Home Forums Bike Forum Trek Pipedream

  • This topic has 26 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 1 week ago by _tom_.
Viewing 27 posts - 1 through 27 (of 27 total)
  • Trek Pipedream
  • Blackflag
    Free Member

    https://www.pinkbike.com/news/trek-teases-steel-top-fuel.html

    A steel FS from Trek called the Pipedream. Looks very nice but a bit of a cheeky name. Be interested to know what those involved with Pipedream Cycles think about this?

    2
    faustus
    Full Member

    Looks pretty good that, and doesn’t have internal routing or a stupid cubby hole for your sandwich, all a massive bonus. Got a feeling it will be marketed as a bit more special than the normal Top Fuel, so will be ‘premium’ rather than ‘value’ version…though maybe they’ll be cheeky and undercut prices from the likes of Cotic and Starling etc…

    2
    sharkattack
    Full Member

    That’s the first desirable Trek I’ve seen in a very long time.

    Be interested to know what those involved with Pipedream Cycles think about this?

    Probably not bothered as there’s zero chance of this bike coming to market with that name.

    1
    Alex
    Full Member

    First Trek I’ve liked since my 29+ Stache hardtail.  Won’t be light tho. Or cheap I’m guessing.

    chestrockwell
    Full Member

    Looks good does that.

    1
    matt_outandabout
    Full Member

    Is this a way around new import tarrifs – get some good ol’ boys’ weldin’ some steel?

    4
    sharkattack
    Full Member

    Also worth pointing out for the people who don’t read the words that it’s just a cromo front triangle built by a Trek employee for fun. Not a press release of an imminent new bike.

    I do like the bike and the paint job though. It makes me wish that I could build things.

    voodoo-rich
    Full Member

    Take my money!

    1
    tomhoward
    Full Member

    That’s a great way to shaft a ton of small independent frame builders. I imagine Trek will be able to turn these out much cheaper in far greater number than any man in a shed set up.

    munrobiker
    Free Member

    It looks cool but isn’t the Top Fuel already hideously overweight compared to the competition? I’d have picked the Fuel EX to turn into a steel bike.

    3
    mashr
    Full Member

    tomhowardFull Member
    That’s a great way to shaft a ton of small independent frame builders. I imagine Trek will be able to turn these out much cheaper in far greater number than any man in a shed set up

    I’m not convinced that the same people that want a man in a shed frame are the same ones that walk into a Trek dealer

    sharkattack
    Full Member

    People who walk into Trek dealers get what they’re given.

    2
    weeksy
    Full Member

    People who walk into Trek dealers get what they’re given.

    Brilliant bikes ?

    1
    sharkattack
    Full Member

    Yeah sometimes. There’s a suggestion above that Trek customers don’t want steel bikes but it’s never really been an option. If they’re confronted with a range of steel bikes with cool paint jobs we might find that’s exactly what they want.

    IdleJon
    Free Member

    If they’re confronted with a range of steel bikes with cool paint jobs we might find that’s exactly what they want.

    I’d be all over it if they were in retro designs, say mid 90s, with the name Bontrager on the down tube and without any rear suspension…

    1
    ayjaydoubleyou
    Full Member

    Won’t be light tho

    might be surpising, steel front triangle is fairly simple large round tubing, with a few welded on mounts for the shock etc.

    the weight from steel frame bikes I think comes from the fiddly connections (ie the holes for a bearing need to be solid to actually get the bearings in, it doesnt need to be particularly strong but if you are building it from steel it will be heavy) and smaller but thicker sections of the rear triangle (thicker sections needed for impact, and the ability to actually weld the thing together, also being constrained to round tubes when they may not be the best option)

    chakaping
    Full Member

    It looks cool but isn’t the Top Fuel already hideously overweight compared to the competition? I’d have picked the Fuel EX to turn into a steel bike.

    +1

    But as mentioned, smells more like a publicity exercise than a product announcement.

    Still cool though, yeah.

    LAT
    Full Member

    It looks cool but isn’t the Top Fuel already hideously overweight compared to the competition? I’d have picked the Fuel EX to turn into a steel bike.

    This bike wouldn’t have the same competition as the top fuel.

    Is this a way around new import tarrifs – get some good ol’ boys’ weldin’ some steel?

    they’d probably still have to import the tubes. There are no bike tube manufacturers in the USA as far as I’m aware

    1
    joefm
    Full Member

    Is it shafting small manufacturers though?  If anything it’s a great nod to steel bikes

    stevie750
    Full Member

    People who walk into Trek dealers get what they’re given.

    In my case , a broken bike

    1
    tomhoward
    Full Member

    Very few turn much of a profit. If Trek can churn them out cheaper to the customer than its costs a Dawley, Stanton, Curtis etc to make, it’s hardly going to make their lives easier.

    2
    jfab
    Full Member

    It’s a tricky one to gauge, I think the majority of people that buy a Steel full-suspension are doing so as a conscious choice and often part of that is the image/feeling of having something that’s not mainstream.

    I could be completely wrong but I think most people that are currently buying a Cotic/Stanton/Starling steel full-suspension will still do that, and it’ll partly be because it doesn’t have Trek/Specialized etc. written on the downtube.

    I’m including myself in this, I have a couple of Cotics and I’m fully aware that part of the reason I have them (as well as looks/ride characteristics & Cotic service which are all great) is also because they don’t have a mainstream manufacturer written on the downtube and I’m sure I’m not the only one.

    LAT
    Full Member

    What jfab said, and trek seem to charge too much for their bikes, so would they be much cheaper than the “mainstream” niche manufacturers?

    I was thinking recently that trek aren’t so bad, independent, family owned, etc. when I saw this frame I thought, “groovy” (not the groovy who made steel suspension bikes a couple of decades ago, by the way).

    Then I was reminded in a post above about fisher and bontrager, then recalled lemond and klein. Then boost and proprietary shocks. Then i recalled  the the Koch brother also run an independent, family owned business. I now believe trek’s intentions with this frame are nefarious.

    mashr
    Full Member

    There’s a suggestion above that Trek customers don’t want steel bikes

    I said “man in a shed” rather than steel. Eg small (possibly boutique) brands rather than something you walk into the high street shop to get

    johnnystorm
    Full Member

    I now believe trek’s intentions with this frame are nefarious.

    Proper tin foil hat stuff. They’re in the business to sell bikes, and sold steel in the past.

    The combined sales of all gucci steel FS bikes is probably fewer than a single profitable bike from their line up.

    LAT
    Full Member

    Proper tin foil hat stuff. They’re in the business to sell bikes, and sold steel in the past.

    i think you are taking me too seriously, just a bit of hyperbole.

    _tom_
    Free Member

    It looks great, can’t beat those clean steel lines on any bike! Dawley T16 is still the dream frame though, I’d love to have one.

Viewing 27 posts - 1 through 27 (of 27 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.