Home Forums Chat Forum That Maxxis "babes calendar" article…

Viewing 40 posts - 1,241 through 1,280 (of 1,437 total)
  • That Maxxis "babes calendar" article…
  • Cougar
    Full Member

    What percentage of the population manage to partake in responsible objectification with out resort to sex crimes or it cultivating a unhealthy attitude to the opposite sex.

    1) that’s the wrong question. The question you need to be asking is “what percentage don’t?

    2) WTAF is “responsible objectification” when it’s at home?

    Forcing self censorship

    Again, we’re going round in circles, I’ve said this before. It’s not “forcing” anything, it’s bringing to Maxxis’ (etc) attention that a group of people don’t like what they’re doing. They’re perfectly free to review their policies or ignore the feedback completely as they see fit. They might decide that actually, they don’t care because it raises money / is a bit of fun / appeals to their target audience / keeps young models in work / whatever, but at least they can make an informed decision rather than being oblivious.

    Cougar
    Full Member

    I have worked in the building trade all my life and never witnessed anyone shout look at the tits on that.
    How many times have you witnessed that cougar .

    Fair comment, I probably haven’t. Building trade was an unfair example, I was playing to a stereotype. However, I have seen groups of lads do it to random women on the street many, many times.

    aracer
    Free Member

    It’s interesting in a way if they have really pulled it as a result of this feedback – because that implies that somebody with power there doesn’t agree with the arguments made here by chip, dan et al.

    chip
    Free Member

    Cougar do you view porn.
    Has it turn you into sex pervert shouting sexual abuse at young ladies.

    If the answer is yes then no.
    Then that is responsible objectification. I made that up really.
    But you get what it means

    Cougar
    Full Member

    Cougar do you view porn.

    I don’t watch sport particularly, bar the occasional game of something I might be particularly interested in like the Superbowl or something. Mostly I’d rather go and do something in person.

    Same goes for porn really.

    aracer
    Free Member

    I’m a bit out of touch – what are the special occasions in porn which you do watch? 😉

    chip
    Free Member

    You did not mention builders as far as I am aware.
    I just see us heading for a nanny state what happened to taking responsibility of your own actions.
    Plenty of people indulge in objectification with out it leading to a twisted view of the opposite sex.
    And saying these calendars cause such behaviour is a cop out that some feminists might use as an excuse to get there own way.

    Cougar
    Full Member

    I’m a bit out of touch – what are the special occasions in porn which you do watch?

    Weddings, funerals, bar mitvahs.

    You did not mention builders as far as I am aware.

    Ah, good (so why bring it up?) I did type builders initially, then deleted it, hence my confusion. (I’m not very well I’m afraid, sorry)

    Cougar
    Full Member

    I just see us heading for a nanny state what happens to taking responsibility of your own actions.

    Slippery slope?

    And saying these calendars cause such behaviour is a cop out that some feminists might use as an excuse to get there own way.

    It’ll make a change from the men always getting their way, hey?

    chip
    Free Member

    Because I am one and stereotypically are blamed for such behaviour.

    chip
    Free Member

    And saying these calendars cause such behaviour is a cop out that some feminists might use as an excuse to get there own way.
    It’ll make a change from the men always getting their way, hey?

    I said feminists, not women. You are sick.

    DrJ
    Full Member

    The fact is that some men do have dodgy attitudes and sexual behaviour, and they’re not getting them from a vacuum – they’re coming from somewhere.

    I’d say they get them from observing real life, not fantasies – from watching how their family and friends act, and from the roles that society has given women. Women have been “second class citizens” for centuries, long before Maxxis calendars, or any other calendars. That’s a theory, and as 2 datapoints to support it, I mentioned Sweden and Saudi Arabia.

    molgrips
    Free Member

    I am not against the sex industry. Although I do not watch porn.

    aracer
    Free Member

    Not even special occasion porn like Cougar?

    poah
    Free Member

    its probably special porn he watches

    TurnerGuy
    Free Member

    Because men aren’t marginalised, objectified, victimised and generally viewed (by some people) as second-class citizens in the same way women are.

    and yet we allow ‘faith’ schools to exist in this country that are indoctrinating their children with views like this.

    There was story in the news recently about a school governor that had to sit “out of sight” of the men at an Islamic school.

    An ex-labour councilor was on LBC reciting similar issues when canvassing, how the women of the ‘asian’ households where directed by the men as to how they should vote (this was incidental to the issue she had phoned in to talk about).

    We court relationships with countries that force their schoolchildren to burn to death in a fire at a school because they were not correctly attired to be seem in public and therefore leave the building to escape the fire.

    v8ninety
    Full Member

    and yet we allow ‘faith’ schools to exist in this country that are indoctrinating their children with views like this.

