Home Forums Chat Forum Misuse of words – driving me crackers!

  • This topic has 208 replies, 75 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by nickc.
Viewing 40 posts - 81 through 120 (of 209 total)
  • Misuse of words – driving me crackers!
  • oldtennisshoes
    Full Member

    infer/imply – what kind of dunce gets those the wrong way around?

    And outwith obvs – it’s not even a real word.

    martinhutch
    Full Member

    If I see one more person say

    Can you see what I just said about that phrase?

    run amok

    Didn’t know you were Malaysian. EDIT: Ah, this has been addressed already. 🙂

    perchypanther
    Free Member

    I spent time in Malaya

    Before 1963 we presume?

    tjagain
    Full Member

    Outwith is actually in reasonably common usage in Scotland and is a real word. Its just you Normans down south don’t know it.

    maccruiskeen
    Full Member

    You mentioned doodle****s on another thread once – its an utterly brilliant word.

    It must be in that particular blood line. In her current stage of dementia the Doodle****s are the pieces of one of her jigsaws that have seagulls on. ‘Doodle****’ seems to be a googlewack so it seems to be her own invention

    Her mother referred to loo in our static caravan as “the Chemi Khazi”

    maccruiskeen
    Full Member

    Outwith is actually in reasonably common usage in Scotland and is a real word.

    But its outwith your OED 🙂

    I once made a set of bookmarks with “Without Outwith Within” printed on them and used to slip them into dictionaries In bookshops and libraries

    tjagain
    Full Member

    PP – 62 – 66 IIRC ( Actually I don’t remember it at all) but I was using “amok” in the correct sense. I don’t think only Malaysians can run amok. Anyone can so long as they do it properly in a Malaysian style ( Is Malaysian not the products of the country and Malays the people – like Scots and Scotch?)

    Oh – and considering I have apparently been “hoist by my own petard” I really should let you know I do not actually own a 17th century mortar

    maccruiskeen
    Full Member

    Oh – and considering I have apparently been “hoist by my own petard” I really should let you know I do not actually own a 17th century mortar

    But if you’ve been hoisted by it you are technically the Registered Keeper

    perchypanther
    Free Member

    ( Is Malaysian not the products of the country and Malays the people – like Scots and Scotch?)

    yes, but the country stopped being called Malaya in 1963. It’s Malaysia now.

    IHN
    Full Member

    For a good couple of hours this Beeb article

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/olympics/52036792

    …talked about ‘unchartered territory’ in it’s headline and copy.

    tjagain
    Full Member

    If you have been “hoist by your own petard” You have been strapped across a wide mouthed short barreled cannon and blown to bits

    oldtennisshoes
    Full Member

    I once made a set of bookmarks with “Without Outwith Within” printed on them and used to slip them into dictionaries In bookshops and libraries

    🙂

    whitestone
    Free Member

    talked about ‘unchartered territory’ in it’s headline and copy.

    Oh, the ironing 😉

    funkrodent
    Full Member

    The use of personally when expressing an opinion, as in “well personally I think that all Guls have brown heads”. No neeeeeeeed!

    If you have been “hoist by your own petard” You have been strapped across a wide mouthed short barreled cannon and blown to bits

    Naaa. A petard was a small bomb or hand grenade. it means the thing has gone off in your face.

    You’re confusing it with being blown from a cannon which (I think) was a punishment originating in the Sikh army and adopted by the East India company as it was suitable gruesome.

    nickc
    Full Member

    If you have been “hoist by your own petard” You have been strapped across a wide mouthed short barreled cannon and blown to bits

    No, you have not, it was an illusionary device written originally by Shakespeare (Hamlet, I think). It has no meaning other than the one given to it. it’s never had any other use

    Christ almighty, you’re a crap pedant.

    poly
    Free Member

    And while we are at it bring back thee and thou. YOu being used for plural and singular causes huge confusion

    not in Glasgow. You is singular. Yous is plural!

    gauss1777
    Free Member

    Infinity is less clear as the maths is changing and there are now various different infinities. Eeeh when I were a lad there was just one.

    Yes, but all infinities are infinite. They are not just a fairly big number. Cantor died in 1918.

    IHN
    Full Member

    talked about ‘unchartered territory’ in it’s headline and copy.

    Oh, the ironing 😉

    Arsebaubles.

    tjagain
    Full Member

    Christ almighty, you’re a crap pedant.

