Stones at Glastonbu...
 

Subscribe now and choose from over 30 free gifts worth up to £49 - Plus get £25 to spend in our shop

[Closed] Stones at Glastonbury

112 Posts
64 Users
0 Reactions
540 Views
Posts: 431
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Is it just me or are they way passed their sell by date 😯


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 10:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

past.

And yes.


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 10:02 pm
Posts: 31058
Free Member
 

I'll just copy and paste what I wrote on the what are you doing right now thread:

I'm guessing some people at the concert will be convincing themselves that "they've still got it". But, this just looks a bit embarrassing. I thought they looked old when I saw them in 1997. Somebody is behind the stage doing the real drumming, right?


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 10:03 pm
Posts: 1816
Free Member
 

The drummer looks like Earl off the wonga.com adverts....


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 10:03 pm
Posts: 1812
Free Member
 

Rolling bones.
6/10 Thats being kind, flat sound.


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 10:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img][URL= http://i216.photobucket.com/albums/cc48/jadedwhispers/OldRockers.gi f" target="_blank">http://i216.photobucket.com/albums/cc48/jadedwhispers/OldRockers.gi f"/> [/IMG][/URL][/img]


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 10:05 pm
Posts: 34062
Full Member
 

im sure paint it black & sympathy for the devil will be good but it they look pretty bad so far


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 10:06 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

I'd want some sort of refund ...


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 10:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Im bored with their set already, the crowd look bored too. Its amazing what a bit of radio 1 hype can do. Id rather be watching wiley 😉

Amazing bands out there at the moment with jaw dropping sets, Muse for example, or even example, who had the crowd bouncing solidly for every song, and they have this lot headlining 🙁

I know they are influential, and pivotal in their day, but for the love of god, let them retire!


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 10:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I am watching in a macabre way. It's a shame that this is what the mainstream music industry hinges on in this day and age.


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 10:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Shocking, I can't believe they insist on touring, wrinkly has beens that need to retire.
Give it up Mick


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 10:08 pm
Posts: 16
Free Member
 

Oh dear. Who the **** put this set list together?


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 10:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Finally


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 10:10 pm
Posts: 34062
Full Member
 

on the subject of animated corpses

walking dead season 3 has just started on C5


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 10:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Does Jagger have a striking resemblance to Iggy Pop?


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 10:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Public enemy on BBC4


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 10:13 pm
Posts: 31058
Free Member
 

im sure paint it black & sympathy for the devil will be good but it they look pretty bad so far

Sympathy for the Devil a bit shit. So, all hopes resting on Paint it Black. 🙂


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 10:13 pm
Posts: 13554
Free Member
 

They should have split up gracefully at the tail end of the 70's. Some bands or artists get better with age, not the Stones though 😥


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 10:13 pm
Posts: 34062
Full Member
 

bring the noise bbc4, now!


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 10:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Trying to guess what's on their rider...

Can you snort Horlicks?


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 10:15 pm
Posts: 31058
Free Member
 

Ah **** it, this is the worst thing since Coldplay. Public Enemy it is then.


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 10:15 pm
Posts: 13554
Free Member
 

Trying to guess whats on their rider.

Sanatogen, Werthers Original and Ovaltine


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 10:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Johnny Marr on the red button or Chase and Status on BBC3.


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 10:18 pm
Posts: 31058
Free Member
 

Oh great - a lecture from Public Enemy. 😐


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 10:18 pm
Posts: 584
Free Member
 

why is he squarking like a parriot


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 10:18 pm
Posts: 31058
Free Member
 

Ah that's more like it. 🙂


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 10:19 pm
Posts: 215
Full Member
 

Yep. Better choices. On´t red button.


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 10:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

its prosaicly apt that the stones on the stage have actually been around a lot longer than the ones standing a couple of fields away.


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 10:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Jnr (11) wanted to stay up to, I was in the office watching Public Enemy 🙂

I went in to him to ask him what he thought - bit boring.... "well they are 70-odd", "oh really I thought they were new". 😆


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 10:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Tight set from Johnny Marr.


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 10:25 pm
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

Are you lot actually listening to this?
Obviously not, by some of the comments above.

Surprisingly good so far - pretty tight, Jagger's in tune and the crowd are enjoying it.

I was expecting a car crash, but they're excellent.