    Yep, it’s disgusting. Religion has no place in delivering education. If it was up to me I’d get rid of CofE, Catholic and Islamic schools. Unfortunately, while this country is happy to allow CofE and Catholic schools, it’s on a bit of a hypocritical sticky wicket criticising some of the more ‘hardline’ Islamic schools. It’s not like Carholisism has a particularly strong record on misogyny, after all.

    molgrips
    Free Member

    and yet we allow

    Another brick in the wall…

    bill-oddie
    Free Member

    wow they took it down – not just the calendar but the whole babes marketing thing!
    http://www.maxxis.co.uk/babes%5B/url%5D

    Thats a great acheivment and makes me feel less cynical about the world. Props also to Maxxis for listening. I wonder if they’ll still have “babes” at MX events and trade shows….

    (I expect this may well have already been posted up and I’ve not seen it cos the thread has a gazillion posts)

    johnx2
    Free Member

    that’s good.

    (traumatised guys please note that other naff mtb calendars featuring scantily clad young women remain available – as an eyebrow-raising google image search just now has confirmed)

    If we dealt with all the more important issues first, before getting to how to sell tyres without annoying your customers, we’d have a bit of a wait. If I applied similar rules to my life I’d never make a cup of tea.

    anagallis_arvensis
    Full Member

    Blah blah blah blah blah

    molgrips
    Free Member

    Wow, I didn’t know that the babes were a thing in their own right, not just a calendar..

    chip
    Free Member

    They are their promotional models mole grips the sort 100s of company’s not just the motor sport trade use at events, shows and race days.

    The sort I think you have previously claimed to not agreeing with.

    Junkyard
    Free Member

    37 pages and you did not even read the link on the calendar

    You are so STW 😉

    Indeed very progressive of them to do charity work with “babes”

    scotroutes
    Full Member

    Given molgrips’ revelation, can we start the thread again?

    molgrips
    Free Member

    They are their promotional models mole grips the sort 100s of company’s not just the motor sport trade use at events, shows and race days.

    Does that make it ok?

    The sort I think you have previously claimed to not agreeing with.

    And I still don’t. That’s wow as in ‘wow that’s bad’ not ‘wow look at that lovely crumpet’

    binners
    Full Member

    Junkyard
    Free Member

    SHall we do it xmas day to give us somethign to do?

    chip
    Free Member

    Does that make it ok?

    It does not bother me either way.

    don’t. That’s wow as in ‘wow that’s bad’ not ‘wow look at that lovely crumpet’

    Wow made me believe you were surprised that such things went on. And the use of babes by maxxis was exceptionally bad.

    chip
    Free Member

    I’m off to the dentist for a check up mole grips, see you later.

    binners
    Full Member

    TurnerGuy
    Free Member

    Those Maxxis babes are probably now going to be made redundant just in time for Christmas – well done STW I hope you feel proud of yourselves 🙁

    won’t someone think of the glamour models…

    Cougar
    Full Member

    That’s what got us into this mess in the first place. (-:

    faustus
    Full Member

    This is the longest car crash ever. I’m glad I lost the will to live 20-odd pages ago..

    tpbiker
    Free Member

    read the first 2 pages and the last 2 pages…didnt have time for the other 32..

    Can I assume its 32 pages of bickering between the usual hand wringing suspects and those that are taking the stance of ‘its not really a big deal, don’t like it don’t buy it’…

    Culmination being that the calender is pulled being seen as a victory for the PC brigade?

    I asked a few female mates about this calander last night in the pub, none of them gave a shit about it..

    Which begs the question why, if 4 perfectly balanced females don’t consider it offensive in the least, why do a bunch of middle aged mountainbiking nerds…?

    scotroutes
    Full Member

    That’ll be either because they haven’t grown up yet OR they’ve been conditioned to accept it by a male-dominated society.

    Allegedly.

    faustus
    Full Member

    Well if I must…but no more:

    Because perfectly balanced though they may be, they aren’t spokespersons for womenhood, and shouldn’t be thought of that way. An anecdote from a few other women doesn’t nullify the argument. There’s probably an analogy about racism from using this kind of anecdotal argument, but that was pages 33-34 or something, best not go there again. But I think you can guess what I mean.

    Shockingly, the default female view isn’t necessarily a feminist or gender equality one. So really the gender of a person doesn’t necessarily define their view on sexism or gender equality, and nor should it. Hence why ‘middle-aged mtb nerds’* are talking about it, as they should.

    *i’m not middle-aged

    Cougar
    Full Member

    Nerd.

    chip
    Free Member

    But when a couple of women posting on here said they disagreed with it. I was instructed by the against middle aged nerds that I had heard it from the horses mouth and my argument was invalid because of this.

    *i don’t ride a mountainbike

    faustus
    Full Member

    Yup. I can think of worse things to be 🙂

Viewing 40 posts - 1,241 through 1,280 (of 1,437 total)

The topic ‘That Maxxis "babes calendar" article…’ is closed to new replies.