Click the share link and you’ll get a URL you can share. Otherwise, take a screenshot and upload it to photobucket/flickr etc
Aracer: No, it wasn’t aimed at you, just a general observation. Like I said, it’s sensible given that we all want to avoid being squashed, so the conversation will always be: “the driver might be 100% wrong, but you could have done X to avoid it”.
Fair point. But he could also have been factually correct. E.g. The middle of the road (split into 3 lanes) could be the middle lane.
So what? the driver would STILL have been overtaking a right-signalling cyclist through a roundabout! So he could have been factually correct in his statement, but his driving was STILL illegal!
Edit: thinking about it, I would guess (yes, just an unsubstantiated guess!) that the driver thought the only reason he hit the cyclist was because the cyclist was too far to the right, i.e. “in the middle of the road”. The driver thinks that the cyclist should have been on the far left, he thinks that if the cyclist had have been there, depsite wanting to go right, he would have had room to overtake.
“You were in the middle of the road” rarely means:
“You were in the middle of the road, but you should have been further over to the right, to reinforce your right arm signal”. It pretty much always means “You were in my way, you should be against the kerb, that’s where cyclists are supposed to be.”