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 10:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

hip replacement time rather than bein hip but they have got the crowd goin...... cant argue with the cataloge of hits they can delve into either and better than a lot of sh*t* ive seen there this year?


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 10:33 pm
Posts: 1816
Free Member
 

Rusty Spanner - Member
Are you lot actually listening to this?
Obviously not, by some of the comments above.
Surprisingly good so far - pretty tight, Jagger's in tune and the crowd are enjoying it.
I was expecting a car crash, but they're excellent.

You are Pinocchio and I claim my five pounds 😀


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 10:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Rusty, I think we can appreciate what the Stones have done for popular music. They resurrected the careers of some blues legends and made some great songs. It may not even be a bad set, however maybe they should move aside and pass the baton to the next generation.


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 10:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

They are garbage


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 10:35 pm
Posts: 34062
Full Member
 

rusty spanner my freeview reception must be shagged then because they sound awful


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 10:37 pm
Posts: 31058
Free Member
 

Are you lot actually listening to this?

Well I was. For around three songs. And it was shit. No, it was beyond shit. It was what shit turns into when it gets too old.


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 10:37 pm
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

You are Pinocchio and I claim my five pounds 😀

Er, no not really.

I'm just not despeartely trying to reinforce my musical credibility by judging something before I've heard it. 🙂


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 10:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No i dont think so - garbage did stupid girl?


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 10:40 pm
Posts: 3601
Free Member
 

I like the stones but watching this is not great i'm not getting it, but to be there must be kin amazing !

sound is sh1te watching on virgin HD through the stereo but something is seriously lacking with the quality cos everything else has sounded spot on

...how is jagger so skinny ?


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 10:48 pm
Posts: 11357
Full Member
 

Yeah?.......It really sounds like the Glasto audience had a shit time as well if the encores were anything to go by, enjoy it for what it is fer ****s sake ya bunch of pretentious cretins, one of the most iconic supergroups ever, playing one of the most iconic festivals ever 🙄


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 10:56 pm
Posts: 34062
Full Member
 

one of the most iconic supergroups ever,

have the spice girls reformed?


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 10:58 pm
Posts: 56812
Full Member
 

Chase and Status on the other stage looked like infinitely more fun than watching than a bunch of pensioners who haven't recorded anything worth listening to since the early 70''s


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 11:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Somafunk. If you really want to see the audience have a good time, Prodigy or Orbital sets from previous years fit the bill.


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 11:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It really sounds like the Glasto audience had a shit time as well if the encores were anything to go by, enjoy it for what it is fer **** sake ya bunch of pretentious cretins

Well if you're not actually there soaking up the atmosphere and feeling the euphoria, and are instead at home watching it, it does give you the opportunity to focus on Jagger's singing, which was, quite frankly, shite.


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 11:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

At the gig... Just back to wall whilst the masses leave.

Haven't heard a bad comment so far!

My opinion

70 year olds owning a crowd like they did!!!... Very few bands in the 15 years that I've been coming to glastonbury have achieved that.

Tonight the stones rocked !! Seriously


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 11:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Thought they (Stones) were OK, TBH. Chase and Status, on the other hand, were/are awesome.
Primal Scream, by any measure, [i]are[/i] utter shite.


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 11:13 pm
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

Primal Scream, by any measure, are utter shite.

Normally love Primal Scream, but that set earlier was a mess.

Bobby G looked & sounded worse than I've seen him for ages - couldn't carry a tune in a bucket tonight.


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 11:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Couldn't agree more

Chase and status won me over a few years ago at the iow festival

Haven't seen then since but would love to.

The crowd just goes mental


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 11:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well at least we know where all the wrinkled skin from the 10 stone testicle went....main stage headline glastonbury.


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 11:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I thought Primal Scream were pretty good apart from Bobby Gillespie. Seemed weak vocally. As for The Stones, I don't care how good or bad they may have been, they should NOT be headlining Glastonbury in 2013. The fact they were is a sad indictment on the music scene.


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 11:25 pm
Posts: 31058
Free Member
 

I caught a few songs from the Rudimental set earlier. Now that I would love to have been there for. Crowd looked like they were loving it.


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 11:27 pm
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

Seemed weak vocally.

Really?

Looked stoned out of his mind to me.
Cheeky bastard, people had paid good money to see that.


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 11:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've been to loads of old raves and festivals and up until a few years back always had Glastonbury on my bucket list. Seriously though the whole festival scene seems absolute shite to a 42 year old , When bands like Mumford and sons headline the worlds biggest festival you know music has gone bland.

