In fairness, Onion; those companies have been advertising on STW for longer than they’ve been selling these silly things. Plus I wouldn’t imagine STW would be too willing to give up the revenue the likes of CRC provide. Although it would be interesting to find out how many STW advertisers sell them.
On the other hand, would CRC want to lose out on being able to advertise on one of the most popular cycling websites on Earth?
It’s an interesting conundrum. I can’t see as there’s any simple answers. Tis a fair and valid point you make, however.
Pressure on companies like CRC, through email and even total boycott, would work.
But then, if they’ve got X product at a lower price than anyone else, will your principles remain so firm?
Maybe it’s products like Powerbaynd, that bring lots of profit, that enables the sale of other stuff at lower prices?
Innertubes cost what, a quid, even including VAT? And they sell for a fiver? Why? Because bike shops can, pure and simple. Because they know we’ll need them.
The difference with Powerbaynd is that it’s just a bit of plastic and rubber, that offers no benefits whatsoever. It’s the spurious claims that are unethical, not the selling of the things.
Still wish I’d thought something like that up though….