I agree with the 14 day cooling off stage for what its worth and think its pretty shady of ling to ask £500+ for… (actually i dont know what its for anymore) although the OP is also wrong to say they will pay said ‘fine’ then back out. That website is a true reflection of what web designers can do on a ton of acid. Lets keep this thread going by taking it in turns to back out of buying a car off ling,
Ling is adamant a 14 day cooling off period doesn’t apply to her….. She’s backed by Gateshead Trading Standards remember, who when approached to confirm this gave a firm 🙄
I can’t speak for the person who signed the form, however, day to day he is surrounded by lawyers in his work, so maybe he knows enough about the law to realise that such loosely termed nonsense on the order form that has absolutely no links to any company T’s & C’s and no specific amount was probably made up by someone who doesn’t work for Gateshead Trading Standards and actually is a cleaner at Gateshead Primary School and he a) didn’t think it would be cancelled due to the fact at the time of ordering we had no plans to cancel and b) thought that if we had to then it would have been in a well documented cooling off period covered by fairly common distance selling rules that apply to pretty much everybody, except Ling, in her mind.
As the car (to her own admission) was never ordered then she doesn’t really have any real loss. Her loss is the same as mine and SC’s which is the loss of time discussing which stock cars where available and the time spent on here establishing that her process is back to front, she has a total disregard for data protection and how she handles sensitive data and after the phone call that’s just been had with the FCA, very little respect for the FCA code of conduct.
With regards to the website then I’m with Ling on that one, it is amazing…. I can’t take that away from her (apart from a huge lack in T’s & C’s stating any cancellation process whatsoever..
Now she is stalking my bestie/BIL/proposer on LinkedIn and basically trying to satisfy her crazy self obsessed notion that he has applied for finance illegally, then it’s time to bring this to a close because quite frankly her accusations are libellous, incorrect and her conduct is falling way short of the FCA’s code of conduct. He has now taken legal advice based on the screen dumps of everything on here and this is going to get quite snotty now.
I can take all the snotty, judgemental comments in the world on here, people have obviously cottoned on i’m a loser who has a history of backing out of things, so fill your boots, it blows right over my head *most of the time*
He on the other hand, has no active part on this forum, has filled in documentation she has requested using his own information and acted completely within the boundaries of the law and her website yet he is being touted as a joker who has fraudulently tried to obtain a vehicle and lied lied lied. And now she’s sniffing round his LinkedIn profile (obviously trying to verify his work info) then that takes shit to a whole new level, so its time for that to be nipped in the bud.
So not only are Trading Standards, FCA (awaiting a response on IC), my mate is too.
Meanwhile I may fill my time looking out for some other people who’ve had incorrectly applied ‘fines’ from her for backing out… Could be a nice little earner.
over and out.