While my original couple of U31 and variations of that username may have had multiple bans after one particular mod royally pissed me off, (Barnsley mitch, nail on the head, overmoderation at that time,
I’ve just looked back and the final post from “U31” predates me being a moderator by two years, so I can’t really comment on that I’m afraid.
The problem with one or two of the mods is their lack of impartiality.
Is that directed at me? I do try to be, well, as honest and transparent as I can be (hence replying to questions in public). Though really, true impartiality is very difficult.
It would be kind of hard for him to post his usual shit stuff without making it blindingly obvious who he was.
See, it’s kind of self policing. Someone gets a ban for bellendery, they either come straight back on being bellendish in which case they light up like a Christmas tree, or they behave themselves and fly under the radar but then all we wanted folk to do is be more middle-of-the-bell in the first place so the system’s worked.
Spotting a returned banee is routine, they’ll generally get flagged up internally within a day or two of their arrival (me not so much, but one of my colleagues is very good at this). Working out who it is is a fun game a bit more difficult, but proving it conclusively can be a challenge.
In an ideal world we like to be certain before hammering but of course, that’s not a mandatory policy. (-: