cubist
Free Member
I feel really conflicted about whether the riders should be encouraged to take such a mental set of risks.
Me too, but… Well, I think I’m right that it’s no longer points scoring for the tour, and is back to being a standalone? Which if so is good, reduces pressure to enter, it was a really bad idea. And the sheer madness of it means there’s just not many people who can even consider it, being invitational takes away a lot of the risk there too. Like, first you have to be one of the best mountain bikers to have ever lived, and then you also need other people to agree with you, and these days you pretty much have to surround yourself with supporters/strong opinions too ie people who will tell you no.
Everyone up there is qualified to make those calls, is the main thing, and none of them’s daft. And seeing stuff like the wind cancellations, where you get to see in real time the competitors judging the risks and rewards and seeing how that works out (and how much the organisers are driven by the riders for stuff like that) is a good thing too I reckon. That people still walk away after all the buildup says a lot.
If they would just do more to look after the riders, that’s the change I’d like to see.
But yeah if nothing else does feel like sooner or later a tired dried-out builder’s going to step off a cliff.