My 17 year old daughter has been to TITP for the last 2 years and chose Calvin Harris over the Stone Roses 😥
When cretins like Example can have 30,000 watching them you know live music is finished.

Still Chase & Status looked like a post rave Prodigy.


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 11:46 pm
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

Deleted.

I'm trying to be nice tonight. 😀


 
Posted : 29/06/2013 11:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You are right rusty, however why should that be the case with Glastonbury? I would like to see the organizers stick two fingers up to the money men to attract a more edgy crowd, however that does not put pounds in financiers pockets. I would feel a bit depressed if my kids went to a festival in 20 years time to see a 90 year old Stones strut their stuff. The digital age has allowed some great (little heard of) music to become available to the masses, but the Glastonbury behemoth is blinding people to it.


 
Posted : 30/06/2013 12:00 am
Posts: 11357
Full Member
 

You do realise there's more to Glastonbury than the main stage?, it's quite possibly one of the most eclectic musical festivals as there are hundreds of obscure acts on in 30+ stages in obscure areas over the 900 acre site and as for sticking two fingers up the money men? - it has to draw a crowd to pay for the approximately 500 acts booked, and to pay for the tens of thousands of workers onsite.

And yeah, prodigy were good, one of my fav sets was darren emmerson/james lavelle but the chem bros was something special indeed.

I've trudged/crawled/been dragged/left for dead about the site quite a few times over the past 20yrs 😉


 
Posted : 30/06/2013 12:25 am
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

Other festivals are available 🙂
There are loads more festivals than there used to be, from small scale niche stuff to the corporate ****fests that the bigger names have become.
You can choose whichever suits your taste in music and political ideology.

I'm a regular at Evilstock myself, along with about 250 other people. 😀
It's free and it hasn't got enough toilets, both essentials for a decent weekend.

I would feel a bit depressed if my kids went to a festival in 20 years time to see a 90 year old Stones strut their stuff. The digital age has allowed some great (little heard of) music to become available to the masses, but the Glastonbury behemoth is blinding people to it.

Hmmmmm, I'm not sure you know.

I reckon the digital age has allowed many more bands to be heard and to establish a decent, loyal core following.
It's democratised music to a great extent - if you have an audience out there, you can find them.


 
Posted : 30/06/2013 12:35 am
Posts: 33515
Full Member
 

Who the **** are Chase and Status? Have they actually done anything meaningful? I wouldn't recognise a single 'tune' of theirs, and I certainly wouldn't recognise them if they walked on stage.
But then, I'm not 'street', or 'Urban', or from London, so that makes me irrelevant, I s'pose. 🙄
And Primal Scream? Third-rate Stones impersonators, and always have been.

I would feel a bit depressed if my kids went to a festival in 20 years time to see a 90 year old Stones strut their stuff. The digital age has allowed some great (little heard of) music to become available to the masses, but the Glastonbury behemoth is blinding people to it.

Bollocks. There are 2000 acts playing Glastonbury, and a pretty large chunk have got there precisely because of the democratisation of music via the Internet, and the likes of 6Music, but all a bunch of Internet warriors can do is snivel about one headline act.


 
Posted : 30/06/2013 12:40 am
Posts: 770
Free Member
 

Well, the stones sounded pretty good where I was standing.
But i'm sure watching it on tv gives you a more valid opinion.


 
Posted : 30/06/2013 3:51 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Never mind the stones two bands that have stood out over everyone so far, four 15 year old irish lads called the Strypes and best of all Alabama shakes what a voice she has.


 
Posted : 30/06/2013 5:36 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Who the **** are Chase and Status?

My wife last night while watching them..... "I didn't know Jason Statham was black??" 😆


 
Posted : 30/06/2013 6:30 am
Posts: 407
Free Member
 

I think some of you need to get a new television if you thought that was bad. Brilliant set and sound quality, excellent on my TV!


 
Posted : 30/06/2013 6:43 am
Posts: 16
Free Member
 

Hmm, it sounds like us at home are the victims of the BBC's poor editing. This morning's paper says they kicked off with Jumping Jack Flash and It's only rock n roll which makes more sense than how it started on the beeb.


 
Posted : 30/06/2013 7:27 am
Posts: 407
Free Member
 

BBC were only allowed to broadcast from a certain point in the gig.


