaths of very many people on his conscience for his utter lack of giving a damn when chemical weapons were first used against innocent civilians

    Do you really think that? I suspect that actually he carefully weighed up all the evidence, took advice from people with expertise, and decided that, AT THAT TIME (<<< and this is the critical point) it was not a better to retaliate with force.

    So Trump has knocked a couple of holes in some bits of concrete, maybe destroyed a couple of planes. Those can (and will) be replaced quickly, you cannot “WIN” a war remotely, no matter what the generals and arms dealers of the USA might tell you (hence we got mired in Iraq/Afgan for so long)

    All this does, and it certainly doesn’t prevent any further use of chemical weapons, is make a complex situation, even more complex and difficult to defuse……

    maxtorque
    Full Member

    For a President who’s promised to massively increase spending on weapons, using $100M of cruise missiles to break up a bit of concrete is a very very good way indeed to get people supporting his call for more military spending………

    mattyfez
    Full Member

    It is.. But chemical weapons.. More’happy’ coincidence?

    Mind you.. 60 odd tomahawkes.. There can’t be much left of the airfield….

    outofbreath
    Free Member

    I wouldn’t underestimate the possibility for cock-ups,

    I’m coming round to thinking that whatever happened the Sarin came from Assad and that’s why this ‘punishment’ attack happened.

    So Asssad’s side failed to destroy a shell and it got mixed up with other shells, or a local commanded went mad or maybe the rebels got hold of it to use it to provoke the USA.

    Whatever happened, somehow Assad must have been careless with Sarin Gas to some degree.

    So I’m starting to think it wasn’t a punishment for deliberately attacking civilians with Sarin, it was a punishment for not destroying their Sarin or keeping it under lock and key. So, given the pre-warning, smashing up an airbase seems a reasonable response to me. (Whether a country should appoint itself as policeman and judge of these things is a different question!)

    outofbreath
    Free Member

    There can’t be much left of the airfield….

    On R4 this morning their expert said it could be up and running in 4 days.

    cranberry
    Free Member

    Do you really think that? I suspect that actually he carefully weighed up all the evidence, took advice from people with expertise, and decided

    Obama stated that the use of chemical weapons against civilians was a red line. He managed to get it right up to that point.

    Then the weapons were used because Assad correctly judged that Obama was weak and more interested in taking selfies of himself than protecting Syrians from their government:

    I consider that Obama’s inaction means that each chemical attack from that ignored red line, whilst not perpetrated by him, is partly his responsibility.

    All it takes for evil to triumph, is for good narcissistic, vain, weak men to do nothing.

    DrJ
    Full Member

    Are you really trying to conflate a change in immigration rules with a chemical warfare attack on a city ?

    Not remotely. I am saying that Trump claims to care about Syrian children one minute, but the minute before he was trying to prevent them from getting to safety.

    mattyfez
    Full Member

    On R4 this morning their expert said it could be up and running in 4 days

    Well I suppose if you just mean rebuilding a serviceable runway, it won’t take long, i suppose the real question is how much hardware was taken out at the same time, jets, ordinance and other expensive assets.

    Drac
    Full Member

    The Redline. Someone else spoke about that they said:

    “The only reason President Obama wants to attack Syria is to save face over his very dumb RED LINE statement. Do NOT attack Syria,fix U.S.A.”

    outofbreath
    Free Member

    “jets, ordinance and other expensive assets.”

    I’d hope they got the jets away given the pre-warning!

    But I assume the idea was to punish, not to hand the balance of power to Militant Islam, so presumably an ‘appropriate’ amount of damage has been done.

    Edukator
    Free Member

    59, FFS. They must have been coming up to their best before date and due for decommissioning.

    jivehoneyjive
    Free Member

    Pff, is but a drop in the ocean:

    Global arms trade reaches highest point since cold war era

    Still, I’m sure Rex Tillerson’s oil interests will be getting good value for money for the $95,000,000ish those missiles cost.

Viewing 40 posts - 41 through 80 (of 153 total)

The topic ‘Trump strikes Syria’ is closed to new replies.