    But good at getting a 3 page stupid useless debate with lots of folk in it going.

    🙂

    nickc
    Full Member

    But good at getting a 3 page stupid useless debate with lots of folk in it going.

    Yes, I believe it’s called “The Edinburgh defence” An original phrase meaning to hurriedly backpedal when you realise that you’ve been found out.

    Oh, (as the kids say) teh ironing…

    gauss1777
    Free Member

    I find the use of genius irritating. Newton was a genius, someone kicking a football into a net from 10m not so much.

    tjagain
    Full Member

    Christ almighty, you’re a crap pedant.

    It all depends on how you define “pedant”

    nickc
    Full Member

    It all depends on how you define “pedant”

    In this case, it’s some-one who’s been hoist by their own petard.

    BillMC
    Full Member

    He was like, I’ve got your back, take an uninterested look at, can I get, don’t get me wrong, if that makes sense, could of.

    Greybeard
    Free Member

    I’m sure Petard never meant a wide mouthed canon. I’ve always understood it as any disposable explosive device used in siege warfare. The internet now says it was a small conical or bell-shaped device, which I think is illustrative of how material is copied between websites. Derived from the French ‘pet’ (the English word for domestic companion animal must cause just as much amusement in French schools as the German for ‘journey’ does in English schools).

    I think Shakespeare must have been referring to a real device as the audience wouldn’t have understood the point if he’d just invented it; the next line of the play is about going one yard below their mines and blowing them to the moon – that’s a reference to the original military use of ‘mine’, which meant digging a tunnel under the fortifications and exploding a bomb beneath them.

    eddiebaby
    Free Member

    Cantor died in 1918.

    Eddie Cantor is dead!? 😳

    Cougar
    Full Member

    No, you have not, it was an illusionary device written originally by Shakespeare (Hamlet, I think). It has no meaning other than the one given to it. it’s never had any other use

    Christ almighty, you’re a crap pedant.

    Correct, it is indeed from Hamlet.

    Fun fact, the etymology for ‘petard’ comes from a Latin word meaning fart. So you could argue that it means that one has farted so hard that it’s knocked them off their feet.

    Scapegoat
    Full Member

    I find the use of genius irritating. Newton was a genius, someone kicking a football into a net from 10m not so much.

    In much the same way as “legend” has changed from the person who attacks a machine gun nest single-handedly to save the entire platoon, to coming back from the bar with bags of scratchings.

    Spin
    Free Member

    I find the use of genius irritating. Newton was a genius, someone kicking a football into a net from 10m not so much.

    I like Schopenhauer’s definition of genius- talent hits a target no one else can hit. Genius hits a target no one else can see.

    Cougar
    Full Member

    affect/effect

    I’ve never in my life conflated / confused these two words until recently, where I’ve seen them used incorrectly so often that I now have to pause and think about which one if should be.

    it is generally the stupid people that actually change it.

    Scapegoat
    Full Member

    My biggest personal bugbear is the word “prevaricate”. People use it in place of the word “procrastinate”. There’s a world of difference in their separate meanings.

    Spin
    Free Member

    I also like Robertson Davies on genius-

    He was a genius – that is to say, a man who does superlatively and without obvious effort something that most people cannot do by the uttermost exertion of their abilities.

    poah
    Free Member

    @joshvegas

    weight is a force and measured in newtons. W = mg therefore isn’t a constant unlike mass. It is basic 1st year science.

    also this is a misuse of words thread so STFU 😛

    jobro
    Free Member

    .

    maccruiskeen
    Full Member

    The only gul with a full black head is the Mediterranean Gul.

    Or an Exxon one

    mrmonkfinger
    Free Member

    “we will be landing momentarily”

    Having looked this up, I learn “momentarily” can mean

    “for a very short time.”
    or
    “at any moment; very soon.”

    Though one appreciates this uniquely North American meaning is a recent perversion.

    fruitbat
    Full Member

    Happy – as in ‘Find your happy’

    Rich – as in ‘Find your rich’

    FFS

    mrmonkfinger
    Free Member

    W = mg

    W is watts, i.e. power.

    tjagain
    Full Member

    🙂

Viewing 40 posts - 81 through 120 (of 209 total)

The topic ‘Misuse of words – driving me crackers!’ is closed to new replies.