 
Posted : 30/06/2013 7:36 am
Posts: 734
Free Member
 

The Rolling Stones would only let the BBC show 1hr of their set so it looks like the Beeb chose to miss the start. Which made it feel like a bit of a damp squibe in my opinion.

Edit -beaten by 4 whole minutes. Wow I'm a fast typer!


 
Posted : 30/06/2013 7:40 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

heard Jo Whiley talking for 3.7 seconds so turned off before I smashed my own face in. Bizarrely there was a PE cover band on BBC 4 that were mildly entertaining. The Beeb must be embarrassed having to try and tun this years 'thin' line up into the usual BBC 'over hyped to death' spectacle.

However, features about hula hoop therapists and different types of tents kept me glued to the TV. zzzzzzzzzzz


 
Posted : 30/06/2013 7:43 am
Posts: 77686
Free Member
 

Well, hello from a field at Glastonbury. (-:

Caught the start of the Stones set last night; we were behind approximately 200,000 other people and it's hard to comment as they might as well have been playing on an iPhone for what we could see and hear. Can tick the "I was there" box at least.

Stuck it out for three songs and then sloped off to Chase & Status (via Strumpets with Crumpets). Not my paper cup of tea but credit where it's due, they tore the roof off.


 
Posted : 30/06/2013 8:49 am
Posts: 734
Free Member
 

Chase & Status........they tore the roof off.

In a field....WOW.


 
Posted : 30/06/2013 9:10 am
Posts: 7336
Free Member
 

Just watched it on iplayer.

Pretty bloody awesome actually. Damn fine amount of energy and a brilliant catalogue. Enjoyed it.


 
Posted : 30/06/2013 1:04 pm
 ianv
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Watched it on iplayer this morning and cannot understand the negativity. They rocked, pretty good for any band but when you consider their ages they were awesome.


 
Posted : 30/06/2013 1:34 pm
Posts: 14777
Full Member
 

cannot understand the negativity

Theyre nowhere near niche enough for the scenesters on here


 
Posted : 30/06/2013 2:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

As I was doing my annual replacement of my chainring, chain and sprocket this morning, my neighbour was playing it loudly. Oh dear oh dear...

Someone should've taken the stones aside back in 1980 and said enough is enough.

Wimbledon or Glasto? Given this limp performance I'd say that Glasto wins the cringe stakes.


 
Posted : 30/06/2013 3:44 pm
Posts: 2338
Full Member
 

Well, I watched them on the ipad this morning, with the sound plugged through the HiFi and I thought they were great. Tight as a nat's chuff. They should be good with 50 years' rehearsal behind them. Good to see Mick Taylor join them too.


 
Posted : 30/06/2013 4:00 pm
Posts: 5938
Free Member
 

I enjoyed watching The Orb and some tribal drumming, followed by Dizzee Rascal, then Alt-J and Foals. What else shall I watch? Not interested in the Stones.


 
Posted : 30/06/2013 4:09 pm
Posts: 33515
Full Member
 

I enjoyed watching The Orb and some tribal drumming, followed by Dizzee Rascal, then Alt-J and Foals. What else shall I watch? Not interested in the Stones.

PIL.


 
Posted : 30/06/2013 6:11 pm
Posts: 5938
Free Member
 

Why?


 
Posted : 30/06/2013 6:19 pm
Posts: 20
Free Member
 

FWiW A friend of mine is there at the moment and he said they absolutely bombed. I watched a bit on iPlayer and none of the band looked interested.

TBH I've never been a fan. Apart from a couple of decent tracks, their material ranges from the bland to the rubbish IMO. Live, they don't appear to be much better, and watching Jagger do his little dance moves on stage these days is just embarrassing.


 
Posted : 30/06/2013 8:05 pm
Posts: 5958
Full Member
 

They play music, its what they do. I ride my bike and hope I'm still doing it when I'm their age. The people on the news this morning seemed to have enjoyed and that's all that matters. Muse? Come on that song they did for the Olympics was so bad nobody wanted to play it.


 
Posted : 30/06/2013 8:11 pm
 loum
Posts: 3623
Free Member
 

The big problem with Glastonbury this year is that the red button options have replaced the guess the price play-a-long game on Antiques Roadshow. The wife is not happy.


 
Posted : 30/06/2013 8:17 pm
Page 1 / 2