London – time to get rid of cyclists.
Less bikes = more better! Hear me out:
The city of Beijing (once home of some 9 million bicycles) is finally winning the war against cycling. A three pronged attacked seemed to work well enough:
1. Encourage car ownership for every type of journey.
2. Identify cycling as transport for ‘losers’. (See – ‘I’d rather cry in a BMW than laugh on a bicycle’)
3. Put bicycle bans in place citing ‘congestion’ as the reason *
* If they had just turned a blind eye then bans might not have been necessary. Social Darwinism would have won the day, albeit more slowly. (Motorists traditionally get a slap on the wrist if anything for killing a cyclist – it’s like the perfect murder, ok more like squashing a badger, as no-one really cares except for weirdos or close family)
London (and other UK cities) you’re lagging behind. Might I suggest:
1. Scrap Vehicle Excise Duty along with the roads component currently taken from general tax, and instead bring back a simple ‘road tax’ – payable only by and for motorists. This way motorists can feel rightly entitled to have sole use of the carriageway and be justified to point at/mow down cyclists for not paying it.
2. Following on from aforementioned tax reforms – public opinion is by now firmly anti-cyclist in every way. It should be easy to repeal original ‘public highway’ laws and hand the whole shebang exclusively to motorised vehicles. Horses, cyclists, pedestrians? All old technology, no place in the modern world. ‘Roads weren’t designed for bikes/horses etc anyway’ is a useful slogan. Just like pigeons are now known as rats with wings, cyclists are simply rats with wheels. What makes them think they own the roads eh?
Beijing is also beating you on smog levels by quite a margin. You’re supposed to be the ‘Big Smoke’, remember?
3. Use the ‘Big Smoke’ appellation with the righteous pride it deserves: ‘The Big Smoke’ – The Future. Today.