Home Forums Bike Forum Silly Gear Ratio Question

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • Silly Gear Ratio Question
  • letmetalktomark
    Full Member

    😕

    Is a 2:1 ratio ever going to change the efficiency of pedaling?

    E.g.

    Will a 32:16 pedal the same as a 24:12 or a 40:20?

    I expect the answer to be no but I cannot get my mind in gear this morning and decide for myself!

    wwaswas
    Full Member

    you may get marginally more friction with a 40:20 and less chain security with a 24:12 but they’ll pretty much pedal the same on the same size wheel.

    letmetalktomark
    Full Member

    wwaswas – Member

    you may get marginally more friction with a 40:20 and less chain security with a 24:12 but they’ll pretty much pedal the same on the same size wheel.

    That what I though – well I think I did! 😆

    Thank you 8)

    crogthomas
    Free Member

    With larger chainrings and sprockets there is less friction in the chain due to the smaller angle through which each chain link has to turn as it conforms to the sprocket. This makes using larger sprockets more efficient. I’ve no idea how much more efficient though, I’d bet you’d not be able to notice. Larger sprockets will last longer though, so that’s a good enough reason to use them.

    letmetalktomark
    Full Member

    crogthomas – Member
    Larger sprockets will last longer though, so that’s a good enough reason to use them.

    Why is that?

    crogthomas
    Free Member

    Load and therefore wear is spread over a greater number of teeth. Ever noticed that it is the smaller sprockets on a cassette that seem to wear out first?

    letmetalktomark
    Full Member

    crogthomas – Member

    Load and therefore wear is spread over a greater number of teeth. Ever noticed that it is the smaller sprockets on a cassette that seem to wear out first?

    Thought this was solely down to usage 😳

    Aidan
    Free Member

    Smaller sprockets are definitely not as good.

    I used a 22t chainring for Iditarod in 2009 and wore it out in 350 miles. I used a 28t front and a bigger rear this time and it was still in decent shape after 100 miles.

    thepodge
    Free Member

    my lbs was on about top dead centre the other day, not the faintest idea what that is but bigger is better according to him.

    Padowan
    Free Member

    Bigger cogs need a longer chain (assuming singlespeed), making more weight, making it tougher when climbing.

    Otherwise I’d say it’s down to wear (more on smaller cogs).

    Oh, the other point is that if it’s on a bike with suspension, the cog size will change the chainline and potentially affect the linkage, giving a reduction in efficiency.

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)

The topic ‘Silly Gear Ratio Question’ is closed to new replies.