- This topic has 19 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 7 months ago by tjaard.
-
New Affordable Shimano ESSA, Short Reach Levers, and Cross Compatibility
-
stwhannahFull Member
Hang on a minute, cross compatibility… affordable groupset… short reach levers so everyone can ride bikes… it’s not a late April Fool, it’s a ha …
By stwhannah
Get the full story here:
New Affordable Shimano ESSA, Short Reach Levers, and Cross Compatibility
2ballsofcottonwoolFree Membershort reach levers and shifters, yay! 170mm cranks <facepalm>
1ratherbeintobagoFull MemberSorry – for the hard of thinking, what’s so wrong with two finger braking?
squirrelkingFree MemberSorry – for the hard of thinking, what’s so wrong with two finger braking?
Wondering that myself. Unless it’s that thing where you’re supposed to be dragging your brakes all the time?
dirkpitt74Full MemberWonder how the short reach shifter will be for kids?
Biggest gripe I have on kids bikes is the fact the kids can’t change gear with a lot of the thumb shifters – and some of the grip shifts are really bad (I have trouble with a couple of them!)
1DickBartonFull MemberDisc brakes are powerful enough that you don’t need more than 1 finger to stop efficiently (or aggressively, or however else you choose to stop). The hydraulics allow such a light feel on the lever that there isn’t any need to have more than 1 finger pulling on the lever.
Well set up cable systems also can be used 1-finger, but they don’t tend to remain as consistently smooth for as long.
1-finger means more fingers wrapped round the bar, but if you are happy braking with 2-fingers, then keep doing it…there isn’t a law stating how it should be done, but 1-finger does tend to allow a more controlled stop (as you don’t need to grab the lever as hard and you have more contact wrapped round the handlebar)…but it is whatever works for the rider.
squirrelkingFree Member@dickbarton fully agree but the quote being replied to was:
They are however a two finger brake design, so perhaps not great for teaching good mountain biking habits.
I have no idea why a 2 finger lever would encourage bad habits. Set up right you can use it 1 fingered or all of them on smaller hands.
Anyway, I’m looking at those short throw gear changers, just installed my old SRAM Attack shifter on my daughters bike and wondering if they might be a bit long on the throw.
EDIT: ah wait a minute, that’s a different ratio to traditional 9 speed isn’t it?
1thepodgeFree MemberI’ve been swapping out twist shifters for Decathlon own brand trigger shifters on kids bike and noticed there was a lot of seemingly unneeded throw so if these are easy enough to get hold of and compatible then they could be a nice little upgrade.
DickBartonFull MemberAh, skim reading without my glasses on and I’d missed that…and there was I trying to be helpful (and probably straying into patronising – not intentionally).
Also agree, unsure why 2-finger braking would encourage bad habits either…I see plenty folk skidding and they all use different finger solutions for braking, so it doesn’t seem to be the more fingers the worse you are at braking…I blame the mags and influencers trying to make things look cool. This thing can’t be cool – I do it! 😉
1stwhannahFull MemberTwo finger braking is less desirable on a mountain bike because there are are fewer fingers on the bars to hold on with – especially important on the bumpier stuff. If you’re braking with two fingers, you’re only holding on with your pinky and ring finger – weak fingers. Add in a middle finger and you’ve got a much better grip on things. It does need your brake levers to be a shape that suits one finger, and to be light enough to squeeze with just one finger, but most decent MTB brakes do that these days. If you’re used to hauling on your brakes with two fingers, it can take a bit of brain training to get that middle finger off your lever and onto your grips. See also: having your thumbs under the grips instead of on top of them (yes, that’s a thing too).
seriousrikkFull MemberSorry – for the hard of thinking, what’s so wrong with two finger braking?
It reduces the amount of your hand used for gripping the bars which in turn can reduce the amount of control, and increase fatigue when riding rougher terrain.
Non issue for many people, but makes a difference for some.
2sillyoldmanFull MemberYes, but plenty of us grew up with pre-V-brake cantis, and/or shitty brakes on early 80s BMX bikes and so had no option but to use 2 fingers. Doesn’t mean you can’t adapt to 1 finger braking later.
Or just mount the levers inboard – don’t hear people talking about Hope’s monstrously long levers as multi finger levers.
speaker2animalsFull MemberBaffling. Why not just make it part of the CUES system? You know, CUES, the one they were banging on as being cross compatible across 9/10/11 speeds.
I’m sure they know what they’re doing? LoL!
chrismacFull MemberAre you sure its not an April Fool? Only 8 speed and not compatible with either Cues or the standard range. Im not sure what they are trying to achieve?
sillyoldmanFull MemberBecause it’s a sub-Cues group? Interchangeable with current stuff (unlike Cues), and so addresses concerns of those who either don’t want/need the increased durability that Cues brings, or don’t want to pay the entry price to that set up as it’s effectively a whole new group, whereas Essa parts can be used in existing 8 speed set ups.
Essa- entry level 8 speed compatible with existing parts.
Cues – 9/10/11 speed set ups with some cross compatibility but not backwards compatibility, and with focus on durability for some MTB riders and E-MTB riders.
SLX upwards – 12 speed Hyperglide+ with focus on shift speed and performance.
Makes sense for the different types of rider out there.
squirrelkingFree MemberSee also: having your thumbs under the grips instead of on top of them (yes, that’s a thing too).
Did you mean that the other way round? Because thumbs should definitely be under.
Only 8 speed and not compatible with either Cues or the standard range. Im not sure what they are trying to achieve?
It is compatible with the standard range, it’s just consolidating Tourney, Alivio and Acera. Makes sense tbh and the cassette range negates the need for front gears. Not sure about the price being “budget” though.
chakapingFull MemberIt is compatible with the standard range, it’s just consolidating Tourney, Alivio and Acera. Makes sense tbh and the cassette range negates the need for front gears. Not sure about the price being “budget” though.
Agree with this.
I reckon it’s 99% aimed at the OE market though, where the pricing will be very low.
And the real life aftermarket pricing will probably be much lower than RRP?
5labFree MemberSurely the levers would be the same as normal levers with reach adjust wound in? Or do they push more fluid for each mm of lever travel thus reducing total stroke at the same time as reducing power?
sillyoldmanFull MemberLever angle will be improved over a standard lever with reach adjusted right in.
tjaardFull MemberExactly this ^.
Although my own first “real” mtb, in 2004, had disc brakes, I started with the old habit of 2 finger braking.
This meant that on rough descents, I would alternate between holding on with 3 or 4 fingers, then switching to 2 fingers on the brake and 2 on the grip.
Once I heard about 1 finger braking, it was the easiest technique improvement of all the tech tips back then and since.Suddenly I had a secure grip AND was ready to brake at any time!
Granted it wasn’t the hardest habit to change, but still, it’s a habit, so I agree, I’d much rather have new riders learn to use 1 finger from the get go.
On the other hand, the reality is, most of the bikes with these groupsets will not be used in serious mtb terrain, so I can see why Shimano would do it.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.